Downsizing Of Government Research Paper

What has become of parks in the United States has taken creativity and minimized its possibilities. A child’s advocate and architect, Lady Marjory Allen, commented her thoughts on what parks are like today. “Allen was disappointed by what she described in a documentary as “asphalt square” playgrounds with “a few pieces of mechanical equipment”(Rosin 4). When you describe parks as this it doesn’t sound fun at all, and certainly not to kids. Parks have been made to be all the same, the same swings, slides, etc.

cause parks to miss out on visitors and lose income, as no person wants to go

Reduction of Service Considerations: Under a consolidated government, there could be a reduction in service for city residents.

This large amount of people has prompted legislative action to clearly define the park’s borders in 1929, and has also inspired park management programs to protect the

The most important spending change to be made in the cluster is the National Park Service. It takes up less than .1% of the Little Guys. More money should be put into the National Park Service because we need to preserve our parks. National parks are homes to many animals and provide nice areas for people to go and relax. As stated in Document E, national park service “includes administration and maintenance of 58 national parks, 123 historic sites, and 74 national monuments.” Whether it be park, historic site, or national monument, it needs to be protected. Industrial services want to get rid of parks so they can build buildings. By getting rid of them, they are hurting the environment and the ecosystem. Trees provide the oxygen we breathe and by cutting them down, we are in a sense, killing ourselves. Building more buildings would just cause more pollution and further hurt the environment. The Preamble goal that the National Park service addresses is general welfare. Another goal is securing the blessings of liberty. Document A states that “one of the reasons for fighting the American revolution was to protect the “inalienable rights” of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” That means that we have a right to take care and preserve our parks and we should not be persuaded to get rid of

It is extremely fascinating that “general science and space (NASA) accounts for thirty-one billion dollars as opposed to national park service which only gets three billion dollars” (Document E). Thusly, funds from general science and space should be designated to national park service because national parks provide for the domestic tranquility with their relaxing and tranquil sites and serene environment. To continue, there are “fifty-eight national parks, 123 historic sites, and seventy-four national monuments” that have to be maintained and renovated so how can three million dollars be enough for all of these pieces and memorials of history (Document E)? General science and space would survive a cut in funds considering that America is no longer in the space race with Russia and it is not all that often that NASA sends new satellites into orbit or rovers to different planets. General science and space is not as useful as it used to be due to a growing number of private companies that are starting to take over the science and space industry. For these reasons, national park service needs to make up more than “just greater than .1 percent” of the budget (Document E). In conclusion, there are changes that need to be made to all three major clusters of the federal

They argue that the state governments are not extensive enough to provide these services and many others and that a strong central government will be able to provide these services more effectively. Take for example, the national parks, which are managed by the National Park Service and are a piece of American culture. Strong central government advocates say that states cannot maintain a uniform standard of upkeep, because of the differences of politics and cultures. The state parks and wildlife in Georgia are managed differently than the parks and wildlife in California. They claim that a federal government is necessary to make sure that all parks are kept up and well maintained, to provide a pleasurable experience for all who attend.

If we want our children to become more active then we need to find ways to provide areas where they can safely plan and interact with other children. We need to encourage community members to actively participate in opportunities to create a healthier community. A partnership with community members is needed to make the changes necessary to promote and provide access to safe recreational areas for children. In the short term while we are trying to find ways to clean up existing playgrounds and build new ones, we need schools to open gyms and sports fields during non-school hours so children can play safely after school, on the weekend and over summer vacation. Creating affordable after school programs, summer programs and free or low cost summer camps for low-income families is a place to start while working on building more and safer playgrounds. There are challenges regarding cleaning existing playgrounds or creating new ones. Neighborhoods or schools lack the resources to provide playgrounds, parks and after school programs and some neighborhoods are unsafe for children. Parents can become advocates for their children by writing letters to school administrators and board members. Encourage local officials to install park equipment, bike paths and safer

In the United States, there are millions of acres of land dedicated to our national parks. Over half of the states in our country have land dedicated to national parks, and according to Linda J. Bilmes and John Loomis, the National Parks Service protects 412 of these places. The amount of land dedicated to these parks is quite a considerable amount and it has drawn the attention of the federal government. The government believes there should be cut backs on the amount of land dedicated to places such as Yellowstone and Ellis Island. However, if these parks, monuments, etc. were to be reduced in size, the United States would lose protection of a magnitude of important things such as areas of land and water, animal habitats, historical sites, monuments, and areas sacred to

The purge is a dreadful night where the government makes all crime including murder legal for 12 hours. A young girl, named Charlie Roan, whose family fell victim to purge participants on one of these nights vowed to get elected and put an end to the purge. Charlie gets her chance and is running a convincing campaign against the New Founding Fathers of America (NFFA). The NFFA begins to see her as a real threat and creates a plan to kidnap her on purge night and ultimately eliminate her to make sure she does not win the election. The NFFA hire a neo-Nazi group to find and kidnap her by infiltrating her safe house. The groups plan is thwarted by a secret service agent who rescues Charlie and does his best to protect her throughout the night as they seek safety on the streets of DC. While searching the streets for safety they are captured by Russian tourists who have come into the country to kill for sport while it is legal. They are then rescued by two civilians whom are trying to protect their shop from vandalism. These civilians then lead them to the resistance, and underground group of people who are helping others who fall victim to the purge. The resistance has a hidden agenda. They plan on assassinating the head of the

An article by Elizabeth G. Daerr, titled, Town Reaps Rewards of Park It Once Opposed. The article “Focuses on the economic benefits of the Kenai Fjords National Park to the small neighboring town of Seward, Alaska, which originally opposed its creation” (Daerr). In 1980, the town of Seward opposed the creation of the park because they feared it would interfere with the town’s development of mining and fishing (Daerr). Since the development of the park, the town has seen pretty much all success. According to Daerr, residents in Seward have seen a higher standard of living, more restaurant and job choices, and a good relation with the parks services (Daerr). Some of the miniscule negatives are seasonal activity, crowding and shortage of housing, and low-wage seasonal jobs

(show graph) Today, I would like to persuade you to take action and either donate to a national park or write a petition (and/or) letter to possibly make a change, but first I will describe the effects of budget cuts to our parks. Need Step Budget cuts have a major impact in regards to reducing the quality of our parks; as a result, it could affect the visitation rates in the future. John Garder, Director of Budgets and Appropriations for National Parks Conservation Association stated, “There has been more than a 7%, or $173 million reduction in the account to operate national parks and more than a 12%, or $364 million reduction in the total budget for the National Park Service over the last five years.” (2015)

People do not treat National Parks as actual nature safe havens anymore. Even those who develop the National Parks seem only to be in it for the money. The primary function of the park service should be to protect nature and its inhabitants as it is, and to not create roads, buildings, or any other destructive infrastructure. Cities are for paved roads, big buildings, and fast cars, so we should not put these in our National Parks.

The Issue of National Park conservation has become a widely controversial issue today. With the National debt reaching 17 trillion dollars some politicians think it is alright to either sell off national park land to commercial foresters, miners, and even foreign nations or to just close some parks entirely to make up some of the national debt. They are completely unaware that the parks arent just a “pretty area of land for tourists”. Many cities depend on the parks for their well-being. A quote from a local newspaper in California supports this “National parks don’t boast concession stands or charge tax, but data indicates they bring in millions of dollars to local economies each year”(Tree). Supporters of cutting the parks include big CEO’s of major companies and some of them not even in this country.

The creation of the computer and the Internet has significantly furthered and revolutionized Parks and Recreation Districts across the country. Parks and Recreation Management is a profession that has been able to prosper with the Internet and personal computers today. Recreation in the present day is becoming especially popular due to a general decrease in working hours because of the economy. With many people having more free time, more demands are put on the Parks and Recreation districts. Also with the many national, state, and private parks in the United States, it is crucial for the park systems to have a systematic approach to dealing with these new demands. The computer and Internet has become the answer to this problem.