Dp Review

Since its construction in 1799, Ash-Lawn Highland underwent constant structural additions, renovations, and modifications for nearly 131 years. It is the scope of my research assignment to identify the various architectural styles and historical changes in the structure from 1799 to 1930.

Question 1. Choose an architect or practice whose work is covered by or relevant to this course and discuss critically one or more of their design projects or drawings or urban proposals as precedent case-studies. Selectively situate this work in relation to their body of work, and against the practices and concerns of the period. Focus on the architectural qualities of a specific key aspect of the design of the projects. Selectively consider how they might relate to the historical situation, cultural values, theoretical concerns and design practices of the time. This may involve a selective analysis of compositional design practices, material fabrication production and the experiential reception of built outcomes of the projects.

I am pleased to share my concerns, analysis and recommendation about the Merseyside Project with you. Your DCF analysis is excellent and helpful. However, I have to make some changes to it. The memo will be divided into 6 parts.

The underlying intention of this document in its current form (Parts 1 and 2) is to establish an “As Is” picture, so to speak, of a Council’s development assessment processes.

• Researched information informs the design; with guidelines/constraints, such as Local Authority and Conservation Policy (A9), along with specialist consultant’s reports – including Day

The student read the following stories My Friend, Going to Family Camp, Planting a Garden. In My Friend the student read a total of 93 words. She retold me 38 words for a score of 41%. In Going to Family Camp She read 78 words and retold 20 words. Her total score of 26%. In Planting a Garden the student read 92 words and retold 25 words. Her score was 27%.

The applicants had a phenomenal presentation. Peter was clear and concise and confronted the issues from the start. This left their rebuttal time to mainly attend to the community’s issues and few questions from the commissioners. The Planning Commission performed equally as well. Ryan played the role as case

The focus of this study evaluates the effects of using DDACTS and RTM in implementing the ILP concept within the City of Gulfport through other studies conducted across the United States. The City of Gulfport is located on along the Gulf of Mexico within the State of Mississippi (Figure 1). Gulfport has a total area of 64.2 square miles and is home to an estimated 71,750 people according to the latest population estimate provided by the United States Census Bureau. The Gulfport Police Department (GPD) is responsible for keeping the residents and visitors of Gulfport safe by patrolling the area.

This provides those most directly affected by a proposal with the opportunity to prepare for works nearby, and also to review the plans for the development. If they feel it is necessary, they can then provide feedback to council. Submitting and receiving feedback serves a number of purposes. Firstly, it alerts council to the sentiment of existing residents towards the proposal. This is important as it provides council with a source as to how responsive immediate neighbours are to the proposal and design, and whether it is in fitting with the local neighbourhood character according to those living in the area. Secondly, it provides similar feedback to the developer of the land, who can take such objections in to consideration and modify their plans if necessary. The requirement of notice to residents is an important step in ensuring that the community and neighbours likely to be affected by a proposal are involved and feel included in the planning process. As these are the members of the community who are most likely to be affected by a proposal, it is only fair that they are provided with adequate time to prepare themselves and their property for works that are likely to occur, as well as sufficient time to formulate an argument against the proposal if they feel it is not fitting.

A story makes an old building charming. In reality, a pleasing exterior view does not ensure people will be attracted to the particular heritage building. It is the story behind the heritage building that gives meaning to both building and people. As a heritage building, the building itself has been passed the test of time and becomes a typical landmark for a city. Hence, the story of the building explained its architecture style and structure which makes it be a remarkable building. For instance, Sultan Abdul Samad Building (SASB) has a unique architectural design which is the mixture of several architectural styles. This result is caused by the Charles Edwin Spooner, the state engineer of Public Work Department, Selangor, who worked in Ceylon before transferred to Selangor. He preferred to design a Mughal-style building on a Classic Renaissance style ground plan which suggested by A.C. Norman. Moreover, British Victorian style is incorporated into this building’s design as the British colonized Malaya. This story explained its unique architectural structure while gave the new generation a better understanding of the classic architectural style and the history of Malaysia. Thus, theories, ideas, and ideologies which influenced the

The authority gradually identifying with planners, treated disasters and resistance faced by the development as if they were the result of faulty theories or incorrect implementation. It faces the same way the incidents that follow, thus creating an endless cascade of problems, technical or otherwise, that broaden the skills and ignorance that generates development, and the powers and powerlessness that it makes possible (Baylis et al: 2013).

However, what the developers need to consider before all the design, be familiar with the legislation in Christchurch New Zealand is the most crucial thing for the developers. The legislations include Resource Management Act 1991, Building Act 2004, Privacy Act 1993, Food Act 2014, Sales and Supply of Alcohol 2012 and Health and Safety at Work 2015 which all need to be aware of and ensure the developers of the business would meet these legislation compliances. Given the report also illustrates the developed plans for some of these legislations as well as the probable management issues that may result from failing to meet the compliance.

The more the planning process facilitate public participation, the more community will be aware of the planning function as a democratic and community force;

The literature review will closely discuss the effectiveness of development control in the road reserve. The literature review consists of three main themes which include; policies and legislations relating to planning and development control, Development control within the road reserve and the benefits of development control.

Ruakura has been recognised as a long term growth cell for growing populations through employment, industrial and lifestyle opportunities within Hamilton City (O’Dwyer 2016). It is situated within what is described as the “Golden Triangle”, between Auckland, Hamilton and Tauranga, therefore is seen as an ideal location for growth hub and port facilities, due to the access between ports of Auckland and Tauranga (Tainui Group Holdings 2016). This area is located within the urban rural fringe, across 822-hectare (refer to Figure 1). Due to this location, urban development is prohibited within the area, according to the operative district plan rules. This develops the issue of the plan change through Tainui Group Holdings Limited and Chedworth Properties Limited aiming to proceed with development of the inland port in this area (Environmental Protection Authority 2013). Through the proposed plan change, it pursues to add objectives, and policies to the District Plan that allows for urban development, therefore removing the prohibited activity status of urban development from the plan (Turner & Kyle 2014). There are many stakeholders, and individuals involved through this development and plan change consent. These groups involved include Hamilton City Council, Tainui Group Holdings Limited and Chedworth Properties limited, as well as many other submitters, from other organisations and affected parties.