preview

Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde Moral Analysis

Decent Essays

Living in a world without morals—or more specifically, moral consequences—may seem ideal to some. But is this realistic? In his novella The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Robert Louis Stevenson addresses the dangers of trying to live in a world of extreme morals or living in a world with no morals. In order to continue existing, there must be a balance between the two. The character’s Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde, and Mr. Utterson each experience some part of Freud’s tripartite psyche, displaying what happens when there is a lack of balance and why that balance is so crucial: Dr. Jekyll represents the superego; Mr. Hyde represents the id; and Mr. Utterson represents the ego, the fundamental balance of the mind. The superego is the critical …show more content…

It is the reasoning, decision-making part of the mind that helps meet the need of the id in a socially acceptable way (McLeod). Mr. Utterson, a lawyer and close friend of Jekyll, is a man who has morals, but he lives in neither extremes of the id or superego. Utterson is able to mitigate his critical punishing part of his mind and his impulsive irrational part of his mind. This is seen through his description in the opening of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: “[H]e had an approved tolerance for others; sometimes wondering, almost with envy, at the high pressure of spirits involved in their misdeeds; and in any extremity inclined to help rather than to reprove” (Stevenson 1780). His envy is a result of the id; however, his tolerance for and inclination to help others are a result of his ego’s mitigation between the instinctual envy and the critical reproval. This is seen in his encounter and entreaty with Jekyll about the hold Hyde appears to have on Jekyll. Rather than judge his poor friend for his close tie with Hyde, Utterson says to Jekyll: [Y]ou know me: I am a man to be trusted. Make a clean breast of this in confidence; and I make no doubt that I can get you out of it” (1789). Utterson is a trustworthy man because he is logical and rational. He does not punish his friend for his poor acquaintance with a diabolical man; neither …show more content…

His calm approach to Hyde is set off by Hyde’s almost immediate and somewhat aggressive response, upon Utterson’s referral to their mutual acquaintance, Jekyll. Hyde’s cry “with a flush of anger,” saying, “’I did not think you would have lied’” (1786), and his snarl and “savage laugh” (1787) serve only to further highlight Utterson’s fairly calm demeanor, signifying the strength of his ego. Rather than judging Hyde and putting himself on a moral high ground or responding to Hyde in a similar manner and giving into fight instincts, Utterson stands in perplexity of Hyde’s form and nature and tries to rationalize what happened; “’There must be something else… There is something more, if I could find a name for it…the man seems hardly human’”

Get Access