Dr. Josephine Baker's Speech At The March On Washington

Why did it take more than 50 years for women to get the same rights as men after Susan B. Anthony gave her speech? After knowing that it took so many years for that happen, people might start thinking that Anthony’s speech was not effective or she wasn’t able to convince women to fight for their rights. No, that wasn’t a reason for the delay and in fact her speech was very effective. It just took a long period of time for congress to pass the bill that would allow women to vote and hold an office. Susan B. Anthony’s speech “On women 's right to suffrage” was very effective because she was very credible, she tried to speak to and support common sense, and she used repetition to send a strong message to her audience.

"I have walked into the palaces of kings and queens and into the houses of presidents and much more. But i couldn't walk into a hotel in america and get a cup of coffee." an astonishing experience expressed by Josephine Baker in her Speech at the March on Washington. With these tragic experiences occurring to Josephine Baker imagine the gruesome and vile treatment to unrecognized colored citizens in the United states. Josephine Baker notion of this contemplation inspired her fortitude to conquer the adversity of racism in operation within america. As a result of this astonishing vision, she performed one of the most substantial speeches to ever occur in Washington.

Racism had tainted her life from the very beginning. During her childhood she attended a one-room school for blacks only. She was only allowed to attend school for a short time due to the ailing health of

Protests are a way that many citizens have historically exercised their right to freedom of speech and as to voice their opinions on current matters in the U.S. as well as other nations. Protests help the uninformed get informed on specific issues, and try to persuade fellow citizens. What were some of the effective aspects of the protests that were portrayed in “The Matrix”, “Battle in Seattle” as well as those in “The Letter from Birmingham Jail”? What were the downfalls? An effective protest is one where an advocated idea gets across to the intended audience. Peaceful protests tend to have a better outcome than those that lead to violence.

John Lewis, now a US representative for Georgia, was an activist in the civil rights movement at the time of this speech. Lewis has been involved in politics for quite some time. He was one of the leaders that organized the March on Washington in 1963. All of this lead to the speech he gave on August 28th, 1963. When giving this speech, it is clear that he has the confidence of a strong leader. The larger underlying occasion in this speech, in other words, what is going on in the world that caused Lewis to give this speech, was the civil rights movement. At this time, the African Americans in America were protesting against the government in order to gain the rights they deserved. The immediate occasion, in this case, would, in fact, be the speech that Lewis is giving. During the March On Washington, Lewis gave a speech in order to persuade the people to get more involved with the civil rights movement. There are two audiences that Lewis addresses. He is addressing those that are physically at the location of the speech. These people are there in support of the civil rights movement. Then there is the rest of the world, specifically those who are against the civil rights movement. There is a time in the speech where Lewis calls out those who oppose the movement and, in summary, says that we will not sit in silence. The purpose of this speech is to persuade those who are in favor of the civil rights movement and hope that they become even more actively involved. Lewis

Social movements are one of the primary means through which the public is able to collectively express their concerns about the rights and wellbeing of themselves and others. Under the proper conditions, social movements not only shed light on issues and open large scale public discourse, but they can also serve as a means of eliciting expedited societal change and progress. Due to their potential impact, studying the characteristics of both failed and successful social movements is important in order to ensure that issues between the public and the government are resolved to limit injustices and maintain societal progress.

As Farber explains in his book “The Age of Great Dreams” the 1960s were a rough time for many types of people, color, homosexuals, woman, veterans, almost everyone that disagreed with the government had a tough time throughout the 60’s. At the beginning of the sixties everything seems to be fine. Automobiles were being sold, household appliances such as dishwashers, and ranges as well, almost everyone had money except for colored people. For African Americans the 1960s were not so easy going, they were treated unfairly even beaten and chased out of towns, and restaurants. Until mid 1960 African Americans were not allowed to vote. Once they were allowed to vote they had rules and limitations to be eligible to vote. It was the government's loophole

Sojourner Truth was a 80-year old woman who had gone through a lot. She opens up her speech with real-life situations and informs us that all her hard work had never been rewarded. Sojourner is seeking justice for all colored women and hopes that by the end of the speech others will join in on the cause. Being close to the end of her life, she hopes to leave it with a positive impact and message. She begins to compare and contrast how women are working the same jobs as men but are getting payed as much, in order to show that women's suffrage is necessary.

She describes the immigrants feelings towards America as “beating their hearts out at your gates for a breath of understanding.” Arriving in America, she expects everything to finally fall in place and she believes that she will finally get to fulfill her dreams and forefathers dreams by living “in the golden land of opportunity.” In the beginning, her tone is eager and faithful because she was determined to show America what she was capable of doing and how strong she was as a newcomer.

Marches are often an effective way to protest something. During the Civil Rights Movement Martin Luther King Jr. and other participants fought for rights by marching. He would march in a nonviolent way to gain the support of the people. Through these marches King gained lots of attention to shine the light on the issue of the rights of African Americans. Cesar chavez also lead many marches often to protest and raise awareness of issue such as immigrant farm workers rights.

Josephine baker a civil rights activist ,soldier ,and a vocal opponent of segregation and discrimination .the only women to address the audience during the march on Washington Josephine hoped for a land where minorities would not be judged by the color of their skin but the way they carry their character she wanted children to have the ability to go to school and learn "protect your self with the pen ....not the gun" stated Josephine . she was truly a phenomenal women who understood what the wanted and would not sit still until she achieved that goal she believed that every one had equal rights she fought for justice ,freedom and those who could not she bravely stood up for

Did you know, before Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama there was Shirley Chisholm. Shirley Chisholm was an African American female congresswoman who ran for the presidency in 1972, as a Democrat. When she ran for presidency she didn’t run for the blacks or for females, she ran for the people of America. To be a social game changer implies that an individual must be an impact towards change and inspire others to change. Shirley Chisholm was an excellent congress person she had a special insight with words and established herself as an outspoken person & was determined for change early in her 1st term. Her presidential crusade was unexpected & historical, and she spoke out her mind on the equality for the people.

Nonviolent movements are widespread across America, but very little are effective enough to create monumental change or to have a lasting impact. In their article "Waging Nonviolence: What makes nonviolent movements explode", Mark and Paul Engler explore what makes nonviolent protests powerful enough to force change. Written in December 2014, the article uses modern and historic examples of protest movements, with the main focus on the Occupy Wall Street movement, to create the context as to what each of the methods discussed has accomplished. Using the main example of Occupy Wall Street, the article showcases two major points, disruption and sacrifice, that nonviolent protest movements utilize in order to have the greatest effect, as well as how those two points work together to create lasting impacts. Disruption relies on interrupting everyday life and preventing business from occurring, while sacrifice focuses on what people are willing to risk and give up in order to see the change they wish for. In their article, the Engler’s propose that while these two methods of protest can be effective, protests rarely become large enough to actually create any change, even if they are combined, simply because the major businesses, corporations, and organizations that are being protested hold incredible amounts of political power and therefore are able to very easily shut down protests with police forces. This argument, that protests are inevitably going to fail, is very realistic

“It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority” (Benjamin Franklin). Protesting is a popular way people in society question authority. It is questionable whether or not questioning authority improves a society. Many people believe that questioning authority enhances society , while others think that it may lead to the complete opposite.Society is enhanced when people question authority by protesting because it has the power to raise awareness on issues in order to provoke changes in legislation, but others think that by doing so people only create disruption and violence.

Social movements have a tremendous impact on our society and it is important that we understand how those movements are shaped. As individuals we are all part of a greater society and could be called upon to stand up for human rights. Understanding how to shape social movements so they have better chances of succeeding could mean the difference between a society that guides improved human rights and one that loses sight. There is a great deal of literature on social movements and it has become increasing popular since the Vietnam Era of social protest. The literature typically