Dr P Case Summary

Art Beaumont, the newly hired president of MediSys Corp, created a core team in August 2008 in order to accelerate the IntensCare project. Team consisted technically competent employee in six areas: research and development, engineering, software design, production, marketing and regulatory affairs. Jack Fogel, a senior production manager was assigned the project leader. IntensCare project was very important to the success of Medisys but the team had very tight schedule. However, differences started to emerge soon after which obfuscated the future of IntensCare project.

Last week, the court saw the dismissal of a defamation lawsuit filed by the now-Catholic priest, Auxiliary Justice Malcom Gray ruling the reports published by News Corporation Australia as ‘substantially true’.

The case was based on plaintiff claims that they were engaged in protected activity of investigating potential false claims submitted by the hospital to the government. According to the suit filed, a doctor on site was involved in a kickback agreement with the hospital anesthesiologist, Dr. Brad Barth, the husband of one of the plaintiffs in the case.

On the day of October 21, 2015 the accused, Johnny Joshua Uy was nearing the end of his trial. Mr. Uy's case was presided over by Madam Justice Power and was tried on the Supreme Court Criminal level; Mr. Uy also elected to be tried by judge and jury. Mr. Uy was charged with three serious indictable offences. The charges laid against the accused was importing/exporting a controlled substance, possession for the purpose of trafficking, and possession of a controlled substance. All three charges can be found under the Canada's Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. The first charge importing/exporting a controlled substance can be found under section 6(1) of the act. Section 6(1) states: “Except as authorized under the regulations, no person

The meeting began with the chairman recounting the claims against the psychologist, the rules for identifying the complainant, and that the focus of this meeting was to determine if the potential that legal or ethical violations had occurred. All board members were in possession of copies of the information that was available at the time. The complainant was referred to by the initials R. G. for the purpose of maintaining confidentiality during the open meeting. All R. G.’s interactions were conducted by conference call with the board members.

Pt is a 15 y/o African American male presented at NNBHC with a dx of PTSD, ODD, ADHD, Bipolar Disorder, and Depression, who have been demonstate emotional instability and aggressive episodes in the home. Pt discussed that he have been having difficulty controlling his anger when triggered for getting trouble. Pt stated that he god in troubled for hiding soiled clothes in his drawer, where his mother found them. Pt stated he became upset and demonstrated verbal aggression which includes threats and foul language. Pt states that he black outs and have mind/body experiences where he lose control over his actions. Pt states that during his anger outburst typically one of his parents have to tell him what he has done. Pt states he is easily trigger by being called “fat” or discussion of his bed wetting. Pt discussed he frequently have phobias in new places due to believing he may be sexually assaulted again which intensify his nighmares and nocturnal enuereis.

When Jimmy Quatermain pursues a libel claim, he will have to prove defamatory content, falsity, fault, identification and publication on my behalf. The claim made on Quatermain puts his job and reputation at stake. What I wrote on the blog accused Quatermain, the baseball team and the University of all practicing bad habits. Concerning defamatory content, the judge will review the statement in context of the entire article or story and decide if it is a matter of law (libel per se because accusations were made). Afterward if the judge thinks the meaning of the language is unclear and is considered defamatory then factfinder, which is typically a jury or a judge, is

The Plaintiff did not give any consent to the Defendant permitting him to show the information. The language used by the Defendant was harmful, tending to discredit and disrepute the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff's reputation was damaged by the Defendant's disclosure of information, clear by the loss of clientele. As for the statement of HIV that would fall under slander per se, in which case malice on the part of the Defendant does not need to be established. The Defendant had clear and certain knowledge of the negative impact that would result from the disclosure of the information. The Defendant is

First he was negligent in the oversight of his resident physician, next he made a false statement when questioned by his employer, and lastly he altered medical documents that can be used if the case goes to trial (Pandit, 2009). In the Matter of Jascalevich1. It was held that a physician's duty to a patient cannot but encompass his affirmative obligation to maintain the integrity, accuracy, truth and reliability of the patient's medical record. Using this case we can affirm that the medical records are a part of the responsibility of a medical provider and in no circumstance will it be amended to benefit one’s self or other constituents. According to Pozar (2014) tampering with records sends the wrong signals to jurors, and can create a presumption of negligence. It is very clear that if this case goes to trial the physician is liable to face charges of medical malpractice, fraud and

The trial court committed an abuse of discretion by admitting the testimony of Dr. Dalitsch. The case of Catherine Donohue v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission is subject to the standards set forth in Frye v. United States. The seminal case in Illinois law clarifying which cases the Frye standard is applicable is Zachary Donaldson et al. v. Central Illinois Public Service Company et al., 2002 IL 89679. This case established that Frye standards are applicable in medical diagnoses, and that the methodology upon which a medical diagnosis is made must have acquired general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. Zachary Donaldson et al. v. Central Illinois Public Service Company et al. 2002 IL 89679 ¶ 5. The testimony of Dr. Dalitsch

In unit seven I was asked to review a case study video regarding Dr. Williams and his client, Juan. The Dr. Williams and Juan case is intriguing because Dr. Williams’s actions toward Juan and his family are lousy and cringe worthy. Quick synopsis, Dr. Williams defy principles E and B stated within the APA code of ethics. Principle E states that Psychologists must respect the dignity and worth of all people, and the rights of individuals to privacy, confidentiality, and self-determination. Principle B states that Psychologists must establish relationships of trust with clients. The first mistake I recognized Dr. Williams making pertains to his nonexistent eye contact towards his client, Juan. The sense of human connection come from eye

a 3-year-old young girl who saw her mom being assaulted and killed and furthermore her throat was slashed and was left to die. I can't envision what a child would feel or how they would respond after such a traumatic experience. Getting a child who encounter this sort of trauma to talk or trust an expert would be a miracle. The way Dr. Perry worked this case would be a similar way I may have taken care of it. It was critical for him to pick up her trust so he could set up her to affirm against the aggressor.

Accounts Receivable deposit all funds into the defaulted bank accounts. At this time the cash transfer needs to be executed by the Community Controller if that is whet the Board requires. Furthermore this request it’s to be treated the same like any other request transferring funds for one account to another.

Tad Pierson has been handed quite a task within the company with which he works. Tad has been tasked with taking over the survey group, as well as maintaining his current position as Project Engineer. Tad is employed by Agrigreen, Inc., a company that manufactures agricultural fertilizers. The company has also branched out over the last few years, staking mining claims in Nevada, and building pipelines. Tad has accepted the responsibility and assessed his teams, determining that there are valid foundations for the problems and conflicts within the groups, and has reported to Burt Jacobs, the new manager of engineering, that he has met with the group members individually to gather facts and will make his determination as to the direction the department needs to take to grow and prosper. Tad has three employees within the surveyor team that he must decide how to best manage to continue with the company growth, and alleviate the discord and conflicts between the teams.

The following report, for Dr. Derek Raghavan, is about improvements Mellisa Wheeler can make to her work ethic and her daughter, Lindsay Wheeler’s, allowance. Also how well she did teaching at her job shadow day with her daughter and welcoming the new employee, Mendy.