preview

Drag Coefficient Lab Report

Decent Essays
Open Document

Purpose and Background:
We used an air track and varying amounts of mass to determine the drag coefficient on an object. We used the equation FD=1/2CDpAV^2 to determine the drag coefficient. We also used FD=ma to determine FD, and we used V^2=Vi^2+2a(x-xi) to determine velocity. Since the cross-sectional area is remaining constant, the drag coefficient should also remain constant. We will measure the acceleration of the object and use that to determine velocity and drag coefficient. We will do this by pushing the object down the air track, then we will choose the data points that show relatively constant acceleration to calculate average velocity for each mass. We will use the concept of drag to determine that drag coefficient should stay the …show more content…

We began our experiment by measuring out a piece of cardboard and determining its cross-sectional area. We then taped this piece of cardboard to our object and faced it so it would have drag. We then securely taped the motion detector to the end of the air track so it could accurately measure the acceleration of the object. We then massed the entire object with the tape and cardboard as well as the base and recorded this mass. We also measured the length of the air track in meters in order to calculate velocity later. We recorded this data down also. We then placed the object back on the air track and lightly pushed it so it could begin moving. Right after release, we began our data collection with the motion sensor and the LabQuest. We then had the LabQuest calculate the average acceleration of those data points. We recorded that data, then we did one more trial with this same mass. We then added mass to the object and massed it again using the scale. We recorded the new mass, and followed the same procedure as the first two trials. We then added more mass, and followed the same procedures as stated …show more content…

This shows that within the same mass, the drag coefficient was the same, but when the mass changed, so did the drag coefficient. This contradicts our hypothesis as we stated that the mass would have no effect on the drag coefficient. This is due to the error in our experiment. When we measured the length of the track, we measured the whole length. This is an error because the object sometimes did not travel the entire length of the track as we started recording data after the hand was released from the object, so it was not at the very end of the track. Another error in our experiment was we assumed the average acceleration was the only acceleration when this is not the case. The acceleration was changing as the object traveled down the air track. Another inconsistency was that perhaps the air resistance on the cardboard “sail” we created was not consistent. We could reduce the errors by doing this experiment with the varying masses in a controlled environment where air resistance and acceleration are constant. If we set up a photogate instead of just assuming the length of the track was the length the object traveled, then we could have known the real distance it traveled. Another way we could have reduced errors is if we did this experiment more than just a measly two times per mass. Perhaps if we had the time and resources to do this 100

Get Access