Uber’s driverless car is a new step on auto history. People hold different view about the driverless car. Some of them think it is a great invention because it could help a city to change its stereotyped image, like the mayor of Pittsburgh(2016, Kang). At the same time, the regular cars have many issues caused by Uber’s drivers, such as assaulting/harassing female customers, even kidnapping (2014, PICCHI). S[BT2] urely, pessimists opine driverless cars do not have human’s moral rules to judge various situations (2017, O’brien). Self-driving car would create considerable economic or political profits to Pittsburgh. Uber invested a substantial of money to build Pittsburgh which helps this city to get out of the shadow of “Rust Belt” (2016,
An issue that is hotly debated is should UberX be allowed in Toronto. Some think that yes, UberX should be allowed in Toronto but others think that it should not be allowed. Yes I know UberX has been legalized, but this argument is fighting against the legalization. It is clear that overall UberX should not be allowed in Toronto. More Toronto citizens are disregarding UberX. People have realized that though the rates may be low the risk of something happening is high, because UberX’s drivers are untrained and background checks are limited. Although UberX’s rates may be low, the can spike up in times of high demand. During storms and rush hour the fair can double, even triple in cost. The finally reason is that the low rates are unfair to other cab companies, because other cab companies actually hire people as a job, UberX is just for people who want to make extra money.
On one hand, in the last couple of years, there are some criminal activities endanger passengers by Uber’s drivers (Picchi, 2014). Because of these horrible things happened not only let Uber company lost a lot customs but also bring shame on Uber company (Picchi, 2014). Even though Uber claims they are going to do more background checks for drivers, the background checks cannot include all the aspects for the drivers (Picchi, 2014). About driverless cars there also some problem regard to safety problem for example: villainous weather, puddles on the street (Boudette,
Driverless cars are the next big thing and something a lot of people are excited for, but who should be responsible if the car crashes? And If a car does crash would you the driver really want to take responsibility? Driverless cars can be very dangerous. An article called Tesla Bears Some Blame for Self-Driving Crash Death, Feds Say “the system should only have been used on highways with clear lane markings, strict medians, and exit and entrance ramps. So when a tractor trailer turning left crossed into the Model S's lane, the system did not recognize it” One of the deaths that have occurred with driverless car was when the car thought that it was perfectly fine and following the right path, but because the driver wasn't paying attention
Right now self-driving cars and trucks are hitting the road and will soon be available to the general market . Major companies like Google, Tesla, Uber and Delphi are leading in autonomous cars industry. In the past few years, these companies have made great strides improving this technology. Addressing the concerns for this technology must be concluded before it reaches the general public. Given the current state of automobiles that don’t need drivers the American consumer needs to be mindful that moral decisions this technology is handling puts them at risk due to the fact that this is emerging technology, laws are being made that will shape this technology, and who is choosing who lives and who dies.
“Whether you think you can or think you can’t, you’re right!” Henry ford said this to us and was able to prove it when he created the Model T car. Nobody thought it was possible to create a more reliable, affordable car but he knew he could, and he did it. Throughout the years we have been able to create newer technology for our cars making them safer, faster, and more affordable. Our technology has grown so much, that we have been able to create driverless cars. These cars are able to sense their surroundings around them, and drive without human association. But this raises a question for many, can a computer system replace a human at the wheel?
Similarly, the article “The Moral Challenges of Driverless Cars” explains how driverless cars will be a safer alternative. It explains how humans are more prone to cause an accident than the driverless cars. The article describes the processing behind the vehicles and some problems they face while making them along with how this will delay their production. It also clarifies how the cars will be able to make the decisions that will keep people safe instead of putting them in harm’s way. Finally, the article describes the ethical issues and automation in cars today. According to Kirkpatrick, the cars are equipped with software that determine what reaction to make in different situations that would take a human more time to make, therefore, avoiding an accident. As stated in this article, there is still much work to be done before the cars are actually ready to sell to the public.
Opportunities for Uber are endless. Uber can increase the marketing from internet usage, disposable income, alternate transportation, and even special transportation for medical reasons. Special transportation can used to treat anyone who has a medical condition. The drivers can get certified in CPR or something. Every company in the world has room for improvement and all opportunities are possible. Its up to the company and drivers for Uber to contribute in order to take advantage of all opportunities. There is a growing market for Uber and people look forward to not driving everyday. If drivers continue to be reactive instead of proactive the opportunities for drivers will decrease tremendously. “On June 22, 2017, filed a lawsuit against Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp was filed, in order to hold them personally liable for the wages owed to California Uber drivers. Under California law, individuals who advise companies to classify workers as independent contractors, who are later determined to be employees, are personally liable for the companies’ wage violations. Although Mr. Kalanick is no longer Uber’s CEO, we have filed this case to ensure that he and others are held personally responsible for any liability we can establish against Uber (http://uberlawsuit.com/)".
Uber has offered job opportunities for the community; however, the drivers’ professional qualities remain in question. Unlike the taxi drivers and other professional drivers, Uber’s drivers have not been trained. According to a Wall Street Journal news report, 62% of Uber’s drivers have other sources of income – more than one job. Uber is not economically feasible as a full-time job (Macmillan, 2015). In addition, the expenses of gas, maintenance, and insurance are Uber’s drivers’ responsibilities. They do not enjoy the same employment benefits and workplace protections as taxi drivers and other professional drivers (Tucker, 2015).
As fellow patrons of the city’s transportation system, it is important to understand that these safety features came about as a result of fatal attacks on taxi-cab and bus drivers. However, since there have not been any reports of serious assaults on Uber drivers in other Canadian cities so far, we can conclude that Uber drivers do not face the same risks of public assault . Consequently, driver safety should not be a major concern for ushering Uber into our city. As our public opinion polls agree with this statement, it is reasonable to conclude that public assault on Uber drivers will not be a prominent issue
Self driving cars have the potential to completely revolutionize the way public transportation continues in our society; many are for it and even more are against it. It is fair to say that this is a great invention and that in some cases it can serve as a safer way of transportation (only in certain situations) as well as make for a more dangerous one. Tesla is a worldwide known company and although the company did not invent driverless cars, they did most definitely perfect it. Having the most technologically advanced vehicle in the world that can predict accidents before they even happen, it is a safe bet to trust the Tesla autopilot feature. The majority of the population believe that it will be nothing but beneficial to our society and provide us with safer streets and highways. But there is much more than meets the eye when it comes to this new technology.
Your future has arrived, are you ready? Twenty years ago if you had told somebody that driverless vehicles would be driving us around our cities and on our highways, they would have smiled and said only in the movies. Now it is not so farfetched. Driverless cars are fast becoming reality. Just as computers did, driverless cars will change the way we live. And like any other innovation, it would free up time for more creative thinking. In recent years, we have seen small improvements to our cars, making them more automated. Bluetooth and GPS play a big role while driving our cars. GPS will navigate for us without using a map, and Bluetooth allows us to go hands free to concentrate on driving. So, is a fully autonomous car good or
In recent discussions of growing technology, a controversial issue has been whether we are ready for the advancements of driverless vehicles. On the one hand, some argue that these advancements have already proven that we are ready. On the other hand, however, others argue that we need to have more experience with the technology before we can be ready. In sum, then, the issue is are we ready or not for driver-less cars. While others think that driverless vehicles can’t be trusted yet without a commission to help lawmakers with regulating the vehicles and government officials that know more about this technology to better watch over it, I believe that we are ready for this new evolving automobile because driverless vehicles already has too much potential beginning with its self-automated breaking system and warnings.
As technology in automobiles continues to improve, the debate over driverless cars has become more frequent. A self-driving car is able to move and navigate on its own using sensors and programming technology without human control. Many people believe the development of driverless cars would be beneficial because they could reduce the risk of hitting another car. The sensors and navigation would be able to avoid accidents, while drivers usually get distracted and would be able to use their time leisurely in the car. A self-driving car may allow people to drive when unable to in the past, such as children and disabled persons, and can be more cost-effective due to cheaper insurance. However, self-driving cars could be extremely expensive and can easily malfunction and therefore not always reliable, while also decreasing the safety of pedestrians and children who may attempt to use the car without permission. With new technology and distractions, driver’s minds can easily wander and become preoccupied. Technology can easily malfunction, and something as small as my phone or a light bulb will glitch frequently. I often see cars stranded on the side of the road because the engine went out or broke down; imagine how catastrophic an accident could be if a sensor in the car went out. Driverless cars are not beneficial to society because while there are favorable aspects of a self-driving car, one can malfunction and add new risks to the road, as well as potentially hurting the
Following a recent shooting spree of an Uber driver, Jason Dalton; six people were left dead, and two others wounded. During the seven-hour manhunt, the suspect continued to drive and accepted fares. Uber knew but did nothing to stop it. This is just one of the numerous incidents that raised a concern regards to Uber’s safety measures. In fact, many believe “Uber should be regulate the same way as Taxis.”
R. (2016, September 13). Uber Debuts Self-Driving Cars in Pittsburgh. Retrieved October 07, 2016, from