Drones In War Research Paper

There are many ways the government uses surveillance; one way is by using Spy drones. Spy drones are used to fly around the United States and “check” on the country for anything unusual, including drug activity, border patrol concerns, and other domestic issues. Even though the government claims spy drones are protecting Americans they are clearly invading privacy and breaking the Fourth Amendment as well, they should not be used.

Drones already carry a negative, political connotation. The breaches in sovereignty are a major political issue for involved countries. Yemen, Afghanistan, and Pakistan are examples of the United States’ willingness to conduct military strikes without the consent of the governing body within the country. Furthermore, targeted killings are essentially a means for assassinations, which were prohibited under the Reagan administration. However, this fact is abated, as the killing of Anwar Al-Awlaki (US Citizen) demonstrated. Given all this information, would the usage of US drones in Iraq only perpetuate more violence, or bring stability to the region? This report will seek to answer this question. Utilizing an interview with an Associate Professor of Homeland Security at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU), Professor Bonner, as a primary source of research, along with secondary sources from accredited cites, this report will explore the dynamics of the drone program as it pertains to the current situation in Iraq.

The “Unmanned: America’s Drone Wars” is a documentary that discusses more in depth what are the effects of drone strikes on the society, victims and their families. It shows a story of killing innocent children like Tariq and his younger cousin who were hit by a drone strike on their way to a soccer match. In Tariq’s case there was an

The Russians captured Gary. Gary’s incident shows just how dangerous sending our troops over really is. After Gary’s plane crashed, the U.S. Air force developed the satellite. The satellite was the biggest step forward for drones. Satellites used GPS which helped drones on the ground navigate and become precise. Having GPS, drones were able to advance extremely. The article, Unmanned Military Aircraft, states that “GPS utilizes satellites circling the Earth to establish the position of a building or person to within a few feet. Drones equipped with GPs, therefore, can be directed with great percussion.” The article’s statement explains shows how far drones have come in advancement since it’s first development in World War I. Today, the U.S. Air Force already has much of the technology needed for drones. The B-2 Stealth bomber is a prime example. A B-2 pilot states that, “Guess how long we are actually flying the B-2 out of the 34 hours it takes to go from Missouri to Baghdad and back? About two minutes. The rest of the time is spent playing cards, eating, or sleeping.” Today’s aircraft already fly themselves. Technology has advanced to the point where today, pilots are unneeded. The Boeing 777, a commercial jet, can take off and land without any input from a pilot. The new Boeing 777s can take off from a designated spot and land somewhere else without a pilot even in the cockpit. The era for drones is here. The Global Hawk few from

The use of drones for carrying out military attacks is an important current topic. While keeping our soldiers safe is a primary concern, sparing the lives of civilians and limiting the destruction of the local infrastructure is another concern from not only a rebuilding point of view, but also from an ethical point of view. In the article “The Drone Wars: International Law Will Not Make Them Humane” the authors discuss the history of technological advances in warfare and provide details of the factors that have keep these advances under control. This article was co-authored by two individuals, Arthur Herman who is a historian and John Yoo who is a law professor. Through the use of examples from history detailing the use of technology in warfare,

After 9/11, the U.S started to implement policies intended to combat terrorism in hopes of preventing further attacks and bring those who were involved to justice. One such policy that the U.S started was to implement the heavy use of drones- unmanned aircraft capable of bombing specific targets. These drones would be controlled by a pilot remotely from the U.S, thousands of miles from where the strikes were taking place. The U.S used these drones to assassinate suspects who were believed to have been linked to terrorism as well as various targets that were deemed to be associated with terrorism, such as weapons factories. Currently, however, there is a debate on the legality, morality, and effectiveness of drones. One side sees the drones as effective at destroying targets while at the same time, minimizing civilian casualties. On the other hand, the other side believes that drones are reliable for

“Dozens of highly skilled al Qaeda commanders, trainers, bomb makers and operatives have been taken off the battlefield. Plots have been disrupted that would have targeted international aviation, US transit systems, European cities, and our troops in Afghanistan. Simply put, these strikes have saved lives” (Gerdau 1). These are the words of President Obama as he spoke on the effective use of the United States drone program. Drone operations have been in effect since our nation was targeted by al Qaeda in 2001. Anything that threatens American lives is undesirable; therefore, drone strikes against terrorists should continue to be utilized by the American government. In today’s society, our nation is threatened by foreign and domestic attacks from anti-American terrorist organizations. The government’s use of drones has drastically reduced this threat by decimating terrorist cells abroad.

In our country we see aircrafts in the sky every day and rarely fear an attack from above, however, for people in Middle Eastern countries this is not the case. In countries such as Somalia and Yemen they live in constant fear of dying from a bomb being dropped from above. Usually, Americans see themselves as heroes and view Middle Eastern groups as terrorists for these Middle Eastern people though, Americans are the terrorists. This essay will research the United States use of drone strikes in Middle Eastern countries, using scholarly articles to portray what a drone is, the types of drones the US uses, a history of their use, the legality of strikes on foreign soil, and their overall use in the war on terror in order to persuade readers that

UAVs have been operating longer than the public realizes by gathering military intelligence, surveying internal and externally to national borders, and monitoring telecommunications. Drones have been constructed to achieve an operational presence

Are military drones really necessary to fight terrorism? Is it the only way to resolve this issue? Drone technology appears to be increasingly popular as the need of “self-protection” against terrorists becomes more urgent. It is fair to conclude that drones are somewhat efficient. However, plentiful of instances and studies have proved otherwise. The usage of military drones promotes terrorism, violates international laws, and invades privacy. They are harmful rather than useful to our society.

When I started reading Nassar Hussain and Roger Stahl’s articles about drones, I initially thought of the drones that fly up with a “go-pro” and film scenery. My mind did not even think of the military aspect, because drones have grown to be used in many ways. This reading really made me understand my privilege. It was sad to read about what the Yemeni author wrote, how much terror drones have brought into people's lives; especially because today it is a form of entertainment for Americans, but we never considered the impact it has on people who faced drone strikes. In additionally, the reading by Nassar Hussain brought up a good point, which was that drones did not have sound. They could not hear their enemy, nor the sounds around the environment

“There is no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war, except its ending” (Abraham Lincoln). When I look at the world today, watch the news, or listen to the radio – I am often disheartened by the amount of violence I witness arise in our society. Recently, acts of hate and hostility have been exhibited all around, and alas have become a common occurrence. With the world so filled with violence, is it necessary to implement and build new weapons that make murder less difficult? A recent invention entitled a drone has sadly become a general weapon used in war. A drone is a human operated aircraft that makes killing impersonal and blinding to the pilot. When drones are utilized in violent situations, there are many civilian casualties. Drones should not be used as a weapon in warfare because they are an immoral and unsentimental device used to take away human life.

September 11, 2001: one of the most grueling days in the history of the United States, the biggest terrorist attack on American soil. Not only did these attacks destroy symbols of America and take the lives of innocent workers, family members, heroes, and friends, but they sparked the discussion of public safety pitted against personal security in the country. On October 7, 2001, President George W. Bush administered the first use of drones in the fight against terrorism. The controversial topic has left many Americans asking themselves the crucial question: Should the United States continue using drone strikes against terrorists? The morality and effectiveness of drones has prompted discussions in the fight against terrorism on the homefront. The United States should continue to use drone strikes to fight in the war against terrorism as it is an ethical strategy in order to save the lives of many Americans.

While the debate over the use of drones for counterterrorism efforts has intensified, the arguments, both for and against their usage, although informed by plausible logics, are supported primarily by anecdotal evidence and not by systematic empirical investigation. This lack of attention is unfortunate: unmanned aerial vehicles, and

The use of drones is becoming an increasingly popular technology item. Initially developed and restricted to only military use, the advances in technology have suddenly made the public use of drones more accessible. Although, consumer version drones are not as sophisticated and complex as military drones, the principal remains relatively the same. In 2015, worldwide spending on drones was at $4 billion. This was set to more than triple in the next decade with military drone research spending estimated at $30 billion in the next 10 years. (Keller, 2015) The concept of drones is still relatively new to consumers, however they have been around for and used by the military for many decades already. This essay will describe the broad classifications of drones in service used by the military and the airpower task they are employed in. It will also discuss with examples their effectiveness and will evaluate whether the development of unmanned aviation in the 21st century is like the replay of development of manned heavier than air flight in the 20th century. Finally, it will describe the possible military and civilian task for drones in the future ahead.