Drones Persuasive Essay

Drones are a better alternative to traditional methods of war because they kill less civilians, are legal under international law, and also that they do not create more terrorists than they kill. These facts will prove that older methods of war such as mortars, and bombs pale in comparison to the drone and the effect they have and will continue to have in the war on terror.

            First, we have heard that the new of the united states presence talking about the Middle East, you will hear a topic very frequently worry with drone recognition. The government will be involved in the process of trying to use drone technology in warfare. We have read information about the usages of drone missiles attacks on bad people with was done by drones.  In warfare, the usage of drone technology will be increasing. “Now drones are not gathering information, but are used to operate in combat “(“The uav”, 2012, P1).  With the use of advances in technology quickly being developed, companies are now starting to develop an opportunity to size them. They are starting to build their own things to use for was but also for people in today’s world (Wolfgang, 2012, P1). Next, drones which are known as UAVs (Un-manned Aerial Vehicles), are vehicles that do not need a person physically being there to use drones.

Do you like the idea of being able to fly drones in order to target your enemies? Well, the government surely does. The U.S. government is starting to use pilotless drones instead of actual military pilots in order to collect data and fight against terrorist activity in the middle east. Some believe that drones will create more problems rather than help and some believe that drones will help reduce terrorist activity significantly

When I started reading Nassar Hussain and Roger Stahl’s articles about drones, I initially thought of the drones that fly up with a “go-pro” and film scenery. My mind did not even think of the military aspect, because drones have grown to be used in many ways. This reading really made me understand my privilege. It was sad to read about what the Yemeni author wrote, how much terror drones have brought into people's lives; especially because today it is a form of entertainment for Americans, but we never considered the impact it has on people who faced drone strikes. In additionally, the reading by Nassar Hussain brought up a good point, which was that drones did not have sound. They could not hear their enemy, nor the sounds around the environment

I think William Saletan put it best when he compared the use of drones by the United States to laparoscopic surgery. He stated, “They minimize the entry wound and the risk of infection.” In other words, using drones are more efficient than using manned aircraft and troops on the ground. When people look at the total amount of civilian casualties which occurred since we started using drones, they would see that drones have caused fewer civilian deaths and more militant deaths compared to other means.

Camera operator: “Yeah, they called a possible weapon on the military-age male mounted in the back of the truck.”

Despite the cost, drones have become a vital part of modern American warfare because of their ability to precisely target threats and remove the emotions of military away from the battlefield. Drones have become both appropriate and necessary pieces of technology as the United States continues to fight the war on terrorism. This new technology allows for improvements in warfare as it reduces harm to all individuals involved. Unlike other mechanisms previously used in war, drones are used as a means of self-defense for our country but do not put the lives of our soldiers at risk, as they are unmanned aerial vehicles. Because drones are unmanned, they have the ability to limit excessive civilian casualties and pose less of a risk to the soldiers

Drones are advancing the battle field by increasing the impact that our weapons can have and are causing great destruction. It has been published that more civilians have been killed than military personnel. Military drones have caused 176 deaths of children. In total deaths that have been confirmed is 2800, alleged deaths are up to 4,100. The lives that are taken are not just terrorists they are innocent children and people.

Why drones can kill you with the push of a stick and yet we still need it in order to succeed in construction work and aerial filming. An issue that is hotly debated is why it continues to be a problem and if it should be illegal because they can cause planes to crash and also damage private property and also privacy of others. Drones are damage to the environment and planes. Not only that but privacy issues for residential citizens and government private property.

There are numerous questions about the use of drones. One of them is, does the use of drones give military conflicts more of a PlayStation mentality? In other words, does it make it easier to kill a human being? This is one of the biggest myths ever conceived about drone warfare. Nevertheless, Many believe that it will be easier to order the demise of someone if it comes from a drone and not an actual soldier. The theory that drone pilots get disassociated from the destruction that drones can possibly do is erroneous. Drone pilots could be thousands of miles away, but they are in no way disentangled from the deaths that result from the strikes. The stakes are life and death and drone pilots understand that in the exact moment they squeeze

Throughout history warfare has constantly evolved in all aspects weapons, strategy, and the rationality of its declaration. Neglecting the causes of war the object of any country actively at war with another is to win, and the best way to win is to have something better than your enemy. So obviously a major driving force behind these evolutions is to get better at killing than your enemy. Although this is a simple concept the problem that we face now is that we have reached a point where we are too good at warfare and our only constraint is the morality of our attacks. At the center of this predicament are Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, better known as drones, they are arguably the best weapon advancement of the 21st century. The moral issue at hand is whether they are fair and just to the countries and people they are used to attack. Keeping the end-goal of war fighting which is winning in perspective Drones are obviously morally permissible as they increase the United States’ effectiveness at combatting enemies abroad.

When I was young, I hate waiting for the delivery guy to bring my pizza within 10-15 minutes. I wanted to find a way in which we as a society are able to get our food as fast as possible. Drones are able to accomplish this idea. We no longer need to wait 10-15 minutes for someone to deliver our food to our location. Drones are able to deliver the same amount of food or even more within 5 minutes. Not only that, we are able to have drones surveillance an area without risking a human being. I plan on explaining how drones will be important and beneficial to us in the future. The only downside to having drones accomplish most of our work is that we will lose a lot of jobs to robots. However, this route may open up new opportunities for those who don’t have a job. We as a society are living in an era in which nothing is impossible and everything is possible. We are one step closer to have drones do all of our dirty work while we sit back and control it from a safe distance.

“Wouldn’t you like to just teach your daughter how to swim without a drone flying? What happens if a drone falls right next to her? Would it electrocute her?” Kanye West presented these statements in 2014, when he implied that his family and himself were regularly stalked by camera drones, which worried him often. For this reason, he worried that the paparazzi could lose control of their drone and cause an injury to himself and his family. Just like the example stated, there have also been many other reports of invasion of privacy with the use of drones. Another issue with drones, is that the population of jobs have decreased. The use of drones should be prohibited, due to the fact that they cause many concerning issues to people and the rest of the society.

Is one death acceptable for the survivability of hundreds around the world while in the comfort of your own home? Debatable yes, but is it absolutely necessary? In essence, the sacrificial death of one person in hopes of saving an entire population would be the just action even if it means hurting the ones affiliated with the death of a loved one, so yes, it is necessary.

domestic use of drones, what do we do about privacy, due process, and civil liberties.