Dropout Age Should Be Abolished Essay

In their article, Levin and Rouse say that in the United states the dropout rate has fallen since the 1970s. They state that programs should be enforced to promote dropout prevention. While these programs may be expensive, more high school graduates benefit the economy in the long run.

Among one of the numerous debates of today, dropout age seems to be among the most debated. While the general public may wonder why dropout age is even an issue, many will agree that this is a topic worth mentioning in the world today. So what's the whole dispute about? Dropout age has been a concern for many people in the United States for many years now, mainly because while the majority of experts agree on its negative effects, others believe that dropout age shouldn't even matter. However, a group of U.S. Senators has recently taken up a position to lower the age to fourteen. So what's the answer to this debate? Contrary to the Senators' beliefs, dropout ages should be raised to prevent the negative effects high-school dropouts end up having.

In October 2000, the overall picture of high school dropouts had changed little since the late 1980s (Kaufman et al. 2001): For every 100 young adults enrolled in high school in October 1999, 5 had left school without completing a program; of 34.6 million U.S. young adults aged 16-24, 3.8 million—almost 11 percent—had not completed high school and were not enrolled. Some studies have shown that students in schools with a concentration of multiple risk factors (e.g., large schools, large classes, high poverty, inner city location) have less than one chance in two of graduating from high school; furthermore, the economic costs of dropping out have increased as time goes on (Castellano et al. 2001). Adjusting for 50

$10,510, that’s how much less a high school dropout earns annually than an individual with a high school diploma according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. A dropout is less likely to be employed, more likely to be incarcerated and more likely to live in poverty. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, due to incarceration, less paid in taxes and other factors a high school dropout costs taxpayers $292,000 over their lifetime. The financial costs alone should be enough to find ways to increase graduation rates. Research has shown early predictors of dropout are parental education level and early low literacy in the child. Families from one generation to another have a difficult time escaping poverty and families from one generation to another have difficulty improving literacy

From 1972 to 2006 high school dropout rates decreased from 6.1 percent to 3.8 percent. A majority of this decline occurred between 1972 and 1990, when the rate dropped to 4 percent. However, from 1990 to 1995 there was a surprising increase in dropout rates (Laird & others, 2008). Since then there have been numerous debates and discussions on the issue of dropout rates and how to handle them appropriately. From the information above, it is very evident that the United States wasn’t directly involved with the matter. As a result, stated before, President Barack Obama made his claim towards this issue. This urged most states across the nation to raise the dropout age (Ho, 2017). In fact, a study co-authored by Alan Krueger, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, found that in some states approximately 25 percent of potential dropouts stayed in school since the compulsory schooling age was moved to 18. With an additional year of schooling that 25 percent will increase their earnings by at least 7 percent when

Society wonders at what age student should be treated as adults. In this country, sixteen year olds are considered as grown-ups. Certain people think that teens are adults when they are eighteen. Unlike people, students think the mature age of an adult to drop out should stay at sixteen. We should change the dropout age from sixteen to eighteen.

From what I have read on the constitution and age limits on drop out there is nothing between these two things that intertwine that say we cannot lower or raise the age of minimal dropout ages? As I said before though this can either make or break the entire reasoning for the laws existence, the graduation rates could either raise or decline. Those are the risks that we would and still will have to take for those states that have decided to raise the age to

The dropout problem is not only an individual problem, but it is costly to society as a whole. Warren & Halpen-Manners (2007) explained, “high school dropouts is of fundamental social, economic, and political importance and has major implications for educational policy and practice, patterns of economic and racial/ethnic inequality, and the quality of America’s workforce” (p. 335). Coupled with that, Neild et al (2008) further argued going through the portal into adult life without high school credentials carries severe economic and employment penalties. Also, Kennelly (2007) explained “When students drop out…. the toll of the quality of life and the prosperity and competitiveness of the communities where they live and collectively across

The number of high school dropouts is ever decreasing due to the increase in competitiveness in all job markets. Without at least a high school diploma or equivalent, a person is rarely going to be hired over someone with the required credentials. Many entry-level employers (that pay tax to the government and are filed properly) will require a high school diploma or equivalent. The reason for this is that the standard education that is required is there for a reason. Standard public schools are designed to teach students basic societal needs like being literate and being able to do mathematics. This is why the employer would want these credentials. Although not very impressive, it is the bare minimum to the government, and therefore the minimum for most entry level

All through high school one always wonders why certain courses have to be taken. Thinking certain courses are a waste of one’s time and how it takes 12 years just to receive a diploma. Sounds crazy to think half of one’s life is spent in school preparing to receive a better understanding of education. During graduation, walking through the stage makes one along other proud and accomplished of all the efforts that took place. This not only helps one become more educated and aware of the things going around them, but helps become financially stable with a job or other necessities in life. Therefore, high school should be mandatory for students at least till there are 18, and not to drop-out.

The students that drop out of school are almost always trying to get out of doing their schoolwork. Because these students drop out of school, they increase the feeling of not caring about their future job, their spouse, and their life. Students that drop out obviously do not care about getting a good job leading them to again not care about their life and make bad choices. If the dropout rule is eliminated, most students would not end up making silly choices because they are focused on their future. According to apyf.org, “On any given day, about one in every 10 young male high school dropouts is in jail or juvenile detention”(apyf.org”). If more students did not make unacceptable choices, then less people would be behind

People argue about whether to keep students in school until they turn 18. However, contrary to what people may think school should keep students until they are of 18. Since people with high school diploma have more money, less chance of getting into jail or getting public assistance.

The dropout age for students should be raised to 18 years old. First, the more students that stay in school until they are 18, the more the graduation rates increase. Secondly, if students stay in school until 18, they will make higher income in their career. Lastly, even though some feel there is good reasoning behind dropping out at 16, students who stay in school until they are 18 have more social benefits. In conclusion, there are more benefits to staying in school until students are 18 years old.

After analyzing the bill, considering other factors that lead to dropout and the results of dropping out, one can conclude that the issue at hand is not the dropout age. The main factor in this issue is the education system itself. Primarily, schools are organized with the assumption that all students are learning on their grade level and have the same learning styles. Also, each level of education is in preparation for the next level of education, all the way through secondary school. This assumes that all students will be prepared for the workforce or for college when they complete high school. Furthermore, this disregards the fact that even after obtaining a degree, the job market may not allow for you to easily obtain a job. In many cases this is compounded by the fact that several students will have student loans. Additionally, this assumes that everyone is going to continue their education after high school. However, traditional school and standardized tests may not be everyone’s forte. It cannot be expected for someone to go to school for a mandatory 12 years and still not be taught skills and trades that can help them be successful outside of school. These are just some of the issues noted after reading this bill and evaluating our education systems.

Will negatively affect a student's future. Bob Keeshan once said,”Children don't drop out of High School when they are 16 they do so in the first grade and wait 10 years to make it official.” Throughout the years studies have shown that in a year 1.2 million students drop out. Which leads that only 25% of High School students during their freshman year fail to graduate. Dropouts in the United States have became a very trending thing we must get to the bottom of this problem. Young adults should not be making these decisions it's time to step in.