Dual Relationships In Forensic Psychology

Kitchener, K. (1988). Dual role relationships: What makes them so problematic?. Journal of Counseling and Development.

The nature of therapist-client relationship and understanding the therapist’s role is vital in making sure that the client’s rights are not jeopardized. The client must be willing to trust the therapist. The therapist can earn the trust of the client will confidentiality guidelines that are established by requiring informed consent. The therapist-client relationship is based on counseling approach as well as relationship with the client. The therapist’s role is to understand the client’s needs, help them get their needs met mentally, and to develop the proper plan that fits the client’s needs. The therapist must fully

This paper will discuss the concept of non-sexual dual relationships between Ms. C and Ms. R., and the ethical consequences of relationships. This paper will also an ethical standard to use a guide when facing a dilemma like Ms. C. In addition to discussing ethical consequences, this paper will also explore how ethical decisions must be made to avoid potentially harmful or exploitive relationships in therapy as well understanding how the Virginia Certificate Board, located in Virginia, may deal with reporting dual relationships, and how different interactions between Ms. C and Ms. R can be understood from an ethical standpoint, as well as preventive measures to avoid dual relationships.

The therapist has to be ready for whatever the outcome of his decision may be. The biggest thing will be the breach of confidentiality, but he is protected by law. It is better for him to report the client to the 3rd party or official and nothing occurs, then to not report the client, and someone

In clinical practice it is wise for mental health professionals to monitor boundary crossing or multiple relationships. These roles have the potential for therapist to use power inappropriately through influence or exploitation of clients. Therefore it is essential to continually monitor the impact of the behavior on clients (Corey et al., 2011). From ethical perspective dual relationships in its self is not a malpractice. The legal aspect depends on the nature of the relationships.

Most major professional codes of ethics have a policy or rule against dual relationships (Gottlieb, 1993). Dual relationships exist when a professional acts at the same time or sequentially in two roles (Gottlieb, 1993). Through the course of this paper, the concept of dual relationships will be examined. Ethical issues with dual relationships will be explained as well as the clarification and analyzation of a specific dual relationship. Not to mention the explanation of challenges presented by boundary issues in professional psychology.

Dual Relationships are dangerous to the client/counselor relationship since it blurs boundaries that must be clear to have a successful, ethical relationship that is centered on the client. A dual relationship can blur the boundaries since other relationships you have with the client will not only not have the clear balance of power that the counselor/client relationship has but will also not have the objectivity and client-centered relationship you must have with them. If you have one relationship with a client as their counselor and another as peer, your relationship with them as a peer can seep into your role as their counselor. In the case of dual relationships, the rule of thumb is “the fewer roles, the better” (p. 565).

The Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct, published by the American Psychological Association are the standard guidelines for all Psychologists. Forensic Psychologists are also informed by Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologist. Psychologists practicing forensic psychology can use these two documents to help clarify ethical questions. This paper will focus on role conflicts specifically in the area of Sex Offender Management and the ethical conflicts that may arise as a result and how to best handle this situation when faced with it. When an individual chooses to practice psychology within the legal system, they must be aware that this can at any point in their career lead to ethical conflicts. Just the possibility

Dual relationships and the ethical behavior that revolves around boundaries with clients present a multitude of very complicated situations to counselors where a clearly defined course of action is not always evident. Aside from no accord amongst mental health professionals and boundary issues being unavoidable at times, recognition and prediction of potential benefits or pitfalls correlated with dual relationships can prove to be troublesome as well (Remley & Herlihy, 2010). For most cases, it is best if an outline is used to discern when it is appropriate for a counselor to breach the client-counselor boundary.

On the other hand, not all outside relationships with a psychologist will create a considerable conflict of interest in court-ordered therapy. For instance, if you attend a large university that your therapist also happens to attend, this may be potentially safe, though it can potentially affect your confidentially, or make you feel very uncomfortable when you meet your psychologist in a public setting. The psychologist is still held by confidentiality, and cannot reveal that you are his or her client. Yet, a client can violate any boundaries without any scolding.

This paper discusses the different roles that are taken on by a forensic psychologist, and how those roles interact and affect each other and how the psychologist is about to do his/her job. It looks briefly at the history of the field. We discuss the forensic psychologist as the consultant, the therapist, the researcher, as well as the expert witness. This paper also discusses predicting dangerousness and whether or not an expert can predict dangerousness. Finally we look at conflicting roles and ethics in the field.

This paper will explore the concept of dual relationships between counselors and clients and the ethical implications of such relationships. In addition to presenting several examples of dual relationships, this paper will also explore how ethical decisions must be made to avoid potentially harmful or exploitive relationships in therapy as well understanding how different interactions between counselor and clients can be understood from an ethical standpoint, as well as how reviewing these ethical dilemmas may shape my future career as a counselor.

Licensed professional counselors have a unique occupation in that not only do they interact with their clients on a highly personal level, but they also momentarily share their client’s burdens, worries, and concerns. This vicarious aspect of counseling creates the possibility for a counselor to continue sharing the client’s troubles long after the session has ended. According to Norcross and Guy (2007), “The person of the psychotherapist is inextricably intertwined with treatment success” (p. 2) meaning that if we desire more positive outcomes than negative ones we must figuratively become one with our clients. Due to this fact, “self-care is not simply a personal matter but also an ethical necessity, a moral imperative” (p. 6). If we fail to leave work at work at the day’s end, then other facets of our lives are in jeopardy of becoming tainted.

In addition, whereas in clinical psychology, there is one 'client' (the subject being treated or analyzed), in forensic psychology, there are many 'clients' (the court, the prosecution/defense, the jury, etc.). Therefore, although by constitution forensic psychological assessments do not vary greatly from clinical forensic assessments, by nature and by virtue of the role they are expected to play in the legal system, they are very different.

Can a therapist be forced to testify in court? We can all be forced by subpoena to get on the stand, but there may be cases where it’s not a subpoena that drags us to the courthouse, but maybe our own self that take us to court, as we make personal decisions to testify on behalf of a client. Say for instance, a client requests a therapist to go to court for them, certainly, we could oblige, however, experts share you may want to remind your client that it is very likely “No good can come from this”. Former member of the APA’s ethics committee, Robert Kinscherff, J.D., P.h.D. says when plaintiffs put their mental health issue in a lawsuit, everything including psychotherapy may be exposed and could backfire as their mental health history is made public. (Bailey, 2003, p.72) So, say for example, your client wants sue their former attorney who represented them in