Dualism Research Paper

In his writings, “A Contemporary Defense of Dualism,” J.P. Moreland argues the point that the mind and brain are separate from each other. It seems as a quick thought that both are the same. However, the mind deals with ideas, thoughts and hopes. The brain is made up of the neural process. Throughout the entire argument, Moreland tries to prove the theory of physicalism, which is the idea that only things that exist are composed of matter. His explanation is that the soul doesn’t exist and the brain controls everything.

In essence, Cartesian Dualism attempts to solve the mind-body problem – that is, what is the relationship between the mind and the body? The answer, according to this theory, is that the mind and the body are two distinctly different substances that constitute each person. Here, “mind” can be described as a nonphysical thing that thinks and “body” as a living physical thing that does not think. The mind can also exist independently of the body, and both can causally affect one another.

The social constructionist theory. Not too long ago did we study this and grace our minds with the reading by Fausto Sterling entitled Dueling Dualism. As a recap can anyone tell me what the four features of a social constructionist approach are? Ah yes so as they said, The four features of a social constructionist perspective are as follows; sex is not given by nature, but is produced, culture, cultural meanings and history play a part in constructing the differences in sex, operations of power, such as big business and medicine, are central to the social construction of sex, and lastly if sex is constructed, then it can be reconstructed. These four constructs apply not only to sex, but to gender and sexuality as well and are the reason that the socially constructed identities or

The defense of dualism stems from two questions. First, is a human being composed of just one ultimate component or two? The second asks if the answer is two, how do these two relate to one another? This idea starts Moreland argument for dualism over physicalism. Physicalism is a worldview that states that

In my mind, dualism is a more attractive view to take when considering the mind-brain issue. The idea that the mind is a separate entity and that it is independent of the physical body is the central point of dualism. One reason it appeals to me is because of my religion, my Catholic upbringing. Introspection is another good reason why dualism is a little more logical to me than materialism.. It logically explains why the mind and brain are separate. Also, the divisibility argument raises good points to allow dualism to appear to be the more attractive idea in my eyes.

At the start, I will talk about the argument from the religion aspect for dualism. Most major world religions are based on separating the ‘mind’ and ‘body’. The eternal ‘mind’ or soul either ends up in heaven or hell, free from the ‘body’ itself. According to a number of religions, there is some sort of life after you die; a good example of this is angels which some call the ‘mind’ of god exists without any physical presence. This is what we come to know as substance dualism or something that is very relative to a form of substance dualism. As a result, "seeing how uncertain dualism is, in principle, the similar would be a willing to also be uncertain in one 's religious tradition, which a lot of people find challenging to do". [Churchland] Yet, it must

Classical dualism has a few points that are unclear. Swinburne says that you have a body under your control. The case presented of having your old mind in a new body and brain is questionable. Will you still have your morality in your new body and brain? Will you still have the same calling as you did in your old body and brain? Will you still have the same religious beliefs? These are all points that Swinburne failed to debate.

There are several arguments to argue that the mind and body are not separate substances. And also, this is especially true in the face of its many different views, one of which does not attack substance dualism directly, but does so indirectly by attacking the very idea of dualism itself. The argument begins by looking at the question of how dualism became so popular. It claims that, firstly, it had to do with the fact that the great majority of Western philosophers around the time when the dualism was at its peak were religious, and most of them are specifically of the Christian faith. Thus, one feature of their religious beliefs was to believe in immortality, and in order to settle their belief with their philosophy, they had to support dualism; the reason being that it was very difficult to believe in immorality without believing in dualism.

     For centuries philosophers have debated on monism and dualism, two different philosophical views of the human person. Philosophers have been trying to decipher whether the person is made up of the mind, the body, or both. Monists hold the belief that existence is purely based upon one ultimate “category of being” this means that either the person is made up of only the body or only the mind (Morris p155). Dualists hold the belief that existence is based upon the body as well as the mind and its mental properties (Morris p155).

A substance is a kind or type of being or existence. A substance, in contrast to a property, is self-standing, whereas a property can logically only exist as belonging to a substance. For example, a substance can be an object such as a human-body, where a property is only a quantifiable attribute of said body, such as the body’s height and/or weight. Moreover, throughout recorded human-history, there has been an ongoing debate regarding the number of substances that actually exist. Generally speaking, people fall into two different camps: monists and dualists. A monist holds the position that reality is only made up of one kind of substance; monists may differ in what this one substance actually is, but they can nonetheless agree that there is only one type of substance in existence. Contrarily, a dualist holds the position that reality is made up of more than one kind of substance. Dualists have classified reality into two distinct substances: physical substance(s) and mental substance(s). Physical substances are

You bring up some interesting points. Firstly, as I pointed out in my original post, I do not think “chemical imbalances and defects in the brain that cause a mental change in a person are considered mental illness”. Rather, I would consider them neurological defects that, given the proper tools and/or medicine (possibly technology that we have not yet been able to create or invent yet), can be corrected to average or “normal” levels.

In the same way, even if the mind fails the body remains strong. An example of that is a person with Alzheimer disease. However, Dualism comes with a problem called Interactionism. For example, if we hit our thumb with a hammer, a physical event, it will cause us pain which is a mental event. And then we might

Dualism covers the issue that is concerned with the connection between the mind and the brain, and whether humans are composed of all physical matter or contain a mind along with a physical body. Dualism is the belief that humans have both a non-physical mind along with a physical body. There are two types of dualism, which include Substance Dualism and Property Dualism. Substance Dualism claims the mind exists independently from the body, and Property Dualism claims the brain causes the mind into existence. When compared to the other beliefs mentioned prior, Dualism provides strong arguments made by René Descartes and Gottfried Leibniz that help us understand and answer the questions previously mentioned. The main differences between Substance Dualism and Property Dualism are not far

There is a little-known parallel universe beneath the veneer of what is often referred to as conventional vanilla society. This is the REAL Fetish world of extreme deviancy and kink, a joyous world of unapologetic hedonism, impenetrable to the average person and is only ever accessible through trusted personal contacts. I’J a part of that hidden universe... Let me tell you about myself.

The thought of Dualism implied that there were two different things when it went to the cerebrum and the psyche. It implied that there was your body as one thing and your spirit which controlled everything the body did. In examining the mind and its parts, we now realize that every structure in the cerebrum controls your contemplation and your practices. We additionally now realize that there are diverse areas in the mind that control tactile data, for example, torment, touch, notice, hearing, and vision. In the wake of looking into the mind, we have found that the left half of the cerebrum controls the right half of the body and the right half of the mind controls the left half of the body. We additionally realize that there are chemicals