Duke Lacrosse Argumentative Essay

In the video “The Confessions” presented by Frontline, a murder of a women that was committed by one man, quickly resulted into a false gang murder-rape scene committed by eight men. The victim, Michelle Bosko, was seen to be raped and killed in her apartment in Norfolk, Virginia. From the video, it has been proven that seven out of the eight men that confessed were innocent, but somehow they all received an unequal punishment. Because the innocent men admitted to a murder that they didn’t commit out of fear, they were all sentenced to some time in prison. The head detective, Glenn Ford, intimidated the men so much that they either were convinced that they were at the crime scene or they told him every detail that he wanted to hear.

Indeed, who would have predicted ten years ago? That women's basketball so wildly popular? Well, people who have watched the growth of women's basketball in southern states. The enormous campus arenas at the state universities in Tennessee, North Carolina, and Georgia filled to capacity for home games. The coach for Tennessee's Lady Vols, Pat Summitt. She has achieved nearly godlike stature in that state. A tall, striking figure on- and off-court. Summitt commands respect. Wherever she goes. My youngest sister, Ruth Ann, who lives in Tennessee. She says you can't near Pat Summitt after a game. "You'd think she a rock star," she says. Although Geno Auriemma, Coach of the UConn women's team. Not yet enjoying that kind of support. He rapidly becoming

Mr. Nifong from the beginning of the investigation seemed to have his mind set on convicting these white males of the allegations they faced from the accuser. The unethical manner in which Mike Nifong proceeded in the investigation tested the judicial system. The tactics that were used in the case undermined that you are innocent until proven guilty. A Duke was facing a crisis little did the judicial system in North Carolina know that they were about to have their work cut out for them as Mr. Nifong continued his journey to find these three lacrosse players guilty. According to

There were several sub issues found during this case, the first being that Mike Pressler, the Duke University Lacrosse team coach was forced to resign when faced with the possibility of several of his players being charged with rape. Sub issue two is that one lacrosse player, Ryan McFayden, sent a private email to his teammates threatening to kill strippers which was later found to be a quote from the film American Psycho. Sub issue three is that the way that District Attorney, Mike Nifong handled the case was the way that socio-economically disadvantaged accused and accused of color are handled often nationally. False evidence is placed in the case, or evidence is omitted, to charge otherwise innocent

I have been playing lacrosse ever since I was 8 years old. It has been a really fun and time consuming sport. The object of the game is to score by shooting the ball in the opposing team's goal using a shaft preferably made from; wood, aluminum, or titanium, that size ranges from about 40 inches to 42 inches for offensive players and size ranges from about 52 inches to 72 inches for defensive players. This sport may sound similar to another sport known as football. Football is played with an oval sized ball made from rubber, weaved with laces that size ranges from about 27 cm long and 60 cm in circumference at its widest point. Which brings me to my claim, “Is Lacrosse better than Football?”. I personally think that it is, this is of course

How would you feel to give yourself to a collegiate organization, strive to succeed, bring in huge amounts of revenue, and recognition of your college institute and not receive a or dime for their Entertaining contribution? Well, this is the same question that Shipnuck and Alan asked themselves when they wrote this article in support of collegiate athlete payment. For O Bannon just the opportunity to play his favorite sport at the college level and shine was all the compensation he ever needed, but he “has gladly taken up the fight in the most important piece of litigation in the history of collegiate athletics. O’Bannon v. NCAA seeks to establish a form of revenue sharing that would give a slice of the pie to the athletes who, up until now,

Into the Wild written by Jon Krakauer illustrates the life and death of Christopher McCandless, and his search for the true meaning in life. McCandless’ family was well-off and he graduated from Emory University with honors. Everything in McCandless’ life came easy, and because of this he wished to find what it meant to work for something. Through his perilous journey across the United States, McCandless found a way to inspire others everywhere he went. His independent and carefree mindset inspired other adventure seekers. Because McCandless desired to push the status-quo, he trades material wealth in order to find the richness in life.

The game of football is being attacked. We see it every day in the headlines and on the news. The medical concerns are obvious. The game has taken more than its share of criticism. Even President Barack Obama said that if he had boys he wouldn’t let them play football. LeBron James publicly said no football in his house. So the question is asked all the time, Why would anyone want to play football? And why would anyone let their kids play? Here’s my answer. I believe there’s practically no other place where a boy is held to a higher standard then football. Football is hard, it’s tough, it demands discipline, it teaches obedience, it builds character. Football is a metaphor for life.

McCulloch V. Maryland is the crucial debate of 1819 in regards to expand the Federal power. This debate was over Congress establishing a bank effecting the powers of the state and federal government. However, James W. McCulloch refused to pay the taxes for the Second National Bank chartered by the Congress. Therefore Maryland filed a lawsuit against McCulloch causing distress. The Supreme Court states that chartering a bank is an implied power of the Constitution. But what is implied powers? Implied powers are powers that Congress exercise in the Constitution but somehow exists due to the expressed powers stated in Article 1. And who has the power of chartering a bank? Both the national and state government has the power of being able to charter banks, borrow money and build roads etc. This is an example of concurrent powers. This means that both the state and national government can have similar types of power but can be fought against. Both governments must work together to resolve the issue.

Housing and racial discrimination of the 1950's and 1960's can not start without the discussion of the great migration of African Americans. African Americans left the south and moved to the north to large cities like Portland, Detroit, Seattle and topic at hand Chicago. In search of new lives and to avoid tough segregation laws blacks flooded the Chicago area. According to online reports more than 6 million African Americans moved up north from 1916 to 1970. The mistreatment of the southerners and segregation alone was a huge incentive for African Americans to leave the south.

The Duke Lacrosse team’s story illustrates how a single lie can set off a storm of racial and status related tension that has been simmering for years. The events that took place can be best described by the ideas associated with the Conflict Theory Approach to socialization. The clash of white versus black, rich versus poor, and privileged or entitled versus normal, made this the perfect opportunity for media outlets to shed light on this idea of entitlement in society. Ultimately, turning what was supposed to be a criminal investigation into a full on status war within Durham, North Carolina and communities across the nation. This snap judgment of guilt that was portrayed throughout the media without the presence of facts or real evidence,

Many families encounter the worst of sports related injuries, such as being paralyzed or even death upon playing. The NCHSAA should be more cautious upon high school athletics and make it a safer environment towards all contenders within the divisions. It is not the NCHSAA fault upon injuries, but they can make the biggest improvement upon sports to try and prevent many risky injuries. Kids will go through the pain of an injury, not to only sit and get ready to play again, but to learn an important lesson.

Even after a defendant has been convicted, prosecutors have an ethical, sometimes legal, duty to preserve a copy of discovery material as well as physical evidence. The prosecutor has an ethical duty to make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of their right to have an attorney present in court. They also have an ethical, legal and constitutional duty to disclose most of the evidence they possess to the defendant once the defendant has been charged with a crime. However, the individual rights of the defendant must be upheld, even if this means that the prosecutor does not obtain a conviction.

Every Sunday during football season, there is one place I will always be, no matter what. As I drive down Lake Cook Road, I feel a sudden excitement. Sundays are my favorite day of the week because I get to not only spend time with my grandparents, but also watch our favorite Chicago sports team play for three hours. I have watched every single Bears game with my grandparents since I was eight. We have been through it all, from Rex Grossman as our quarterback to Marc Trestman as our head coach. However, recently, I have noticed something about our conversations during the games. We always debate whether the Bears should keep Jay Cutler next season. He has always proven to be turnover-prone, but has been clutch throughout the season. The Chicago Bears should keep Jay Cutler next season because he has proven to be one of the better quarterbacks in the NFL.

The relationship between law enforcement and prosecutors, which goes hand-in-hand, can’t be overlooked. Evidence of a crime that detectives and law enforcement discover is as equally important as a good trial on part of the prosecution. If detectives aren’t able to find good solid evidence – that case usually isn’t bothered in being pursued. Several years ago, in the late 80’s, there was a murder case in Southeastern Oklahoma which now serves as a tragic example to the need for honest, constitutional work in the criminal justice system. Disreputable investigative procedures, fraudulent sources, and bad evidence were the foundation of this case that shattered innocent lives.