Dulce et Decorum Est Essay

“Facing it” by Yusef Komunyakaa and “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen, are two powerful poems with the graphical life like images on the reality of war. It is apparent that the authors was a soldier who experienced some of the most gruesome images of World War I. In “Ducle et Decorum Est” Owen tells us about a personal experience in which he survived a chemical warfare attack. Although he survives, some of his fellow troops do not. As in “Facing It” Komunyakaa is also a soldier who has survived a war. Komunyakaa response to his war experience is deeply shaped by his visit to Lin’s memorial. Inspired by the monument, Komunyakaa confronts his conflicted feelings about Vietnam, its legacy, and even more broadly, the part race plays in

Owen’s poem: “Dulce Et Decorum Est” describes what horrible fates soldiers could meet when they least expect it. This poem takes place in the trenches of the warfront with Owen describing his first hand experiences. He and some other soldiers are marching through the trenches, wet, dirty and fatigued all while the sounds of gunfire and artillery are constant. Suddenly, from the silence and the slow pace of the soldiers, a gas attack begins and Owen describes the scene as being “an ecstasy of fumbling” as they put on their gas masks just in time, however, not everyone was fast enough and Owen says “someone still was yelling out and stumbling, and floundering like a man on fire or lime… Dim, through the misty panes and thick green light, as under a green sea, I saw him drowning”. The aim of this poem Is to juxtapose the idea that it is sweet and honorable to die for one’s country when in reality, at least for this soldier, it was not, he dies in agony, with no hope of being saved, as he takes more and more breaths he comes closer to death. This juxtaposition is continued as Owen describes how the body of the man is treated, “If In smothering dreams you too could pace behind the wagon we

Rupert McCall and Wilfred Owens are two very different poets, from two very different times, with two very different poems. The two poems give very different messages about the poet’s opinion of war and conflict. Ninety Years Ago is a poem written by Rupert McCall in 2005 about the legend of the ANZACs. The poem was written to commemorate the 90th anniversary of the Gallipoli campaign. Dulce Est Decorum Et was written by Owen Wilfred in 1917 about Owens experiences in WW1. Owen wrote this poem as an antiwar message describing the horrors that he went through.

In Wilfred Owen’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” the speaker’s argument against whether there is true honor in dieing for ones country in World War I contradicts the old Latin saying, Dulce et Decorum Est, which translated means, “it is sweet and honorable to die for the fatherland”; which is exemplified through Owen’s use of title, diction, metaphor and simile, imagery, and structure throughout the entirety of the poem.

Poetry composers evoke ideas of truth to help individuals and readers understand their ideas that have been portrayed through their work. Wilfred Owen was a war poet who served in world war one. In Owens poems of “Dulce Et Decourm Est” and “Anthem for Doomed youth”. Both poems explore the ideas of meaningless sacrifice and suffering as wells as the horrors of war. Owen used many poetic techniques to help him convey his ideas of war.

In the poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen, it is very tragic and full of anti-war thoughts. In “Who’s for the Game?” by Jessie Pope, the author is pro-war because she talks about feeling the rush in war. The poems are very different from each other and both have a lot of good points. The mood and tone are very different and the author's ideas differ. They are both going to give you a different side on the war, weather you should or shouldn't go to war.

The poems I have chosen to compare in this essay are Wilfred Owen's “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and Jessie Pope's “Who's For The Game?”. The two poems I have chosen to compare are both about the first world war. Yet the two poems have very different opinions on the Great War. My first poem, Dulce et decorum, is against the war and the injustice of it all. It is narrated by one of the soldiers who is fighting in the Great War and having to face the horrors of war. On the contrary my second poem, Who's for the game, is a recruitment poem.

This poem is what I think one of the best poems I have ever hear and

How does war make you feel? Imagine how soldiers feel during the war and after, they have had to watch many innocent people suffer and die, maybe even their own friends. Both poems “Dulce et D Decorum Est” and “Who’s for the Game?” give readers a sense of what soldiers see and how they feel. War never fully leaves the soldiers even after they are not in battle anymore. Both poems give readers a little bit of the soldiers point of view and show how soldiers have to be brave even though they may be scared but who is actually up to fight. I believe the poems are supposed to give readers the effect of sadness and fright maybe just thinking of what soldiers have to endure but also makes them think about if they would be brave enough to fight themselves.

In his poem, “Dulce Et Decorum Est” poet Wilfred Owen utilizes horrific imagery, angry and disgusted tones, and a contrasting title to engage readers.

just heard it and already almost had it memorized. It is a beautiful poem that has a meaning

Wilfred Owen wrote Dulce et Decorum Est about the first World War, in which he had personally fought. It was addressed to Jessie Pope, a writer of other poems concerning the War. Specifically he wrote the poem to counteract her poem “Who’s For The Game?”.

Within in society, there is a huge debate on whether war is heroism or just a tragedy. In “Dulce et Decorum Est” author Wilfred Owen has hands on experienced the battlefield and what it truly has to offer. Owen elaborates on how the war is unnecessary and has many cons for soldiers as well as for the people watching at home. He contributes his own experience and how it is not a relief to kill your enemy, you are killing a real person. Next, Owen feels irritated that kids at home are idolizing everything war has to give. Moreover, kids and people respect what the war gives to our country and are attentive to every detail on the television. Additionally, in a war everyone eventually changes and not for the better, but for the worst, no one

Wilfred Owen’s Dolce et Decorum Est and Carol Ann Duffy’s The Last Post are both refusals of war propaganda and intended to convey an anti war message to populations at war. Both texts use the point of view of a poet Wilfred Owen’s being from a veteran. However, both speaks clearly convey a message desiring change, and a greater understanding of the horrors of war within the general population. Owen’s first stanza is a myriad of techniques, beginning with similes and metaphors describing the worn-out soldiers firstly as “beggars” then as “hags”, dehumanizing them just as the war does. Similarly, Duffy’s poem in which she directly quotes from Dulce et Decorum Est bleeding men are described as “slime into its wounds” Duffy has completely dehumanized the men describing them

This poem appealed to me as it had a meaning, which could be seen just by reading the poem.