preview

Dummon's Case Summary

Decent Essays

Family testimony for Wenborn with unacceptable behaviors like breaking, running into fires, and making unusual sounds showed his potential danger and destruction in the home environment. For example, tearing of parents’ clothes was said to indicate insanity. In this particular instance, Wenborn was a chronic case that was shown as dangerous and was subjectively admitted after five years at home. Luddington’s case stated that he looked strange, was built poorly, and could not speak or understand well. He was neglected by his family but not actually insane, and his community wanted to admit him for his own safety. Therefore, no specific symptoms implying any sign of mental illness were recorded. Nevertheless, the child seemed to have a family history, as his mother, father, and uncle were all insane and his grandmother was epileptic. He was also labeled as always being in trouble and very scrawny for his age, so he would not have been considered a productive member of society. …show more content…

A person with a disability that is also perceived as an ascetic failure can be grouped into three different categories: inhuman, entertainment, and menacing. So, if a person looks strange or extremely different from the “typical person,” he or she probably suffers from a mental illness according to previous beliefs about disabilities. In Luddington’s case, he was said to have looked outlandish, which helped him become admitted into the asylum. Therefore, he could have been considered an aesthetic failure because of how he was described. Wenborn is also explained as having the looks and actions of an idiot, which shows that he could also be considered an aesthetic

Get Access