ELITE Team Development

Tuckman in his "Stages of Development' model identified 5 stages of team formation: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (CIPP, Unit 1). Based on his analysis and characteristics of each stage it becomes possible to recognise that the team has reached the stage of 'Performing'. According to Tuckman it is the final stage of development when a team is fully functioning and produces its 'best work'. The main features of the ‘Performing’ stage are (CIPP, Unit

For example, effective team development can often help a team to speed through the stages to becoming a high-performing team. The stages are “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing” and, more recently, “reforming”.

Throughout the readings communication was identified as a vital component for establishing and maintaining relationships. Porter-O Grady sanctioned for leaders to establish firm rules of engagement to help support a positive group dynamic (2013). While Kelly & Tazbir explained that friction and conflict were a normal part of group development and were representative of the Storming stage of group process (2014). Moreover, they explained that with assistance from the team leader the team can overcome these obstacles, strengthen inter-professional relationships, and enter into the Norming stage (Kelly & Tazbir, 2014). Here the team is able to participate in the effective exchange of communication and begin making progress toward goals. This represents progression into the Performing stage of group process (Kelly & Tazbir, 2014). When the team has met its intended target they are ready to anylze the outcomes of their work and enter the final stage of group process—Adjourning (Kelly & Tazbir,

The features of effective team performance are set out in Brian Tuckman’s phases of team development theory, ‘Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing.’ This outlines the phases that a team will go through in order to become effective and reach maturity. At the ‘Forming’ stage of team development individual roles and responsibilities are unclear and each member of the team is concerned to avoid conflict with each other. From this point the team will go through the ‘Storming’ phase which is when they start to conflict as individuals put forward ideas which will be challenged by others in a bid to gain power and position over others. After this the ‘Norming’ phase follows and it is at this point that individual roles are defined and accepted

Stage one of his model is the Forming stage, where the leader must be prepared to answer many questions about the team’s purpose and objectives. Usual team processes are often ignored and there is also a high dependence on

There will always be different opinions and disageements with team members. The best way to deal with disagreements is to know what each team member role is, and to have a plan put in place to deal with any disagreements. The first metod would the four main stages of team development. Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing. Later a fifth stage of Adjourning/Transforming can be added. The forming is the initial phase of team building, members are ambiguous about their roles, rules, norms, and expectations from them (Kumar, 2014). Also, the next step is, storming where members tend to get into competitiveness, defensiveness, protectiveness, and conflict over roles and personalities; members may become critical of the leader and of each other (Kumar, 2014). Also, in norming members get to know each other, agree on the norms, working styles and systems to follow (Kumar, 2014). In performing the teams works with positive and inspired attitude to accomplish their goals. Finally, in adjourning, after completion of the team tasks, members bring a sense of closure and a connection between members (Kumar, 2014). The second building method would be Mentoring and coaching skills are a must for leaders and managers. Furthermore, in

As a team leader it is the goal to have the group perform well and as quickly as possible and work through their differences. Many studies suggest that interprofessional teams do not perform effectively due to friction, hostility, and barriers to knowledge sharing (Mitchell, Parker, & Giles, 2011). Forming a team usually is recognized by the stages known as forming, storming, norming, and performing (Mind Tools, 2012). Formatting an agenda that includes expectations, rules, and

The author examines four stages of group development that allows the emerging member to discern purpose, role, and collective views. In stage one, dependency and inclusion marks a member’s reliance on the leader or other extroverted members. In stage two counter dependency and fighting is expected as members seek liberation from their leader and strive to merge their goals. In stage three, trust and structure begin as clarity of goals and relationship building take root. In stage four, members have surpassed the hindrances of lower team functioning such as dissatisfaction of roles, and have embraced goal achievement and task accomplishment. In this final stage, “teams are highly cohesive and can expect to be successful” (Wheelan, 2016, p. 29). That said, the author informs

The five stages of team development were first introduced by Bruce Wayne Tuckman in 1965. His research into the way teams function and coordinate provided reoccurring trends towards very specific points in the life of a team, which became the premises of each of the first four “Tuckman’s Stages.” The fifth stage was co-created by Mary Ann Jensen over a decade later. The five stages discussed in this essay are as follows: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing, and Adjourning.

During the forming stage, the group takes considerable direction from the group’s leader, as the roles of the other team members are yet to be defined. Members of this group have their guard up, are on their best behavior and/or feeling anxious or nervous.

Work Team development is a dynamic and often difficult process. Most teams find themselves in a continuos state of change and development. Eventhough, most teams never reach full stability, there is a general pattern that describes how most teams evolve. There are five stages of team development, the first stage is forming. In this stage there is a great deal of uncertainty about the teams purpose, structure and leadership. Members are testing the the waters to determine what types of behaviors are acceptable. This stage is complete when members began to think of themselves as part of the team. The second stage is called storming. In this stage there is much intragroup conflict.Team members accept the existence of the team, but there is resistance to the control that the team imposes on individuality. Conflict can arise from numerous sources within the team setting but generally falls into three categories:communication, factors, structural factors and personal factors (Varney, 1989/Townsley). In addition, there is conflict over who will control the team.

The Lumen team’s success is derived from their manager, Max Cooper. The company is going through a tumultuous time, and his team is leading in performance and satisfaction. He effectively has fostered motivation through keeping the roles of the team fluid, valued equity from all parties, and created camaraderie among different personalities.

4. There are several things Wilson should do in preparation for the meeting with division managers. The most important one is to “define a goal in clear and elevating way” (2). While goal is very clear, Dixon took away an opportunity to define goal in the elevating way. Still, Wilson should make sure that team members can clearly see their relevance to the goal.

Generally, the team dynamics are good and the team works well together since the members know each other’s strengths and weaknesses. Looking at the team from the context of Tuckman’s model of team development, I believe that the team is past the forming, storming, and norming stages, and we are now at the performing phase. The performing stage is usually characterized with optimal task attainment and a high level of cohesion, collaboration, and communication as well as genuine pride in the successes of the team (Management training Australia, 2015). Everyone within the team is strategically aware and understands what the team is doing and what is expected of them. The leader delegates activities with minimum supervision and members within the team look after one another. Although disagreements may arise every now and then, the team is now mature enough to attend to such disagreements and solve them in a positive way. The following are the team members;

Secondly, high performing teams understood where they were, where they are going and how they were going to get there and it was all linked to goals. Successful teams set achievable goals and create a road map on how to follow them with goals in between and beyond the company’s mission statement. In setting team goals they ensure to set individual goals that begin by defining the roles of each individual on the team. Successful managers clearly express expectations and ensure individual goals align with team goals which result in alignment with company goals (Abdallah & Ahluwalia, 2013). When teams met, meetings were highly organized and managers were able to seamlessly move from person to person and accurately gage where each members contributions stood in relation to team and corporate goals. Members were highly engaged and involved with each other, collaborating and assisting each other with completing tasks.