EU Essay

The outcome of the Brexit referendum in June last year came as a surprise to a lot of people, though surveys showed that the outcome would be close. It was predicted that ‘Remain' would win with a tight majority, yet, politicians underestimated the resentment British citizens had cultivated against the perceived domination of the European Union. Citizens voted to win back sovereignty, but as the recent negotiations show the United Kingdom has won anything but that. This essay analyses how the EU dominates Britain in the divorce negotiations by employing John Scott's theory of structures of domination. Access to the single market is the main incentive the EU offers Britain for accepting their conditions of the Brexit. This characterises the EU as the

Immigration – the UK does not have enough control over its borders. Under the current EU’s fundamental right of free movement, any citizen of a member state is permitted to move and work in the UK without first obtaining a visa, and in some circumstances, access to benefits. Additionally, the migrant crisis that has found its way to the UK’s doorstep in Calais, France has created a cause for concern as migrants endlessly try to make it to UK soil and claim asylum. By leaving the EU, Brexiters argue, the UK government will have the power necessary to stop and control the migrant invasion.

     After the tragedies of World War II, European leaders have made striving efforts to prevent such a catastrophic event from occurring on their continent again. The best solution seemed to be highly mechanized cooperation among the highest European powers to assure that future conflict, and perhaps war, could not arise between them. If all the states ran themselves in a manner cooperating with their neighbors, conflict could be avoided. To prevent other nations from not cooperating, treaties and institutions would have to be designed for each area of international interest such as trade, communications, security, and so forth. As the century progressed, more organizations, institutions and associations were

Firstly, it must be established exactly why withdrawing from the EU would be a poor decision for the UK to make. This will be accomplished by critically assessing the main arguments for withdrawal in order to remove the gild that the public’s misinformed perception has coated these arguments in, which has led to recent polls finding that a “Vote today would see Britain exiting [the] EU” (Orb International, 2014, cited in Shipman, 2014).

One of the central themes of the EU debate revolves around the issue of national sovereignty. The European project has always involved, to a certain extent, the relinquishing of some national sovereignty, but in trying to persuade Europe’s established nations to cede powers to a European centre, often without the consultation of the general public, has created a growing eurosceptic backlash, a narrative that has been well received in Britain.

It has been argued that the free movement of workers is a “European core value that has time and time again proved to enhance (Europe’s) economical dynamism and attractiveness worldwide.” It can be said that EU citizenship has benefitted Member States and their people greatly due to the establishment of the Internal Market and has thus has been beneficial to the overall European economy. When considering the overall effect of EU citizenship on the free movement of workers, the individual concepts of EU citizenship and the free movement of workers must be looked at. This then allows a comparison to be made to non EU citizens, permitting a view

There are several benefits that Britain has been enjoying as a member country of EU. Besides that, there have also been problems that Britain has been facing due to its membership in the EU and that are why the country is contemplating on its move of trying to distance itself or rather itself from the EU. The first benefit that has been enjoyed is employment. According to the current statistics, the EU has over three million people or jobs that directly rely on Britain 's membership of the EU. For instance, if trade and investments fell post-Brexit, the some of these jobs would be lost, and if it would have happened the opposite, then there would have been the creation of new jobs. Another reason is that Britain’s economy has been booming mostly because most of its biggest trading partners are the EU member state countries mainly German and France. More than fifty percent of the Britain’s export goes to the EU countries besides that, the country’s membership allows the traders to control how the trading rules are drawn up. Over 1.4 Britons have also been able to move and live abroad in the EU, furthermore, the driving license issued by the UK government in all the member states of the EU. The European Union (EU) has played a crucial role in the fighting of crime in England. This has because the European arrest warrants cut out the need for long and complicated extradition procedures and thus, this has allowed the criminals

After the tragedies of World War II, European leaders have made striving efforts to prevent such a catastrophic event from occurring on their continent again. The best solution seemed to be highly mechanized cooperation among the highest European powers to assure that future conflict, and perhaps war, could not arise between them. If all the states ran themselves in a manner cooperating with their neighbors, conflict could be avoided. To prevent other nations from not cooperating, treaties and institutions would have to be designed for each area of international interest such as trade, communications, security, and so forth. As the century progressed, more organizations, institutions and associations were developed and soon leaders

Winston Churchill called for the concept of a “kind of United States of Europe”, and with an ever-closer European Union both with tenacious economic and political ties, his call is materialising by the day. Though favoured by Churchill, the high European migrant levels and the erosion of Britain’s sovereignty has led to the questioning of the so-called ‘European super-state’. Britain voting ‘out’ on the 23rd. June would result in ‘Brexit’ and subsequently an end to free trade with its European counterparts. This would release her from the shackles of tariffs and quotas that are present for non-EU trade, leading to potential trade deals with Eastern countries such as China. Further to ones discussion with Britain being EUs second largest

The results of the referendum were staggering, as the citizens of the United Kingdom vocalized their desire for change at the emotional level. People felt as though the European Union, with its relaxed attitude towards state borders, would open the gate to continuous immigration and taint the cultural identity of the United Kingdom. Britains in support of Brexit believe in this idea of immigration being the root of the problem with the EU. In the midst of the financial crash of 2008, the entire Eurozone has had difficulty getting back off the ground and many of the countries in its borders turned towards the UK for financial compensation in the form of jobs (Lee). In 2015 the United Kingdom took about 330,000 new people into the state, living and working among the people already established there (Lee). A professor at London’s School of Economics states in regards to immigration affecting the Brexit vote, that “there’s a feeling that we’re losing our cultural identity and our national identity” he also hypothesizes that so many cultures impending in one place mixed with an “influx of people willing to work for low wages” drives the above feeling home, into the lives of native citizens of the UK (Taub). When people who come into the country are willing to work for less money stay and find jobs, they

The Brexit Vote also defined a complex new set of nationalist principles, which were based on the “turning back the clock” of racial identity in the pre-EU global order. For instance, the re-emergence of nationalism was also being defined by a the Anglo-Saxon “purity” of cultural and racial traditions, which undermined the tensions behind the Brexit Vote. In this manner, the perception of job losses in England also exacerbated racial tensions in relation to the immigration crisis across Europe. Many British citizens felt that a lack of regulatory process in EU immigration policy threatened their job security due to the lower wages being paid for immigrant worker:

Focusing on two of the points freedom of movement and regulations, let’s see how these will be impacted from a Brexit.

A national identity for all nation states has become increasingly more difficult to define in the last 20 years. With the rise of technology and globalisation the European Union has been increasingly beneficial (not without its faults) for the countries within it. Especially when it comes to trade and freedom of movement in an area less than 100 years ago was ravaged with war. Brexit should have been a question of the UK’s position in the European union and the world. However, it caused a deep division around immigration and multiculturalism across class, age, socio-economic status and ethnic background. Timothy Oliver firmly believes that the UK need to fix its “identity crisis” before Brexit negotiations, whilst subtly suggesting that Brexit was a bad idea in the first place.

Envision a place, any place in the world, where people come and go, a serene environment that collaborates with the surrounding areas, all around living in unison. These places help each other like a well-oiled machine, when one country is down it is up to the others to help it get to its rightful place. Think of this as a union. But, then envision just one of the collaborating countries feeling the need to leave or break away from this union damaging not only the structure of the union but the overall welfare of their own nation. Think of this as an exit. This example given above is an example of the European Union when it first started but then Britain trying to break away from it because of the so called “economic defects” it has caused but in reality, Britain’s departure from the European Union will gravely affect the overall state of their nation.

During his State of the European Union address on September 13, European Commission President Jean- Claude Junker called for additional inclusion of the Balkan group of member states, stating that “It is high time to bring Romania and Bulgaria into the Schengen area” and that the “EU must offer credible membership prospects to Western Balkans.” This, however, seemed only to be the begging of his intention for certain countries, such as Bulgaria, which is heavily vetted to become a member of the Eurozone. This effort seems to be supported by Euro-zone leaders, such as Macron and Merkel. They both manifested their interest in helping Bulgaria join the ERM-2 mechanism (commonly referred to as the “waiting room” for the Euro) during Bulgarian