preview

Eaarth Bill Mckibben Summary

Decent Essays
Open Document

In the first chapter of Eaarth, the author, Bill Mckibben, discusses the differences between the “old” earth, compared to the “new” earth. Further, on the one hand, Mckibben describes the old earth as a less industrialized, but more stable planet; and, on the other hand, Mckibben describes the new earth as a highly developed, but deteriorating planet. It appears that Mckibben attributes the destruction of the planet to climate change. More specifically, Mckibben describes the circumstances under which human civilization lived under for ten thousand years, and compares it to how the conditions of the earth has drastically changed over just four decades; conditions which we currently live under today. Further, Mckibben (2010) describes how humans were able to build civilizations near stable and tame seas and water sources, build communities at high altitudes, and rely upon a predictable weather pattern to enhance their farming abilities (p. 11). Conversely, Mckibben provides accounts from people worldwide describing the devastating conditions that they are experiencing today (i.e. hotter temperatures for a longer period of time, more …show more content…

Mckibben attributes this to the growth of economy in today’s world. More specifically, the era of Industrial Revolution began around year 1760, and quickly affected the growth of economy worldwide. Since that time, the economy has only continued to grow exponentially and does not appear to show signs of slowing down. The majority of the automobiles we use, and factories that we built, emit CO2 and other harmful chemicals which has polluted our atmosphere, and began the events that occurring worldwide and which we attribute to climate change. Essentially, the earth can no longer support the rate at which our economy has continued to

Get Access