Earl Warren Accomplishments

He attended the University of Chicago and after serving in the Navy he attended the Northwestern University Law School and graduated with the highest grades in the law school history. He has been married twice and has a son and three daughters from his first wife.

After graduating in 1926, Thurgood attended Lincoln University in Pennsylvania. This was a historically black college. After graduating, with honors, from Lincoln, in 1930, he applied to the University of Maryland Law School. He was overqualified with his academics, but was turned away because of his race. This experience with discrimination in education stayed with Marshall and helped determine his career. Insted of Maryland, Thurgood attended Howard University in Washington

Chief Justice Earl Warren joined the courts right amidst a standout amongst the most imperative issues, racial isolation in government funded schools. His commitment to racial fairness still stands as a demonstration of his part as an uncommon pioneer. Racial isolation was by all account not the only thing that the Warren Courts affected; it ensured individuals ' first Amendment rights and also blended up criminal method. The Warren Court extended social equality, common freedoms, legal force, and government power. Chief Justice Earl Warren could accomplish more than generally presidents.

Earl Warren was born in Los Angeles in 1891 to parents of Norwegian and Swedish descent. When his father, a longtime railroad worker for the Southern Pacific Railroad, was laid off due to his involvement

Speaking out in favor of placing Japanese-Americans in camps for the remainder of the war, at the time Earl Warren thought that was the best thing to do. He had heard military intelligence state that Japanese-American fishermen, who often went out into the Pacific Ocean at night, might be signaling enemy submarines. While he had qualms about abrogating the civil rights of Japanese-Americans, he was also a patriot who wanted to support the war effort.

In the time that Earl Warren was in command of the Supreme Court, cases such as Miranda vs Arizona, increased our right on accusations. With the Miranda vs Arizona case, Earl Warren made a lasting impact by winning the case and creating what we now

Thurgood Marshall - well known for his victory in the U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka - has died at the age of 84. Marshall’s education, determination, and appreciation for the United States Constitution and the rule of law are paramount factors which led him to become one of the most accomplished African Americans during the civil rights era. He played a key role in advancing equality for African-American men and women in the United States.

Earl Warren was a politician and eventually a renown jurist. He served as the 30th Governor of California and the 14th Chief Justice of the U.S. As the 14th Chief Justice, he was in charge of the Warren Court, now known as one of the most liberal courts in the history of the U.S. Warren led landmark decisions like Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Reynolds v. Sims, and Miranda v. Arizona that strengthened the power of the judicial branch to be in par with the other two branches. Warren and his court desegregated public schools and other public sectors, defended the rights of the accused, banned in-school prayers, and instated ‘one man-one vote’ rule in voting districts. Warren’s dedication in desegregation showed how he succeeded in keeping all segregation cases unanimous. Warren, appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson, headed a panel known as the Warren Commission to investigate President Kennedy’s assassination. Furthermore, Warren, during his time in Court, nationalized the Bill of Rights to all states. Moreover, Warren and his Court in the landmark case of Griswold v. Connecticut, established and protected the right to privacy.

She was the only daughter out of four children. Her family was in the lower middle class, her father was a maintenance worker who suffered from a heart issues. This caused pricey medical bills that forced Elizabeth to work at such a young age, 13 years old, so she could help with her family's finances. Warren did not let finances get in the way of her studies; she was the state champion in debate and graduated high school at 16 years old. After this she received a full debate scholarship to George Washington University. After two years of schooling, Warren married her high school sweetheart, Jim Warren and moved to Texas. She attended University of Houston where she graduated with a degree in speech pathology. She was the first in her family to graduate college. She later attended Rutgers University where she earned her law

A resident of Phoenix, Ernesto Miranda was charged with rape, kidnapping and robbery. Before he was arrested he was not read his rights and after a two-hour interrogation he admitted to his crimes. Miranda had a history of mental instability and did not finish ninth grade did not have a lawyer present. His case was manly supported on his recorded confession. He was found guilty and was sentenced to twenty to thirty years in prison. When he appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court for unconstitutionally being convicted, he was denied. Then he took it up with the U.S. Supreme Court and they ruled that the court could not use his confession as evidence due to the police not reading him his rights. This case is important because by reading rights

During the 1950s to the 1960s, Warren took over the Supreme Court which become very unique. The debate about the Warrent court was that they were to focus on the judicial sphere rather than the democratic one(Driver, 2012). The Justices at that time created hope in people; they would transform constitutional law. The court alter rulings and it all begain with the case with Brown v. Board of

Burger was born in 1907 and his legal career started in 1931 after he graduated from St. Paul College of Law. The most important step in Burger’s life that would be most beneficial in leading him to his career as Chief Supreme Court Justice was becoming active in the Republican

We can see a significant of this case Miranda v. Arizona through a decision in Mapp v. Ohio. This was another controversial case that addressed the issue of the rights of criminals being given their advices may hamper their inviestagtions and result in more criminals being set free. By 1968, congress passed the laws that provided the courts abilities to examine confessions on a case by case basis. Then the courts would decide whetaer they would be allwed or disallowed. As a result of the Miranda v. Arizona case we can see the birth of what we now know today as the “Miranda

Ernesto Miranda was arrested after being identified in a police lineup and had been charged with kidnapping and raping a woman. While being integrated, Miranda was not informed of his 5th or sixth amendment rights, including self incrimination and the right to an attorney. After confessing to his crime, Ernesto was sentenced with up to 30 years in prison. However, Miranda’s defense attorney appealed his case to the supreme courts, claiming that since Ernesto was not read his rights or his attorney was not present during the interrogation, the confession should be excluded from the trial. Though Miranda’s appeal had been denied by Arizona, the U.S. court had then agreed to hear Miranda’s case. Even though it had been argued that Miranda knew

In 1954 the court wrote while under earl warrens direction that the separate educational was not equal and that segregation in Kansas had denied African Americans protection under the law