Introduction
The Eastern Republic of Uruguay is located in South America, in between Argentina and Brazil. On August 25, 1825, they received their independence from Brazil and became what it is to this day. Its population consists of about 3.3 million people in 2013. Their capital is Montevideo. They currently have a constitutional republic government, under the leadership of President José Mujica. The official language is Spanish, but their languages also include Portunol and Brazilero, a mix of Portuguese and Spanish. A majority of their ethnic group is white, with parts that are black and mestizo, a mix of Spanish and Native American. Uruguay is also one of the most peaceful and freest countries with the national motto being “Libertad o
…show more content…
The United Nations has given the territory of Rwanda-Burundi to Belgium, to help Rwanda-Burundi sustain self sufficiency. One of conflicts regarding the two different groups, the Hutus and Tutsis are the reason Rwanda-Burundi cannot govern itself. These two groups have political and ethnic tension over the issue of equality or superiority. Uruguay agrees with any means of resolving issues peacefully and all of the United Nations Trusteeship Council suggestions reasonable. The idea of sending troops to oversee the region is favorable to Uruguay. Uruguay frequently send troops on peacekeeping missions; they have constantly supported most missions. If the United Nations Trusteeship Council help the Belgian administration create guidelines to create a democracy, it will administer the progress for the rise of democracy without on overruling the other, creating equality. The country of Uruguay strongly believe in the equality and democracy. Overall, Uruguay believes that the issues can be efficiently resolved with the suggestions that the United Nations Trusteeship Councils …show more content…
The Hutus and Tutsis have ethnic issues; to achieve equality, progress between the two groups will have to be made. A peaceful provision would be to enforce the statement of allowing the two groups to have diplomatic talks and resolve the issues like the United Nations suggested. Uruguay has had the experience of two different parties fight and cause a war (The Great War), which eventually led to both signing a treaty that they both agreed to. The Treaty of Montevideo had different purposes, one being that Brazil and Argentina would have peace
When Belgium brought in colonialism they also brought in the Catholic Church. This irritated the Tutsi and they started to get agitated against Belgium authority. The Tutsi felt that Rwanda was just fine and there didn’t need to be anything changed. The negative response towards the new colonial economy and the Catholic Church that the Belgians brought in will end up coming back at the Tutsi. The Belgians saw this negative attitude and because of this attitude from the Tutsi the Belgians switched there support toward the Hutu. Since the Tutsi did not treat the Hutu with much respect in the past years the Hutu could take advantage of this support from the Belgians and payback the Tutsi’s for how they treated them in past years.
The Hutus are now in the position of power; the Hutu officials began to carry out massive genocides on the Tutsis. According to Document 8 it states, “The Hutu officials who took over the government organized the murders [of Tutsis] nationwide…Meanwhile, when the murders started the RPF [Tutsi-led Rwandan Patriotic Front] in Uganda invaded Rwanda again.” This quote demonstrates the back and forth genocide each ethnic group is imposing on each other. The genocide in Rwanda was sparked by the death of the Hutu Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, when his place was shot down. Many Hutus blamed the Rwandan Patriotic Front and instantly started campaigns of slaughter. This also provided additional reasons why the Hutu had hatred against the Tutsis. According to Document 9a it states, “Over the course of the genocide nearly one million people were killed.” This shows how extreme the genocide was and how extensive the genocide
Rwanda is a country located in Central Eastern Africa, with an extensive history of colonization, after Belgium attained control in 1924. Belgium’s rule however also marked the beginning of a lengthy ethnic rivalry between the Hutu and the Tutsi people. Belgium favored the Tutsi the minority at 14 percent of the population over the Hutu, the majority at 85 percent, simply because the Tutsis were more resembling of the Europeans. “Colonial policy helped to intensify bipolar differentiation between Tutsi and Hutu, by inscribing “ethnic” identification on identity cards, by relegating the vast majority of Hutu to particularly onerous forms of forced cultivation and corvee, and by actively favoring Tutsi in access to administrative posts, education, and jobs in the modern sector,” (Newbury, 12). Belgium’s control fueled the Hutu’s resentment towards the Tutsis because the Tutsis received superior treatment for decades. Thus, when Rwanda finally acquired independence in 1962, the Hutus fought for control over the government, highlighting the first warning sign of the genocide to come. Many Tutsis were killed afterwards, while many others fled to neighboring countries to escape the violence.
After the atrocities of the Rwandan Genocide and the lack on international intervention, Rwandan was forced to rebuild itself from scratch. Rwanda is a small country located in central Africa. Its population is divided between two ethnic groups: the hutus and the tutsis. The roots of the Rwandan genocide date back to 1924 when Belgium first took over Rwanda, formally a part of Tanzania. The Belgians viewed Tutsi superior to the hutus. Many referred to this as Hamitic hypothesis. It was motivated mainly by the fact that Tutsi were taller and thinner than hutus. This lead to a major boost in Tutsi egos and mistreatment of the Hutus for decades. This angered the Hutus leading to a major conflict between the two ethnic groups.
Rwanda has a long history that has contributed to their experiences of great violence and suffering and therefore the need for a peacekeeping. In pre-colonial times there was a division between the superior people being the Tutsi’ and the peasant people being the Hutu’s. King Ruganzu Ndori, being a Tutsi outlined Hutu’s area and showed no hesitation in treating any Hutu’s who opposed the order with unmitigated harshness.
According to the book Peacemaking in Rwanda, Hutus and Tutsis had prior hate towards one another due to “wealth, military prowess, family, and control over a precious commodity, or occupation of a prestigious social position.” (Jones, pg. 18) This meant at any time my children that Tutsis could become Hutus and Hutus could become Tutsis. Due to this my children, I come before to tell you never to hate your very own people. Clan lineage in Rwanda was were, power and status placed a role in the leading of the people as that determined who was a high authority amongst the different yet similar clans. While clan lineage played a role in who would lead the different clans, Rwanda before World War I was colonized by Germans. Sadly my kids, after World War I colonization moved on to the Belgium and this is was the day, when I saw my life flash before my eyes. The once peaceful Rwanda had changed within a day. When the Belgium came into power they “imposed on the contrary an intellectual and administrative simplification that equated “Tutsi’s” with “ruling class”.”(Jones, pg. 19) Throughout the Belgium ruling, Tutsis were the chosen ones to do all of the administrative work for the League of Nations Mandate. Due to this Belgium’s required for Tutsis to carry around cards that specifically showed and
Rwanda was taken over by the Belgians causing the Hutus and Tutsis to not get along which caused genocide. “Facing a revolution instigated by the Hutu, the Belgians let the Hutus, who constituted the majority of Rwanda 's population, be in charge of the new government. This upset the Tutsi. The animosity between the two groups continued for decades.” Both clans were upset and started Genocide in Rwanda. The causes of their mass casualties resolved in a never ending dispute between the two clans.
For years, Rwanda has been a hotbed of racial tension. The majority of the Rwandan population is made up of Hutu's, with Tutsi's making up the rest of it. Ever since European colonial powers entered the country and favoured the Tutsi ethnic group over the Hutu by putting Tutsi people in all important positions in society, there has been a decisive political divide between the two groups. This favouring of the Tutsi over the Hutu, and the Hutu subjugation as an ethnic lower class resulted in the civil war and revolution of 1959, where the Hutu overthrew the Tutsi dominated government, and resulted in Rwanda gaining their independence in 1962.
The Belgians also decreed that Tutsis should be the only ones in power and thus removed Hutus from positions of power and excluded them from higher education (Arraras). “By assuring the Tutsis’ monopoly of power the Belgians set the stage for future conflict in Rwanda” (Arraras). The Tutsis were enjoying their status as being superior to the Hutus but all that changed in 1959 with the Hutu revolution and so in 1960 and 1961 the Hutus won the elections. Since then, ethnic tensions had always been brewing between the Hutus and the Tutsis. However the tensions escalated when Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu, was shot down above Kigali airport on April 6, 1994. I consider this to be a form of political violence because someone or a group that opposed this President which represented only the political interests as well as the viability of the Hutus had to be killed in order for another group possibly the Tutsis to fill the vacuum of power left by the Hutu president. The Hutus blamed the assassination of their president on the Tutsis and in turn sparked an all out massacre waged on to the Tutsi people.
The peace treaty limited Habyarimana’s power. UN troops were stationed to attempt to make peace. This incited Hutu anger. While publicly agreeing to make peace, the internal affairs proved otherwise. Hutu extremists spread anti-Tutsi propaganda, and formed aggressive militias.
The aggressive behaviour that the belgians had was a legacy that they left behind and is shown through the story of the Hutus and the Tutsis. The Germans and Belgians thought more of the Tutsis only because they looked more European. This gave the Tutsis a higher position of power. But after World War II in 1962 Rwanda demanded for independance so the belgians gave them full power but no advisement. This began civil conflict between the Hutus and the Tutsis because they were both fighting for political power. Things became deadly when the Hutus formed a government and mant Tutsis ended up fleeing the country. There was a peace agreement signed in 1993 and it ended the fighting but not the hate between groups, so the fighting ended until the next year. When the president’s plane was shot down this rekindled the fighting because no one knew who it was, but the Hutus blamed the Tutsis. Thus began the Rwandan genocide within three months 800 000 to one million people died. All we did to help was sent a small amount of United Nations peacekeepers because the United Nations did not want to get involved with internal affairs, they would only deal with conflict between countries. The genocide eventually came to an end after a multi-ethnic government was established. After that approximately two million Hutus left out of fear that the Tutsis would get revenge. This
At the turn of the twentieth century, Rwanda was under German control. The Tutsi rulers had kept on dominating Rwanda up until and through this period of colonial rule. The social structure in Rwanda proceeded along these same lines even after World War I, when Belgium acquired Rwanda through the Treaty of Versailles. By the 1930's and 40's, the Hutu minority started growing restless. "rising Hutu patriotism" became a norm at this time. Fingers have been pointed at Belgium for escalating the situation by emphasising the gap between the Tutsi and Hutu people by giving preferential treatment to the Tutsis, making it possible for them to end up better taught and
The Uruguayans main language is Spanish. Uruguay is mostly christian, but the people there have the freedom to choose their religion. Some people honor Lenanya, or the goddess of the sea. The people here love music, folk music being their favorite. Uruguayans also enjoy arts and crafts, such as pottery and painting. In other words there are many different puzzle pieces in the culture of Uruguay.
Rwanda is a small country located in central Africa. It borders with Uganda, Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Tanzania. One of the most terrible “ethnic conflicts” occurred here in 1994, two tribes fought each other within the same territory, the rest of the world bizarrely ignored this event and thousands of people were killed. The event lasted 100 days and almost 1 million people died, even though the Rwanda government asked other countries for military
Prior to colonial era, Rwanda had larger population of Hutus compared to Tutsis and Twa. Rwanda as a country was divided into three ethnic groups i.e. Hutu (approximately about 85%), Tutsi (14%) and Twa (1%) (United Nations). Although, Tutsis were the minorities, they belonged to the higher strata compared to the other ethnic groups; Tutsis were privileged and had power and control over the Hutus and Twas. “Hutus were formerly bound to their Tutsi patrons via client ship” (Sinema, 2012). When Rwanda was colonized by Germany followed by Belgium, they favored Tutsis as they represented the upper class prior to the colonization. These created a social system like feudal system where there was a power difference between the Hutus and the Tutsis. Tutsis were considered as lord and the Hutus on the other hand, were considered as peasants. As a consequence, this created an ethic tension between the Hutus and the Tutsis and created a system more like apartheid. Nonetheless, they managed to co exist in Rwanda until they were decolonized. Although there is no social distinction between the Hutus and the Tutsis, the conflict between these tribes increased tremendously after the independence from Belgian that led to mass murder and ethnic cleansing of the Tutsi by the Hutu.