Economic Case Study on Spinning Mills

Compute the projected profit for the order quantities suggested by the management team under three scenarios: worst case in which sales = 10,000 units, most likely case in which sales = 20,000 units, and best case in which sales = 30,000 units.

The company recorded revenues of $25,003 million during the financial year ended January 2011, an increase of 6.4% over Fiscal Year 2010. The operating

In order to maximize the total profit, the monthly production plan should be 1900 unit/month for Model S and 650 unit/month

Total profit show a positive increase from 18% in 2013 to 31% in 2015, far reaching the brothers’ preference of $1.1 M in 2015, Appendix 3 showed $1.4 M net profit

Second, the manufacturing order costs for non-stocked items was calculated by dividing total manufacturing order costs for non-stocked items by the number of orders for non-stocked products. Non-stocked products have additional costs associated with processing orders that went above and beyond the costs associated with a stocked product. The third step involved determining what the S"A allocation factor would be for calculating the S"A volume related costs. This allocation factor would then be applied to manufacturing COGS. The fourth and final step involved the calculation of the operating profit based on backing out volume related costs from sales revenues followed by deducting S"A and manufacturing order costs from the resulting gross margin to arrive at a operating profit.

* We increased this costs as a percent of revenue 2.7% over the previous year for all forecasted periods

Given the use of each resource in the sales fulfillment cycle, determine the profitability of each customer.

The firm initially produces where MR=MC charging price P1 and quantity Qa. At this price the firm has a large amount of

Sales took the most percentage of total revenue. The revenue of sales increased gradually from $ 214,934 (in thousands) in 2010 to $ 260,832 in 2012 while the figure of royalties reduced gradually from $ 873 in 2010 to $ 681 in 2012 (in thousands). The revenue of other income increased from $ 1,286 to $ 1,325 during this period and then the figure decreased dramatically to $ 533 in the financial year 2012. In addition, in the financial year 2012, a new resource of revenue called membership was developed with the figure of $54.

Next we find the amount contributed from each Customer to the overall general and selling expenses based on the number of cartons ordered by each. The end result leads us to each customers overall profitability.

A result on the next page shows that at sales price of $21.50, the sales quantity rises to 1,140,085 units and net profit turns to positive for the first time. Besides, if a company continues to reduce the price further, at the point of $15.50, it is where the company’s profit on product 101 is in the highest position as it gives the net profit of $3,901,908.

In vertical analysis, it is easier to see elements as a percentage of Revenue. Between 2011-12, the portion that cost of sales takes in revenue has increased however, there is a bigger deterioration in distribution cost. In 2011, 9.21% of revenue remains as profit but in 2012 this figure decreases to 8.14%. Despite reduction in costs is one of the strategies of Ted Baker(part 1.4), analysis illustrates that costs increase each year.

There is no significant increase or deduction in terms of financial performance. There is a slightly downturn showing in the franchising sales revenue from 5.19bn to 5.08bn contributed by almost the same amount of outlets. Basic earnings per share have increased from 21.78c to 23.75c whilst a decrease of 2c in dividend per share compared with 2010.

This equation is solved for the sales volume in units. c. In the graphical approach, sales revenue and total expenses are graphed. The break-even point occurs at the intersection of the total revenue and total expense lines. 8-2 The term unit contribution margin refers to the contribution that

* By stock turnover ratio of the respective product; expenditure for fast selling products and slow selling products.