Economic Causes To The Civil War Essay

In 1861, a Civil War broke out in the United States when the South declared their independence from the Union. There is a great amount of reasons that people can argue how the Civil War was started. However, what most people don’t understand, is that most of the events leading up to the Civil War were related to slavery. Slavery was the core of the North and South’s conflict, which led to a very vicious feud.

Among the economies of the north and south arose many conflicts that led to the tension of the Civil War in 1861. In the 1800s, slavery was a major sectional issue. Northerners were strongly opposed to slavery unlike the south's belief that slavery was economically beneficial.

In short, the South was a polar opposite of the North. They were engrained with a greedy, stubborn and selfish

Between Constitutional ratification and southern secession, the United States increasingly developed sectional tensions between North and South. Regional differences and territorial expansion created the conflict of interests between the states. Proslavery southern and antislavery northern states envisioned their economical and political future in different ways. The question of slavery during the westward expansion was decisive for politics of both sides because more slave states would create voting advantages for the slaveholding states in the Congress. Northwestern territories were occupied by the new settlers from New England who established urbanized culture and infrastructure in Upstate New York and the Upper Northwest. New settlers in the Lower South organized farms and plantations to develop agricultural sector. Slavery was the main labor force in the South. With technological and transportation development, it became easier to migrate in the search of new territories. In the first half of the nineteenth century, the North supported industrialization and manufacturing, while the South was mostly focused on the agricultural development. The whole economy of the southern states depended largely on the cotton production. For many years, the issues of slavery, human rights and racial inequality were the main topics for discussion by people, and the expansion of borders in the beginning of the nineteenth century intensified discussions around these questions. The

The Civil War was caused by economic conflict, slavery issues and the disagreements between the North and South.

By the start of the Civil War, the North and the South had developed into two extremely different sections. There were opposing economic points of view, starting back into colonial periods, and it slowly drove the two regions farther in separate directions. Each one tried to force its point of view on the nation as a whole. Even though the Union was kept together for many years, in 1860 the condition was unstable. The different paths taken in the economic development of the North and South combined with the South’s slave based economy being threatened by the North contributed heavily to the development of the Civil War.

Sectionalism in America in the mid 1800s was as strong as ever. Different parts of the country though of themselves as separate, rather than one nation. With this, the different parts of the country also had different ways of life and beliefs. Some of these differences were their opinion on slavery, what jobs they had, and how they grew their towns and cities. Sectionalism in the northern, southern and western United States grew strong, causing America to become divided.

The Civil War, which lasted from 1861 to 1877, was mainly caused by the diverging society between the North and the South. The North and the South had different goals. There were many factors that led to the war and the chief ones were political and economic differences between the North and the South. The North’s aggression to control the South had led to the point where it was intolerable. The issue on slavery was one of the causes of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South’s economy. The slaves were needed to work on plantations which helped the South prospered. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery, which they thought was a disgrace to the Union.

Furthermore, both the North and the South needed labour; the North used poor white immigrants to fill factories while the South relied on slaves to farm cotton. Inevitably, these systems clashed as the Northern Republicans sought to limit the growth of Slavery to protect the jobs of their unskilled white constituents. In terms of microeconomics, Plantation owners would not benefit from having to pay waged laborers because the South required abundant and cheap slave labour to produce cotton in profitable amounts. Additionally, the cumulative value of slaves was too bloated to yield without a catastrophic loss of investments. Finally, the macroeconomic goals of the South included the expansion of slavery to the west, while the North was adamant about containing the already “shrinking south” to within its borders, forcing Slavery to extinguish as soil degraded and demand for farm labour fell. By controlling the West through free labour and the Homestead act, the North could deprive the South of critical plantations out

The division between the North and South states in the early American life was inevitable. The population in the Northern States were growing rapidly, while the population in the Southern States remained stagnant. The Northern economy was growing rapidly as well, as they were manufacturing goods that they wanted they to sell abroad, but more importantly, they wanted to sell these goods locally. The Southern States were a good market for these manufacturers. Their economy was rich from the sale of cotton, and they represented a prime, albeit small market. Northern manufacturers pressed for tariffs that imposed on imported foreign goods that could be made in the United States so they could ensure that the South bought the Northern goods. The Southern States, being predominantly agricultural, demanded there to be almost a status quo government, which would allow them to have more individual state rights, however, the Northern states relied on the government for help with their immigration and flourishing population. The two goals of the regions were

Of the seven deadly sins, the one that has plagued the United States the most throughout its history is greed.. Greed -- i.e., "the excessive desire to possess wealth or goods with the intention of keeping it for oneself." – can be seen in 1614, when Thomas Hunt sailed to Spain from his expedition in America with a ship packed with Patuxet Indians, bound to be sold into slavery. It can also be seen in 1773 as a major factor of the Boston Tea Party, where King George III was yearning for more control over colonial governments and hungry for the revenue from it. Greed can also be seen in 1830 during the Indian removal act, where President Andrew Jackson (backed by many other white Americans) signed a law that forced the five

In 1846, the Wilmot Proviso stated that out of the territory gained from the war with Northern Mexico, only Texas should be a slave state This ignited debate over expansion of slavery and what areas should and should not allow slavery. Within the next couple of years confrontations between

The cause of the civil war is debated and understood through multiple possible perspectives; social, political, economic, and religious. It is impossible to say that one factor or another had caused a certain chain of events, as all these factors interact with each other to various degree, and frequency. For the most part, the most common idea associated with the cause of the civil war would be to free the slaves, yet this idea is not entirely true. Yes, the civil war was fought over slavery, but not on whether slaves should be free or whether it is moral or not, but rather for the issues that slavery imposes when dealing with two contrasting economies that had developed in two different areas. The agrarian south had a socio-economic lifestyle based on slave labor, and the harvest of various crops, while the North had developed along the industrial revolution, forming modern transport through trains and canal, and diversifying in various economic ventures: banking, law, engineering, industrial agriculture, and transport. The difference in lifestyle would lead to an eventual debate when it came to the Missouri compromise of 1820 and again during western expansion;when slavery threatened white labor, and various economic policies were in favor of the North’s

In 1860, the world 's greatest nation was locked in Civil War. The war divided the country between the North and South. There were many factors that caused this war, but the main ones were the different interpretations of the Constitution by the North and South, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the arrival of

Dred Scot Case was where a slave from Missouri went to Wisconsin and got married.