Economics for business assignment
This is a two sided argument which needs complex and in-depth analysis to make a final judgement. The degree of government intervention may depend on many factors affecting the economy as a whole, a specific market and the businesses operating within it. The nature of different government regulations may have a restrictive nature, however some government action may have a beneficial effect on business activity and positively impact their objectives. It is essential to look at this argument from the businesses perspective to determine the government impact on their performance.
It could be argued that the business would be able to be more prosperous within the free market economy where the resources are allocated solely by the forces of supply and demand without any government regulations. Businesses could benefit from economic freedom and transparency, they will not be burdened by government regulations and bureaucracy. One of the main burdens of a regulated economy for businesses is the excessive bureaucracy resulting from over-regulation. Considering “Barack Obama 's health-care reform of 2010 which had many virtues, especially its attempt to make health insurance universal. But it does little to reduce the system 's staggering and growing complexity. Every hour spent treating a patient in America creates at least 30 minutes of paperwork, and often a whole hour.” (http://www.economist.com/node/21547789 , 8/11)
This suggests how
The economy of Brazil is in the top ten largest economies along with the United States. It is the biggest in Latin America. Actually it is the seventh largest in the world. Brazil has used its newly found economic mechanism to syndicate its outcome in South America and show more of a role in the Global Businesses. The Obama Administration’s National Security Strategy recognizes Brazil as a developing center of effect, and greets the management of the country’s joint and global issues. The United States and Brazil associations mostly have been good in the recent years. But Brazil has other strengthening relations with neighboring countries and expanding ties with nontraditional partners in the South that’s developing.
-Mohair farmers have earned a subsidy from the federal government for decades because the mohair farmers can get large payments from the government without taxpayers ever really noticing because the farmers who get the subsidy care a lot about it, while the rest of us taxpayers (paying mere pennies extra in taxes) do not really care. And, “any politician with a preference for job security can calculate that a vote for the mohair subsidy will earn the strong support of the mohair farmers while costing nothing among other voters” (Wheelan 177).
Apple Incorporation is one of the biggest high technology company that operates worldwide. Is was established on April 1, 1976 in California by Steve Wozniak, Steve Jobs and Ronald Wayne.The company is known for designing and manufacturing several technology devices include Smart Phones (iPhone), Tablets, iPods, iPads, Mac, Apple TV, Apple watches as known as smart watches, it also produce software’s like the OS X and iOS operating systems, and offers several online services such as iCloud, Apple Pay, Apple Care. The company strategy is to designee and enhances its own operating systems, software, hardware and other services by providing customers with new developed technology.
Regulating a variety of aspects of business and society is an old and often controversial aspect of government, particularly at the national level. Much of what the national government does, or fails to do, has an impact on individual citizens, private corporations and other business enterprises, agricultural producers and marketers, foreign governments, labor unions, and state and local governments.
Though the regulations on big businesses had a positive effect on the United states, it seems as if there are not enough. Within large corporations that are ran not completely, but partially by the government, there was a huge gap created that separated the rich and the poor. In the 19th century, during the Industrial Revolution, the structure of the United States economy was transformed. Rapid advancements in technology were made, causing factory owners to gain wealth and prestige. These advancements had a negative effect on the poor because it did not fit their daily spendings or budgets. There are two different regulations set towards big businesses, which are state regulation and federal regulation. A state regulation does not include regulations issued by executive branch agencies, decisions of federal courts,
The United States government has passed 81,883 rules over a nine year span according to audiotech.com. All the regulation passed the last nine years cost the average business owner with about twenty employees over 212,000 dollars extra per year. In total American business owners had to pay over $1.75 trillion to comply with government regulation. The involvement of government in business operations is becoming counteractive. It should be up to the business owner on how he would like to promote his business because it’s his investment that is being but at risk. The government has increasingly been interfering and passing laws on how businesses should operate, from smoking bans, medical coverage too how a business can hire or fire people. The government shouldn’t be so involved on how business operate to include the processes of hiring and firing employees.
1. Suppose that there are two states that do not trade: Iowa and Nebraska. Each state produces the same two goods: corn and wheat. For Iowa the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of wheat is 3 bushels of corn. For Nebraska the opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of corn is 3 bushels of wheat. Present production is:
However, what many fail to realize is that some form of government regulation within a free-market economy, such as in America, is vital to its flourishment. Personally, I am in support of a free-market economy, but to an extent. The article, Faith in an Unregulated Free Market? Don’t Fall for it, stresses the importance of the presence of moderate government regulation. Without any form of regulation, “an unregulated competitive economy will inevitably spawn an immense amount of manipulation and deception” (Shiller NYT). The example is given that it is like when grocery stores put candy bars at the checkout counter; they know whining children will often force parents to make the additional purchase, providing the store with a way to draw in additional revenue. Amazingly, checkout-line items alone can draw in up to 17% additional profit for a business. With this in mind, it is the aims of the author to make his audience aware that without any regulation, “harmless” manipulation such as this may be exacerbated to a greater level. This could result in privately owned businesses charging their customers higher prices that people will have to pay because there are no governmental laws preventing them from doing so. I too believe that some form of regulation is necessary to prevent externalities like these from occurring in a free-economy. Without rules, the people within the economy
minh co 2 bai Quiz 4 day. Quiz 3 thi de minh tim da nhe, hinh nhu khong luu thi phai.
Another advantage with the removal of government interference from the economy is a reduction in the start up costs of new corporations along with a reduction in taxation, since less requirements and regulations are now in place. With business no longer having to conform and abide by strict regulations, this allows more innovators to enter and profit in the marketplace with their ideas. These inventors will create jobs for their new business and products even reducing unemployment. Free market economies offer the highest incentive to be the next Bill Gates or Steve Jobs since one is able to succeed and profit solely based off their own product or idea, making this the most efficient economy possible. With more entrepreneurs able to enter the market, there will also be a rise in competition, or business competing for customers to buy similar
I agree that the free market would run into serious problems undercutting its sustainability without regulation; however, the free market is as much a creation of the state that is highly influenced by interest groups. Interest groups play an important role in the formation of a regulation. Interest groups help candidates get elected into government. In return, interest groups can lobby for leniencies in policies that serve their interests. For example, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers has lobbied the government of pipeline regulation, streaming of Fisheries Act, tax credits, and greenhouse gas regulations (as per Macleans.ca, The 10 lobby groups with most contact). If these private interests didn’t exist, would the general public lobby to increase tax credits to corporations? I don’t believe this is the case.
Government should not be run like a business because a system that was established to protect and ensure the public good should always put equity before efficiency. Government is inherently different from business, and therefore should run differently.
The current economy has hurt many retail businesses. Every month another retail giant closes its doors. Retail stores which we never would have imagined have gone bankrupt. Retail sales have declined greatly. Major cause of this declination is because many people are unemployed and cannot afford to purchase anything. Retailers are forced to discount prices to increase sales, but discounting still hurts margins. Retailers are assuming a very
Generally, the dominant role of government in business, as many would agree, is to provide an enabling environment for economic activities that improve commerce. According to The Marketing Education Research Center (2009), this is achieved through the protection of business property, enforcement of contracts, settling business disputes, and encouraging entrepreneurship. The 21st century, with regard to globalization and
The government’s influence over the economy through regulation should stem from decision making that is properly vetted through different sequences. The government needs to be aware of situations that