Education Is The Root Of The Problem

For my journal entry I choose to read Online Higher Education’s Individualist Fallacy by Johann N. Neem. Johann Neem is a professor of history at Western Washington University and argues that there is a value in “Institutional culture” for the student that attends traditional classes on a college campus. According to Neem, institutional culture is important because learning is a social experience and depends on relationships since under the guidance of a professor a student will prosper, and be inspired by the energy in the classroom setting. Neem also states that professors are able to adapt easily to the needs of the students that are present in the classroom versus those who attend online. Neem, contends that distance learning undercuts institutional learning due to the fact that students are not fully engaged with their professors and can miss out

Malcolm X once said “education is the passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today”. From adolescence to adulthood almost every person is put through schooling. As one gets older in age, the education they obtain becomes more rigorous in order to stretch their minds far beyond two plus two or what color the sky is. The strategies of critically thinking and being able to analyze/decipher information in front is them is reinforced routinely in the educational system. With this being said, the purpose of education is to aid in enhancing one’s qualification, socialisation, and subjectification skills within the society regardless of how or where one’s education was obtained.

The system of higher education in America could be in trouble. Due to dramatic change in what society values, they could soon be under attack. In the two articles that I analyzed, these issues were discussed in further detail. The first article was titled, “The Future of College” and was written by Graeme Wood. Its purpose was to draw attention to a new approach at education. The second article, “The Troubled Future of Colleges and Universities”, written by Gary King and Maya Sen, focused on the obstacles that universities are facing and gave suggestions of ways to overcome them. Along with this, both articles, addressed what education may look like in the future. With the development of technology and information from new studies, many wonder what the outcome could be. Will lecture style classes remain? Could higher education convert to a completely online experience? What is the most effective teaching method? In the first article, Wood argues for a completely online education. Whereas, the other article believes that universities need to focus on the importance of research. However, students learn in different ways, therefore, today’s higher education institutes should offer a variety of instructional methods.

Some people might like education, others might dread it and really don’t see a reason to continue learning about it. Today, for teachers and professors it’s easy to them to tell how the education they teach is effective for an individual student. As we know, education is being taught at school, home, and a little of both. For America today, most children attend preschool, kindergarten, elementary, middle school, high school, and college. Depending on the pupil's career choice, it can take up to 20 or more years completing their schooling system, Usually, during the middle and or high school years in America, professors teach you valid things pupils will be using in life.

Currently the U.S. has a major problem on its hands, education today is constantly losing money while we put more of that money and time into our prisons rather than our schools. By showing kids that it is more important to be tough on crime than it is for a proper education is wrong. If these practices continue you can expect to see higher drop-out rates and larger prison populations. Education should be the U.S.’s top priority and we should take pride in the greatest education system in the world. Education provides students not with just knowledge but ethics, character development and self-esteem which are important skills for the workplace and in life. That is why it is

Education is not only for classroom purposes but it extends into the workforce because it is important to make a living. Education should help us appreciate life more by giving us the power to do things and have personal fulfillment. Developing a good education involves problem-solving, creativity, curiosity and criticism. I have learned that it is

The goals of education are controversial and not many people can agree on what they are. A commonly shared opinion of the “purpose of education is to prepare students for the “real world” to “succeed””. Children are constantly being prepared for the workforce and what will

One shouldn’t claim themselves as educated based off their grades, what type of school they attend, or simply just the accumulated knowledge they obtain. Being educated involves the characteristics one obtains and how one uses those characteristics in the real world. One definite, exemplary aspect of education is one’s ability to think critically. To think critically, one must make reasoned judgements that are logical and well thought out. If one is a critical thinker, they will contemplate the reasons for and against doing something before making impulse decisions. By doing this, one makes decisions based on fair assessment, not the basis of their emotions and immediate thought. By exercising this in one’s everyday life, it shows more education

School should teach much more, so when the students graduate, they will be familiar with what is coming next. Also, in “The Purpose of Education” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., he describes how “education must enable a man to become more efficient, to achieve with increasing legitimate goals in his life” (Citation). Dr. King asserts his position by ethically providing the capabilities of what a man should be able to do from education. This strategy helps the audience understand the definition of “true education”. With his informative and personal tone, he explains

The educational system has continuously transformed over the decades, from Elementary and Secondary Education Act to the Common Core National Standards. There has been a quite a few controversies as to the Common Core. In the article, The Fatal Flaw of Educational Assessment is debated.

There are several scholars in various institutions who are deeply concerned with how education is being delivered in American institutions. As a matter of fact, they consider that the American system of education is broken -even dead. In particular, Tony Wagner last January 2015 released a documentary titled Most Likely to Succeed, in which he explores the question how to better prepare students for the 21 century. He radically asserts that the school’s role of transmitting academic knowledge is obsolete and that in today’s world skills, disposition and motivation matters more than knowledge (Wagner, 2015). Although this might be true, knowledge, skills, and embodied learning experience are not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, when knowledge is combined with a learning experience that is fully integrated, its power is profoundly transformative. On the other hand, Sir Ken Robinson in his speech at The RSA in How to Change Education describes the relevance of changing education from the ground up. He proposes going back to basics, not on the matter of subjects, but to redefining its purpose and revitalizing the connection between educators and students. I believe students are demanding a different approach to education, they feel something is missing and, alas, they are looking for it outside College’s campuses. Pew’s statistics state that students when asked to how do they prepare themselves for the labor force, half of all college graduates say gaining more

Perusing higher education can be done for a few reasons; either wanting to obtain a professional degree for a job or a liberal arts degree for a set interest. Either way, higher education has become a mandatory thing in many peoples lives. Ronald Barnett and Martha Nussbaum both have similar views on education. Barnett believes that there will always be more to learn and a proper education should make you realize that there is always more to learn. Nussbaum’s approach to the situation states that the way the United State’s education system is built, students are almost forced into caring about learning the humanities and such. I believe that higher education is something that can be used to teach students how to act and react when pushed

A college education is a passport for a good future and learning leads to more opportunities to improve as a person. Students often ask themselves why attend college and why pay a lot money just for a piece of paper that says, “Congratulations for the achievement.” According to Jullien Gordon, a TEDtalk speaker, “for every minute in college, students are paying one dollar.” If Gordon is right teachers should teach students skill that they cannot learn on their own. Sometimes people need to stop asking and complaining about the four years in college and ask themselves “how I can improve my life?” The purpose of college is to discover a person’s value.

Education can be defined as a learning process in which a student and a teacher are involved. The work of the teacher is to pass on the message to the student while the student understands and applies what has been taught. It is also considered as a process of developing skills, knowledge and character of an individual. Education, whether formal or informal, has a function both to the individual and the society, these functions are either manifest or latent. There is a distinction between the manifest and latent functions in that the manifest functions are those that are intended whereas the latter are the unintended functions (Douglas, 2003).

* Workshops must be arranged for the teachers so that they learn how to teach their students and teachers, professors should be consulted while making any plan, syllabus or