Educational Setting Parents Have Rights

In an educational environment portrayed by an immense weight on accountability, our nation has been occupied outlining its educational goals to allow us to take part in a global economy. Even in this situation, the notion of family and parent participation in school takes precedence. There are two substantial examples of this. First, in 1994, Congress constituted the Goals 2000: Educate America Act. In composition with Goal Flight, "By the year 2000, every school will promote partnerships that will increase parent involvement and participation in promoting the social, emotional, and academic growth of children" (Sec. 102, 8, A). Some of the aspirations of this goal encompassed the installation of programs to increase parent involvement, encouraging parents in the support of academic excellence of children at home, and shared decision making at school. Second, parents are referred to a few hundred times in various parts of the No Child Left Behind Act (2002), specifically in Section 1118, Title 1. This section of the Act is written explicitly for parent involvement. “More specifically, this section requires that school districts and schools receiving Title I dollars must have a written parent involvement policy and build school capacity to effectively

Parental involvement in a child’s education can be detrimental to the teaching process in more ways that someone might realize. The article by Ron Clark, “What teachers really want to tell parents” outlined the problems that can arise in the way parents perceive their child’s teacher, on the other end of the spectrum than the most commonly known problem, which is when parental involvement is lacking, it can cause a direct relation to inhibiting their child’s ability to learn, and do well in school. Clark discusses the problems that arise when a parent doesn’t appreciate the teacher’s involvement in their child’s life. He first acknowledges the fact that new teachers are only making it 4.5 years into the profession, which some of the reasons

An effective communication between parents and child is vital: it helps the child to feel safe et secure, it helps the child in his/her social and affective

This assignment will seek to help you answer this and other questions regarding the rights of LEP students and their families. As the number of LEP students grows and language diversity increases, districts around the country have tried to implement effective academic approaches to meet the needs of students who lack the English language skills necessary to succeed in English-only classrooms. Often, attempts to provide services are surrounded by controversy,prompting us to ask: What services, if any, are school districts required to provide for LEP students?Please provide short answers to the following questions regarding LEP Policies

Children have the right to education, food, and have the ability to live. They have the right to be heard, and to tell when one hurts them. All children should be treated equally, no matter their age, religion, culture, gender, wealth, or color.

On the other hand, there are some parents that need to be stripped of their rights however children should not be extended to such a great latitude of freedom that parents or other adults instruction is no longer considered warranted. According to Harris-Short and Miles (2011) “The interventionist philosophy expressed the belief that parents knows what is best for their children, it seeks to protect the privacy of the family unit and the fundamental right of a child’s parent to raise their children in accordance with their own beliefs and values, free from state scrutiny and control (p. 522) Menchini (2011) contributed that “children are given only one opportunity to personal development: if this is lost, the consequences could last their entire

Immigration population continues to expand therefore, increasing the number of students who are not proficient in English and requiring protection under the law. “Approximately 5 million students in the United States schools have limited English language skills that affect their ability to participate successfully in education programs and achieve high academic standards” (Contreras, 2011). Having both federal and state mandates allows equal protection under the law for English Language Learners (ELL). ELL’s presented many legal concerns and violation of rights that were protected by the Constitution as they entered the school system. Students were segregated from non-ELL’s. Students were not given supplemental materials for instruction.

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) talked about the Free Exercise Clause by putting together a three-part explanation to balance out people 's education and religious freedom. “The balancing test marked the move from belief-action doctrine in the nineteenth century.”(Politics, 2014) Through the case its decisions impacted the debate regarding parents control of their children 's education. Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment posed some challenges to court, which was faced with the conflicts between the church and the state. “The clause, which protects the free exercise of religion, fails to define religion, leaves its protective parameters unclear, and invites a wide range of interpretations.” (Industries, 2016) Free Exercise is difficult to understand but it is important in a nation as diverse as the United States. In the United States religious groups look for exemption from state or federal laws based on their own beliefs.

All children also have rights, no matter who they are, or where they live, who their parents are, or what language they speak, no matter what their race or religion is, no matter whether they are male or female, what their type of culture is, if they have a disability, or are able bodied or whether they are rich or poor. No child should ever be treated differently or treated unfairly by anyone under any circumstances.

During the interview, the interviewee stated, “as far as a teacher is concerned, really, it’s all about communication (A. Redman, personal communication, August 28, 2015)”. This suggests that communication is an incredibly vital component in her profession. She stated what she has to do to communicate with students, her colleagues, and parents in a professional manner. In addition, the interviewee agreed that she has to talk to different types of people in different ways. This was proven when she quoted, “to begin with, it’s communication in the classroom at all levels of ability of students so that you need to be able to re-explain things in a different way for the person who didn’t understand the way you explained it the first time (A. Redman, personal communication, August 28,

In any education system on the globe, every child should be afforded an equal chance to succeed and fulfil his/her potential to the fullest. This should be guaranteed to all children regardless of their age, sex, race, religion, cultural practices and beliefs, nationality or class.

Every child has the right to access the curriculum, Equality of access. This means that children can work to the best of their ability and be treated equally within their learning. The schools have a duty to support these rights and they must be reflected through their policies and procedures and must comply with current legislations and codes of practice. The Equality Act 2010

Teachers have an obligation to give children various opportunities to make their voices heard. According to Grindheim et al. (2010 p.83) the teacher is the key person and transforms everyday experiences into important co-operation moments and communication.

Students are people. Their voices are usually is not as mighty as that of an adult, and so it is the teacher’s duty to be that child’s advocate and fight on his behalf. Once a teacher is aware of the challenges that a student is facing in her classroom, it is up to her to put the wheels in motion and make sure that the child is set up for success. At times, this may include being an advocate for the parent as they are not always aware of what can and needs to be done for their child. It is a scary situation for many parents who are learning for the first time that their student is exceptional.

Education is the most effective tool and medium for human development. Right to education has been judicially construed to fall within the guarantee of right to life in Article 21 and