Essay Educational Theory of Teaching Writing

In his book, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Brazilian educator, philosopher, and author, Paulo Freire, informs us, the readers, of the difference between an oppressive education system and a libertarian system. Freire first published this book in Portuguese in 1968, just four years after his imprisonment and exile on the charge of spreading revolutionist teachings. He uses verbose language to further emphasize the importance of learning and a passionate tone to show his anguish at the loss of knowledge and education. In his lament for the awakening of his people, Freire’s effective use of the rhetorical situation persuades his audience to reject their country’s current oppressive system and to fight their oppressors who refuse them the right of free thought.

99% of you will be using the same sources of information so the overall structure

Writing a paper on the writing process is pretty hard. The writing process is different from one person to another. You come across questions like, 'What exactly is the writing process?'; and 'Must you follow one persons writing process if yours is different?'; This is where I came across the answer to my questions, write however you wish to write. If one person likes free write first and another person likes to write a draft first, let them do how they please.

Paulo Freire introduces the idea of a “problem-posing” education system in his book The Pedagogy of the Oppressed, which offers a highly effective alternative to the traditional method of memorizing facts that he deems the “banking” concept of education. Problem posing allows individuals to expand their own thoughts, ideas, and opinions through open discussion in a classroom setting. I went through such an experience senior year in my Comparative Government class, which focused on different governments along with the key social and economic issues they face. While many may argue that the “banking” concept has some value in certain issues, the alternative in problem-posing offers a broader experience in which

In chapter 1 Paulo Friere expresses the need for restoring the humanity in both oppressed and oppressor. In most societies, the oppressor usually the leaders control everyone under them. Hence need for freedom among the oppressed. Therefore the pedagogy tries to explain to masses their own actions through which they understand the problems. This would only be achieved by including these in the education system.

Writing is something I don't really enjoy doing. Transferring my thoughts to paper as clearly as possible is difficult for me. In the past, the goal of my previous teachers was to make sure I knew how to write but didn’t make sure I knew how to write well. My meaning of writing well would be using correct grammar, fluency and a clear understanding. I believe if you have to question what someone wrote then it wasn’t written very well. The question is who am I to judge another’s writing?

Berger (1974) raises his criticism in his understanding that Freire has developed a pedagogy, in which the oppressed needs the oppressor to be conscious of their situation; however, he ignores the implication of the dehumanizing living conditions, which constitute the oppressed’s context, and that impedes them from being consciously aware of their actual situation. Although this criticism lacks a deeper acknowledgement of the historical and sociocultural context in which Freire developed most of his work, it is important to take into consideration the influence of political thought within a culture circle and how risky is to support literacy practices only from the perspective of the culture circle coordinator.

When thinking about this, however, I begin to wonder what kind of world could exist outside of this oppression. I have always thought I can overcome and see pass educational curriculums and systems but now that I internalized Freire's “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”, I question just like him what is “authentic existence”? But I can appreciate and continue my journey in my college HED 120 class where I am in a comfortable learning space that will encourage me to participate more in class because I know voicing my opinion is important. I will remember that Freire writes “problem posing education bases itself on creativity and stimulates true reflection and action upon reality, thereby responding to the vocation of persons as beings who are authentic only when engaged in inquiry and creative transformation” when I am teaching others. Steve Biko once said “The most powerful weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed” but we will grow in our educational systems, our communities and environments. It just takes

Paolo Freire’s essay Pedagogy of the Oppressed and Richard Wright’s “The Library Card” both center around the idea of education. In Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Freire elaborates on the contradictory student-teacher relationship in the “banking” concept of education and the need for consciousness and communication within the educational system. He suggests students and teachers should engage in a more active dialogue in which both parties are learning from each other. In this way, the students gain consciousness of themselves not only as intellectual beings, but also as beings who contain valuable and vital knowledge to provide to the teacher. Similarly, in “The Library Card,” Wright becomes conscious of his humanity after reading books and

When I first entered this class, I did not have a clue as to what inquiry was nor did I know how to write an inquiry paper. I had always written argumentative essays. It was either this or that, not why could this be an option? Or why did the author choose to use this example to express his opinion? I will be honest, I still do not completely understand inquiry. I understand the concept of it, but I do not understand everything about it. I understand that it is used to explore the different possibilities of a viewpoint, idea, or tone of a paper but, why is it? I understand that inquiry is meant to be used to gain a deeper meaning of the ideas or concepts presented by the author. It is meant to be used to ask questions that get further in depth than a simple yes or no. Inquiry is meant to use evidence to back up the answer provided. Inquiry helped me progress in the writing world as it allowed me to further explore different writing styles.

One of the people with the biggest influences on my personal education philosophy is Paulo Freire. The major theme throughout his book, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, is how important it is for people to dialogue with one another (Freire, 1970). Dialogue, to Paulo Freire (1970), means acknowledging that both parties are human beings with equally valid life experiences, and both of whom are worthy of love and respect. His theory is not only a philosophy, but an action plan. I believe that he is right about how bad the 'Banking Model of Education' is for students (Freire, 1970). Instead of viewing students as empty vessels to be filled (Freire, 1970), I believe I should be encouraging their own interests. By learning from Freire's

1. David’s primary purpose in sending a message is to inform the reader that the car company will not honour the customer’s claim. The writer’s priority is to inform the reader that the company would like to honour the claim, but point out that it could not happen because the warranty is expired.

As society continues to evolve people maintain their quest to accept full humanity, in this process individuals question not only who their authentic self is, but what is keeping them from accepting that version of themselves. A question which Freire addresses in his Pedagogy of the Oppressed as he emphasizes how liberation transcends time, and atmosphere. Instead he chooses to illustrate a process which is embodied by acceptance of the oppressor, activism, fellowship, solidarity, and reflection, it is these components that create the means for a successful path to liberation, while simultaneously allowing for the identification of personal and societal growth (Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed). Brooks, Collins, and Kidd’s novels

Essay writing and report writing is quite much similar that many of people get confused in the difference between essay writing and report writing. Inspite of having some similarities, they both are written insignificantly different styles. Essay writing and report writing should be written in a formal academic style with checking of grammar,presentations and spelling . There are some similar things in essay writing and report writing because both start with an introduction, body with discussions and examine and then conclusions and both are established in inspective thinking. But essay writing and report writing,have some dissimilarity So writers should think about before planning a writing.

I believe that achieving success in teaching very different aspects of life may still combine similar processes. My life in high school was very similar to the lives of many other students in that it revolved around two things: sports and school. My sport of choice was tennis and my favorite academic area was English. Unexpectedly, I found many similarities led to a successful performance in both areas. My understanding of the need for a good program to follow and a lot of practice with it led to success in both tennis and my academic performance (especially English). Upon becoming a recognized player in my area, I decided to take the skill that I knew better than any other and utilize it as a