Edward R. Murrow Analysis

Having served nearly thirty years at CBS News, Mr. Goldberg had earned a reputation as one of the most original writers and thinkers in broadcast journalism. However, when he observed his own industry, he realized the liberal media had completely missed their mission to give honest news. After years of sharing his observations and promoting more balanced reportings, Goldberg soon realized that no one listened because they believed they were doing the right thing. The liberal bias continued, therefore Bernard Goldberg decided to take the situation into his own hands and expose the distortion of the media himself. Goldberg’s breathtaking and shocking best seller book, Bias, reveals the close-mindedness of the news culture and their mission to entertain rather than share facts.

I found that Mr. Murrow had three utmost important topics that were very endearing and focused mostly on them with total honesty, and those were in relation to Senators, Communism and Nazis. Edward Murrow followed up on those things listed throughout his entire career in journalism and media

This essay will discuss to what degree the media can be blamed for the United States’ loss in the Vietnam conflict ending 1975. It will be based predominantly on key written resources on the subject, but it will also contain - by means of an interview - certain first-hand observations from a Vietnam War veteran.

The main character of the film is Edward R. Murrow, the elegant and severe face of CBS News See it Now. Costumed in sharp suits and stylish patterned ties with glossy slicked back hair, the noir filter exhibits him as an imposing ostentatious figure, flamboyantly smoking a cigarette between his fixed positioned fingers. His voice is a perfect imitation of the real Murrow’s hardened scowl with dry drone-like delivery, expelling gravitas, courage and confidence as he devotes himself to report the truth in the face of McCarthy’s corruption. This nostalgic view of Murrow steals the attention of viewers from his era, especially when reciting his famous monologues on air revealing McCarthy for what he is doing. McCarthy however, is only displayed through existing historic footage of him. This is accompanied by his gravelly and rather grating, monotonous voice, of which becomes repetitive and intrusive as the news team periodically look through footage of his speeches to use against him. This contrast of characterisation between Murrow and McCarthy clearly shows that they are respectively good and evil counterparts of one another.

As I sat in my apartment and waited for my guest I opened up my laptop to skim my notes. Edward R. Murrow, radio broadcast legend and American hero. This man survived London during World War II and now he’s coming over to my house for an interview. So many thoughts circled my head while I waited. What questions will I ask? How will he answer? Will I be able to use this interview at all? I kept frantically flipping through my notes when I heard a knock at the door.

There were several muckrakers at this time, one of them was Jacob Riis. He was a Danish-American social reformer, “muckraking’ journalist and social documentary photographer. He was known as the reknown muckraker, there was also Ida Tarbell, and Upton Sinclair. These 3 muckrakers were known to be the top ones, that changed the most. They changed public policy with their investigative reporting style. This style helped them expose political corruption and public issues like job conditions and poverty to the masses via popular magazines.

Nobody could have known that on September 20th, 1878 in Baltimore, a man who would eventually revolutionize the media and bring the term muckraking to the forefront of cultural perception would be born. At the time, America was still

By 1968, more than half of the American people relied on television as their principal source of news. What they saw informed, engrossed, and unsettled them. CBS Evening News anchor Harry Reasoner referred to it as “horrors and failures.” The Vietnam War dominated the network newscast as it never had before. Suddenly the war was everywhere. The impact on the American public would indeed be great. It set off a critical reaction to the war within the American media and gave greater credence to arguments against the war that a vocal protest movement had been voicing for some time. The media coverage of the Tet Offensive had a great influence on the eventual outcome of the fighting and its aftermath. Clarence Wyatt, author of Paper

Teddy Roosevelt used the term “muckraker” as an insult for journalist who went too far with their stories. Jessica Mitford believed that she earned the title, and was honored by it. As long as a journalist story was made up of factual information, there was no harm done in the pursuit of their stories. Mitford deserved the praise of being called a “muckraker” because it helped to expose the harsh elements of the early 1900s in order to get the government’s attention to make the appropriate changes.

During the days of early television broadcast Edward R. Murrow, the main reporter in Goodnight and Goodluck, opposes Senator Joseph McCarthy during his crusade to eliminate communists that supposedly infiltrated the government. During these times

Throughout this investigation, many types of sources were used. Primary source recordings to books written by historians alike point to the same conclusion: Murrow’s famous broadcast planted seeds of dissent in public opinion and marked the beginning of the end for McCarthy’s political career. Every source used for this investigation supports this conclusion, which indicates that further research should be done. This investigation is lacking in sources demonstrating that Murrow was unimportant in McCarthy’s political career. In this way, this investigation is biased in support of Murrow.

The investigation assesses the media coverage of the Tet Offensive and its impact on American policy concerning the Vietnam War from 1968 until 1969. The investigation evaluates the contrast between media broadcasts and government reports of the war, the effect of the media on the American public, and the effect of American public opinion on President Lyndon B. Johnson’s course of action. Two of the sources, Vietnam and America: A Documented History by Marvin E. Gettleman, Jane Franklin, Marilyn Young, and H. Bruce Franklin, and The “Uncensored War”: The Media and Vietnam by Daniel C. Hallin are examined.

Edward R. Murrow was born on April 25, 1908, in Polecat Creek, North Carolina. He went to Washington State University and studied political science, speech, and international relations (Edward R. Murrow Biography). He began news broadcasts in 1928 and continued throughout World War 2 (Edward R. Biography). He graduated Washington State University in 1930, and went on to work for the International Institute of Education. He married Janet Huntington Brewster in 1935, five years after graduating university. (Edward R. Murrow Timeline). Murrow later then left broadcasting in 1961 and died on April 27, 1965 in New York.

This signature line soon became the opening of many different radio broadcasts and for many different CBS radio channels over the world, such as Europe. Murrow was also famous for his line “Good night and good luck” at the end of every radio report he gave. Murrow was named famous and celebrity-like for his ability to give such great war reports. Murrow returned to the United States again in 1941. A dinner was held in his honor and Franklin D. Roosevelt sent him a welcome back telegram which was read at the dinner. He was mostly recognized by a speech from the Librarian of Congress for his power and intimacy of wartime dispatches. Only a week after this speech the attack on Pearl Harbor occurred. Murrow brought in several different combat missions to give additional reports to later broadcast. Murrow learned skills while majoring in Speech in college on how to improvise vivid descriptions and was able to broadcast a well descripted announcement of what was going on. Murrow so closely worked with the British and was offered a job by Winston Churchill to be in charge of programming. This job was declined by Murrow but led him to meet Churchill’s daughter in law, Pamela. Edward Murrow married back in 1935, Janet Brewster and had their first son, Charles Casey Murrow. Pamela wanted to get married to Murrow and he considered it but ended the affair when his wife had their son Charles in

What was astonishing was not the rapidity of the news- that is, after all, the beauty of modern broadcasting technology- but the effect that the news had on the public. In the following weeks and months, story after story demonstrated the