Edwin Roger: Alcoholic Beverage

The Guidelines provide for a base offense level of 30 for this offense, pursuant to U.S.S.G§§ 2D1.1(a)(5)(c)(4). Taking into account Mr. Rivera Lemus’s acceptance of responsibility, the total offense level is decreased to 27, pursuant to U.S.S.G§§ 3E1.1(a)-(b). Mr. Rivera Lemus’s prior criminal record includes three driving related offenses; driving while impaired and driving on a revoked license; which elevates his Criminal History Category from I to III.

Teagle 170 P.3d 266 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007), defendant Teagle was pulled over after being observed speeding down the highway. When the officer approached the vehicle, he noticed two cellular phones on the dashboard, an open container of liquor, fast-food wrappers, a box of cookies, a map, and luggage and clothing in the backseat. The officer gave the defendant a warning and then asked him if there was any contraband in the vehicle or whether there was a chance anyone else could have placed any contraband in the vehicle. Although the defendant answered in the negative, the officer returned to his patrol vehicle and asked if there was a canine unit available. There was not and so the officer told the defendant that he was free to leave. Shortly afterwards, the officer saw the defendant speeding once again down the road. The officer proceeded to pull him over and gave him another warning. The officer again asked him if he could search the vehicle and the defendant answered in the affirmative. The officer called a canine unit which arrived an hour later. The canine, in proceeding to do an exterior sniff, circled around to the trunk. The officers then opened the trunk to find 338 pounds of marijuana, a can of air freshener under the driver’s seat and several toilet bowl sanitizers in the compartment ofthe vehicle as well as the trunk. These were all indicative of an attempt to mask the smell of marijuana. At trial, the defendant argued that he had taken his vehicle to a repair shop, implying that someone else had placed the drugs in the car. The court found that there was enough evidence, including the large amount of drugs in the trunk of the vehicle, the air freshener, and the inconsistent statements to determine that the defendant had sufficient knowledge of the marijuana in the

This is Mr. Hartshorn’s 1st DUI conviction; there are no others located in his history. Mr. Hartshorn accepts and takes responsibility for his actions that evening. Mr. Hartshorn does not believe he has a problem with alcohol. He states that he had been drinking twice a week but does not see it as a problem since he has stopped before. He advised that he has consumed alcohol since the incident, most recently around two and a half weeks ago. This was discussed with him in great detail. Based on the above information, his history, and what he reported, it is this officer’s opinion that there may be a need for a structured treatment program, and it would be a benefit to Mr. Hartshorn that he obtain an in-depth substance abuse evaluation.

Tommy Ray James, the defendant, was stopped by an officer while driving and after failing to provide insurance the defendant admitted to drinking alcohol and open containers inside the vehicle and then the defendant was then placed under arrest, put in handcuffs, and advised of his rights State v. James, 301 Kan. 898, 1 (2015). The officer then searched the defendant’s vehicle for evidence of open alcohol containers and found what was later determined to be marijuana 301 Kan. at 1. The defendant denied the marijuana being his and said it could be his brother’s 301 Kan. at 1. The defendant however, said he did not know his brother’s phone number 301 Kan. at 1. After stating he did not know his brother’s phone number Tommy offered

Mr. Landaverde reported that he was alone at the time of the incident. Mr. Landaverde reported that he was stopped by a police officer. Mr. Landaverde reported that the police officer was following him. He stated that the police officer stopped him because he did not have his turning signal on. Mr. Landaverde stated that the police officer told him that his friend’s house was under surveillance. Mr. Landaverde reported that the police officer told him that he smelled marijuana in the car. Mr. Landaverde reported that the police officer searched his vehicle and found approximately four grams of marijuana. Mr. Landaverde reported that he was arrested at 11:57 p.m. Mr. Landaverde reported that he was in jail for fourteen to sixteen

According to police reports, on 12/21/2005, the defendant, Pelkey, failed to stop at a stop sign at 2200 F Street. An officer conducted a traffic stop and vehicle search. Other officers conducted a search of his residence. Both searches discovered drugs as well as other evidence supporting the charges. The officers arrested the defendant for possession of methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine for sale, and transportation of methamphetamine. The defendant went through processing at Headquarters and booking at County Jail.

Once Matt was at the Juneau Police Department, he was asked to do a breathalyzer test for the Data Master. The officer said he observed Matt for 15 minutes then took a breathalyzer test. Matt didn’t blow consistently, to the test failed. Matt was again observed for another 15 minutes before doing another breathalyzer test and once again, he didn’t do it properly. Matt was observed for another 15 minutes before they tried the test again and his alcohol level showed 150.

On 4-8-2016 at about 2148 hrs I was northbound on Auburn Way S in about the 1500 block when I noticed a white Dodge Durang, WA/AYU1801. The vehicle was also northbound. I checked the vehicle WACIC/NCIC/DOL and the return indicated the registered owner was Albert Whiteeagle JR - 9-30-1984. A DOL check of Whiteeagle indicated that Whiteeagle's driving status was DWLS/R 1st Degree for DWLS/R 1st DG - active from 6-1-2015 and to be released 6-1-2017. I further noticed that the DOL returned indicated that Whiteeagle had been arrest two prior times for DWLS 1st Degree.

On Monday, June 20, I was not given any direct assignments as Liz was out for the day and Kathleen had finance meetings all day. That being said, I took the initiative to read over the case information of the pre-trial meetings and trials scheduled for Tuesday. This week’s pre-trial charges include: retail theft, operating without insurance, operating without a license, operating while suspended, improper turn, and failure to yield while emerging from an alley. After reading over the police reports and case information, I decided to make use of CCAP to see if the defendants had any more encounters with the law in other counties in Wisconsin. While some defendants did not have any record outside of Manitowoc, others had no record in Manitowoc, but an extensive record in other counties. This made me realize why it is so important that Liz makes use of CCAP before meeting with the defendants, because if she only sees their records in Manitowoc, she might give them a better offer for having a “clean record.” Overall, looking through the reports and histories of the defendants gives me an idea of how the defendants might behave and what kind of offers Liz might give them in the pre-trial meetings. As for the trials scheduled for Tuesday, both defendants have been charged of possession of THC. After looking through the case information, I actually recognized the cases as they had been two of the cases that were canceled earlier in the summer due to some conflict with the

Perpetration In this simulation I was able to use the preparation that I had done for Monday. This was due to the fact of not being able to participate in Monday’s simulation. I was able to reread the thoughts and notes that I written down. This provided an ability for me to feel prepared for the negations that I was about to enter.

Arrested For DUI When You Were Sober As A Judge? 4 Steps To Prove Your Innocence

I am David Alan Moore, I am Irene’s oldest son. I met Roger in 1988. I’ve noticed Roger’s heavy drinking habits, and his apparent issues with control. I’ve been a witness to emotional and physical abuse.

Ellison was issued the following Associate tickets: ticket number 140742958 operated a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition; ticket number 140742959 failed to display lighted lamps on motor vehicle/motor drawn vehicle/motorcycle as required; ticket number 140742960 failed to drive within right lane of highway having two or more lanes in the same direction. Ellison's court date is currently

While on patrol, I observed a white Ford Expedition with an expired tag travailing south bound on US-231 S. I ran the tag through dispatch and it was confirmed that the tag was expired. I then executed a traffic stop. The driver was identified as Sidney Thomas and after running his information though dispatch, it was revealed that Thomas had a Contempt of Court warrant with Troy Municipal Court. Dispatch also advised that Thomas' drivers license was suspended. I then placed Thomas under arrest and transported him to Troy City Jail with out incident. The Vehicle was inventory and towed by Pee Wee's to their impound lot. No property was taken from the Thomas. Thomas was released on a signature bond and was advised that he has 2 business

This case involves the arrest of the suspect for possession of an open container of alcohol in the park, in violation of PMC 9.24.030 (c). The suspect was cited out in the field.