3. Effective Professional Development
Professional development has been described as “ongoing learning opportunities available to teachers and other education personnel through their schools and districts.” (Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, 2011) It is a concept that is very common in the field of education. Some educators participate in it for continuing education requirements, some because it is mandated my administration, and others on a voluntarily basis to enhance their instruction and keep abreast of new best practices. Whatever reason educators have for engaging in professional development opportunities, it is a necessary part of any efforts to improve or reform a school. The CT State Education Resource Center (SERC)
…show more content…
It provides insight into their areas of expertise and elements that can be improved as it relates to student achievement. In addition, it is a tool administration can utilize to target deficient areas where he/she can offer support through staff development, peer coaching, professional development workshops, etc. and areas of strengths they can capitalize to empower others. Marzano expresses, “teacher evaluations should balance two overlapping purposes: measuring teachers’ effectiveness and developing their craft” (2012). He felt the goal of an evaluation should be to “accurately and objectively gauge teacher expertise as observed during individual lessons (i.e., measure). Beyond that ….help teachers progress during the course of their careers, from enthusiastic-if experienced-classroom neophytes straight out of college to accomplished professionals, step-by-step, year-by-year” (i.e., develop) (Marzano, 2012). With this in mind, he and a team of experts, developed a model that would accomplish these objectives. He and his colleagues created a model they call the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model. This four domain instrument evaluates Classroom Strategies and Behaviors (Domain 1), Planning and Preparing (Domain 2), Reflecting on Teaching (Domain 3), and Collegiality and Professionalism (Domain 4). Each domain is comprised of elements that paints a picture of a teacher’s …show more content…
Administrators could also work with their staff to create their own evaluation tool using ideals from the instruments above that specifically fits their school and goals. Other informal evaluative methods could also be incorporated to provide a more comprehensive, diverse, and balanced view of a professional; for instance, teacher portfolios/artifacts, teacher interviews, student surveys, parent surveys, teacher self-assessments, etc. Research has proven that there is value in using a variety of measures when evaluating teachers. Linda Darling-Hammonds shares, “To create systems that measure and encourage teacher effectiveness, it is important to use multiple measures of practice, performance, and outcomes so that a more complete picture of practice emerges, so that assessments are fair and produce the right incentives, and so that educators are encouraged to improve what they do instead of trying to game an unfair system.” (NEA, 2011) The NEA (2011) stated, “The Association recognizes that no system will be perfect and that no measurement will be exact in all circumstances and for all teachers. But NEA believes that a system that provides a plenty of information about a teacher will be more useful than one that does not-both is supporting teachers in improving their practice and
Professional development is the systematic and comprehensive approach to continuous learning that will ensure employees remain abreast and current in their field, enhance knowledge and skills, and engage in activities that will contribute to the sustained growth of Catawba Valley Community College. Each employee is responsible for developing an annual professional development plan that aligns with the Catawba Valley Community College short and long term
Based on the Georgia Department of Education, Georgia has a new way of evaluating all of its teachers. Beginners teachers are held with the same standards as tenured teachers. The evaluation is through Teacher Keys Effectiveness System (TKES) which is consist of three components which gives to an overall Teacher Effectiveness Measure (TEM). First component is Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards (TAPS). The second component is Surveys of Instructional Practice (student perception surveys). Lastly Student Growth Percentile and Student Learning Objective. (SGP and SLO).
This paper will attempt to identify my development plan starting with the beginning of my nursing career. The purpose of the paper is to determine my growth and professional goals by outlining my individual accomplishment's and career progression.
Teachers are rated as developing, proficient, accomplished, distinguished. The evaluation tool, which was updated in 2008 and in 2015 standard six was added, consist of six total standards. Standard one assesses teacher’s leadership skills. Teachers must demonstrate leadership in their classroom and in the school. Teachers must demonstrate their ability to improve the profession, advocate and assist with implementation for positive change in policies and practices affecting student learning. all while demonstrate ethical principles including honesty, integrity, fair treatment, and respect for others. For standard two teachers must demonstrate their ability establish a respect environment for a diverse population of students which involves nurturing relationships with child, embracing diversity in all forms
Professional development is an opportunity to reflect, share common goals, support each other as well as learn from others knowledge, expertise and experience. Regular supervision and training of staff can lead to reduced sickness and absence, it can improve the service that they
Professional development is a purposeful and intentional process. According to Guskey T. (2000) it is a consciously designed effort to bring about positive change and improvement. True professional development is a deliberate process, guided by clear vision of purposes and planned goals. These goals form the criteria by which content and materials are selected, process and procedures developed, and assessment and evaluations prepared. Professional development programs are designed to enable one to explore their values, attitudes, styles and interpersonal skills and to provide a platform for continuing personal development as a manager or leader. It refers to skills and knowledge attained for both personal development and
Ch. 2 – Who are the various users of assessment and its results? What specific instructional decisions can be made based on assessment results? Why must we build balanced assessment systems to support the instructional programs we offer students? This chapter nails down the purpose of assessing, which is gathering information to inform teachers of students of their instruction and learning, respectively. In this way, assessment is individualized to each student and classroom, and because all students/classes are different, it should inform the teachers of what is working or not working in the classroom, which should then influence some sort of change to instruction. This chapter also talks about the different levels of assessment – from the individuals
In 2013 the Englewood public school system adopted the Danielson framework to evaluate teachers. Prior to the Danielson framework teachers we evaluated through a district created evaluation system. The change to the Danielson evaluation too was very tumultuous as the administrator as well as the teachers had to become acclimated to the new method. Unlike the previous measurement tool Danielson divided teaching practice into four domains. Each domain address different aspects of teaching practice that once achieved is supposed to resulting in more effective teaching and higher student academic achievement. Each domain has a level
In this article, Dana shares her considerations in the Professional Development School (PDS) community based on her experience in the field over 25 years. The author argues the purpose and problems she observed following three issues. (1) University Research versus Practitioner Research, which she claims setting the difference between both research types and making teacher aware should be beneficial to improve their teaching; (2) Inquiry as Project versus Inquiry as Stance, which she suggests that teachers should take an inquiry stance towards their teaching to constantly improve
Holding educators to student performances on standardized tests is a current trend being utilized by state and local school boards, but the standards to which teachers are being held are vague and leave teachers lost on how to improve their craft. In 2013, the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation funded a study of current teacher practices in order to identify effective strategies linked to increased student achievement. The data obtained from the study lead to discussions surrounding the current teacher evaluation process. Those discussions have led to a realization that evaluations tied to specific teacher feedback appeared to have greater impact on teacher improvement and as a result, increased student achievement (Goodwin & Hein, 2016). In the search for any artifacts involving the formalization of teacher evaluations, one article provided a guideline which state and local educational governing bodies could use when creating evaluation criteria for teachers. According to the findings cited in the article, “developing a comprehensive teacher evaluation system is far from straight forward [and] policymakers should make every effort to ensure teachers are being evaluated fairly and accurately” (Hull,
In the state of South Dakota, the legal requirements of the state and school districts when it comes to supervision and procedures, expectations align with both. The state of South Dakota has adopted the Teacher Effectiveness Model along with any district that is state accredited. This model is based on the Danielson framework, which consists of 22 components, clustered into domains one through four (Danielson, 2007). According to this model, teachers from year one to year three are evaluated at least annually and those teachers year four and beyond are evaluated at least every other year. The state formed a work group made up of teachers and administrators who developed an evaluation instrument that will not only be a tool for administrators to use, but also for teachers.
Professional Development measures the degree to which teachers value continuous personal development and school-wide improvement.
Education reform takes on different forms depending on the goals of reformers. However, most will agree their ultimate goal is to positively impact student achievement. Changes in public education continues to increase teacher accountability, as well as, update curriculum standards and standardized tests. The teacher evaluation system is one focus of recent initiatives. While district implement new teacher evaluation methods, skepticism surrounds its effectiveness, in improving teaching, and comprehensiveness, in assessing the multi-faceted role a teacher plays in the lives of students. I have experienced the good, bad, and ugly of the teacher evaluation system of Shelby County.
You made an interesting statement about having an institutional learning as part of the routine professional development in organizations. I like to add insights about routine professional development in organizations. Professional development should be instituted in organizations as a routine to keep up with market trends, industry trends, or even just the scope of the product or service. “Moreover, professional development also means that the protagonist is the professional him/herself and not only an external expert” (Nasciutti, et al., 2016, pg.88). It is about having the formal, ongoing efforts that help the organizations to improve their performance and self-fulfillment through a wide range of applications from education in highly
The topic of teacher evaluation hinges on the interactions of two separate pairs of variables. The first pair of those variables, formative and summative evaluation, pertains to the actual evaluation itself, whereas the second pair, teachers and administrators, involves the professionals who take part in the evaluation process. The reader may recall from the preceding section that the prevailing literature contains certain perspectives and recommendations with regard to evaluative practices that encompass all of these factors.