Effects Of Defoorestation In Brazil

Deforestation poses an alarming threat to Brazil’s Amazon rainforest, and it has been a serious concern for over 40 years. For thousands of years, the abundant, valuable resources in the Amazon were familiar only to the indigenous people of the region. In the 1500’s, before European colonization of Brazil, there were an estimated six to nine million individuals part of different cultures that made up a rich Amazonian society (“History”). Surrounded by the luxuriant rainforest and its natural resources, these indigenous tribes were able to thrive by utilizing the resources without destroying their habitat. After European emigration, the government of Brazil exploited the value of the Amazon’s resources in the twentieth century. In the 1970’s, the Brazilian government discovered the “untapped source of boundless potential” hiding in the Amazon and began using incentives to persuade settlers to develop its resources (Casey). Once economists realized the importance of the resources found within the rainforest, European pioneers set out to transform the Amazon into their home. By endorsing colonization, the government could not only boost the country’s economy, but also gain control over Brazil’s vast territory. The government supported migration to the rainforest and campaigned for the construction of infrastructure (“History”). In concurrence, the development of roads such as the Trans-Amazonian Highway, a 2,000 mile road built in 1972, granted people and machinery entrance to

Livestock and farms may not be nearly as profitable as a living, considering the thriving forests on a planetary scale.That is saying that regardless to the benefits of deforestation they aren't helping because the are using the trees for profits the trees are going away since no additional trees are planted. In the text Good bye rain forest it states “that One reason is that tropical rain forests contain valuable timber-such as walnut, mahogany, rosewood, balsa, sandalwood, and teak. Tropical woods are used for flooring, furniture, railroad ties, boatbuilding, bowls, drawing boards, and even toys. One tree can be Worth hundreds of dollars. This is saying that one main reason that they are cutting down the trees are because of what type of wood it is and they are also cutting it down for what the wood can make”. In the text Goodbye rain forest it states “As more and more trees are cut, fewer remain and the price of timber rises. In the text Rainforest Resources it states that “Many kinds of hardwoods are found in the Amazon Rainforest. Hardwoods are used to make furniture, musical instruments, boats, and even coffins. Some of these hardwoods include teak, rosewood, and mahogany.

However, due to more people searching for plots there is greater pressure on the amount of available land. The logging industry is responsible for a relatively small level of deforestation, accounting for 3% in Brazil. Consequently, all these activity contribute together to the rapid loss of what is left of the rainforest and a large proportion of the world’s biodiversity. All of the resources that the rainforest provides could be lost in the next 40 years.

Deforestation is defined as: “the clearing of virgin forests, or intentional destruction or removal of trees and other vegetation for agricultural, commercial, housing, or firewood use without replanting and without allowing time for the forest to regenerate itself” (SCRIBD). Deforestation has been a problem in Latin America since the early 1900s and the severity of the dilemma is increasing rapidly. Deforestation not only has consequences for the environment, but also, the indigenous people and the national economy. The logging industry in Latin America is often exploited by multinational companies that are not properly regulated. The land that has provided a home and cultivated indigenous development for centuries is being dissipated rapidly. Due to an exponentially growing global population, there is an increased demand for low priced goods--like timber, crops, and meat. Many Latin American countries value revenue from selling these goods over the health of their local ecosystems. The crisis of deforestation and habitat loss is shifting from a local to global problem. As deforestation continues, global warming escalates worldwide, impacting every country and person. About 15 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions come from tropical deforestation, which is more than from all the world’s cars, trucks and buses combined (Schwartzman). Puerto Rico and Brazil provide contrasting examples of the impact of deforestation. Puerto Rico had an economic and environmental shift

Deforestation in the amazon was the result of farmers increasing their farms to hold the

Indigenous rights in Brazil have been very vague throughout the years and were difficult to obtain since many indigenous tribes were seen as an inferior class. There are around 900,000 indigenous people with a total of 240 tribes in Brazil in contrast to the 11 million indigenous people that lived there before the European colonist arrived. It was predicted that 90% died in the first years from diseases that they were not exposed to, such as the flu and smallpox, and the rest who survived the diseases were enslaved. Brazil has one third of the world’s rainforest and half of the amazon forest, but with the expansion of neoliberal policies deforestation has become a serious problem. According to Brazilian authorities, the rubber and cattle industries are responsible for 80% of the deforestation (COHA). This has evidently affected many indigenous communities that lived in the Amazon forest, displacing them from their lands and exploiting them for hard labor. By the 1950s, many predicted that the indigenous population in Brazil would disappear, but they have been able to recover by becoming active in the movement against neoliberal policies and their rights as human.

Deforestation, pollution, poaching, and soil abuse are just four of the innumerable factors that lead to deleterious effects on the environment. With more and more trees falling under the determined chainsaws and axe blows of illegal loggers and soil loss from tenuous irrigation methods, South American governments have a rising concern to protect its ecosystem. But an unusual, and equally controversial, solution came not within the restraining bounds of the country borders, but from the efforts of the American multi-millionaire and philanthropic conservationist, Douglas Tompkins. Concerned about the ecology of South America, Tompkins purchased sumptuous strips of forest land to shield it from the venomous ways of poachers and illegal loggers.

The Amazon Rainforest has an issue that needs to be fixed. The problem that the rainforest has is that the groups continue to cut or burn down trees just so they can grow crops. It needs to stop because it’s hurting The Rubber Tappers. They need the trees to do their job and the government isn’t doing enough to help out. The Rubber Tappers have been living in the rainforest for 100’s of years. The Rubber Tappers came in the 1870’s. As you can see in their way of living does no harm to the rainforest. They make their way of living from the rainforest by harvesting sap from the rubber trees. The Rubber Tappers should have control of the Amazon Rainforest and here are some reasons why. For example, The Rubber Tappers use the resource of the Amazon by

Stewardship and economical asset use and how they apply to the Amazon Rainforest: Maybe the most perfect way to deal with location deforestation in the Amazon is by building up another insurance course of action in light of the principle of supportable usage and change of rainforests. Sensible change is an expression that has been used every now and again over the earlier decade, however savants will quickly tell you that assembling natural items, latex, and nuts from the rainforests is inadequate make a living also reinforce a creating economy. "Financial Improvement" should consider a shrouded thinking to be joined through technique to distinctive experts and business undertakings included in the usage and progression of rainforest grounds and resources. Under Brazilian law, a critical piece of the Amazon is fundamentally an open access resource, so there negligible catalyst for squatters, farmers, or originators to use timberland grounds or resources in a conservative way.

This policy memo addresses the development and expansion of the cattle ranching industry in Brazil, which has contributed to the mass deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon in the last 40 years. It exposes the regional and global consequences to deforestation and provides strategies for the Brazilian government to sustainably manage cattle ranching industries while protecting the future of the Amazon. The rainforest ecosystem is an immense reserve of natural recourses that is far more valuable than the beef produced on Brazilian cattle ranches. Not only does the rainforest create habitat for up to 65% of the world’s biodiversity, but when harvested sustainably, it provides humans with an abundance of spices, foods, oils, medicines

To me, this is more surprise than the shrinking of Amazon. Seems like WE are not only eating meats but also “eating” lots of trees. However most of the people don’t know this. People are not getting informed enough, or some people may just don’t care–the major concern of their life is not the environment but money. “To me. A 40% increase in deforestation doesn’t mean anything at all, and I don’t feel the slightest guilt over what we are doing here. We are talking about an area larger than Europe that has barely been touched, so there is nothing at all to get worried about.” Said Blairo Maggi, one of the largest soybean producers, transporter and exporter in Brazil, the king of soybean who has called

In 2007 the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private sector of the World Bank Group, lent to the largest beef processors in Brazil, Bertin LTDA. The demand for beef increase as world’s population does. The increased in Brazilian’s cattle industry is by far considered the Amazon rain forest biggest threats. After the loan environmentalist believe that the rate of deforestation in Amazon Rain forest increase due to the financing and modernization of Brazilian cattle industry. At the time the cattle industry was and still one of the main contributors of the deforestation of the Rain forest. To supply the increasing demands of slaughterhouses, farmers are encouraged to clear huge areas of rain forest to increase the area to rear cattle. Even IFC’s own pre-loan analysis indicated that the risks could be irreversible/ or unprecedented, that shows that Knowingly they went forward on stimulating a destructive activity that is the main of Amazon’s deforestation.

How does Trade and the environment effect Brazil? In Brazil according to Stanford studies “soybean production has become a significant force for economic development in Brazil, but has come at the cost of expansion into non-protected forests in the Amazon and native savanna in the Cerrado. They continue on by saying, “For more than three decades, deforestation in the Amazon has been driven by the expansion of pasturelands for cattle production. Pasture area also expanded rapidly because soils found throughout much of the region are poor in nutrients following forest slash and burn, and crop production cannot be maintained in the face of degradation of soils and lost vegetation productivity”

South America is seen to be an epicenter to a bustling and vibrant population, but in the depths of the continent—quiet literally- there are areas of this region tend to have scarce populations. For instance, the Amazon rainforest, which runs through nine countries, has an abundance of biodiversity, but the very few people who live there are tribal and have yet to reach the Neolithic revolution. Populations are scarce due to the climate of the Amazon rainforest rendering the soil mostly infertile and only usable for a short amount of time. However, the Amazon river’s providence of diverse fish comes in multiple uses for the population. To combat a lack of harvest, farmers often must keep moving to new grounds, clearing trees, to be able to properly harvest crops. This poses a problem as deforestation is inhibiting and decapitating the forest, often making the forest drier which threatens more wild fires. Companies also tend to use deforestation for business, which leaves room for us hurting the already scarce and indigenous tribes and biodiversity that belong to the

Humans have always cleared the forest for our own interests, but in the past, the process was slow and only limited regions were deforested, generally for subsistence agriculture. However, today, humanity is far more efficient at clearing the forest with our advanced technology and machinery and our almost maniacal drive to earn profits in the near term. Ranching Cattle ranches are created in the rainforest for many fast food companies.