Effects Of Pesticides On The Environment Essay

We have to voice up in order to let the public aware of the hazardous pesticides. In Wrath of Grapes Boycott Speech by Cesar Chavez, Chavez talks about the effects of using different types of pesticides in agriculture especially grapes. He argues that the pesticides not only harm the consumer, in fact it also harms the farmworkers and their families. Therefore, Chavez sincerely wants to tell the public that we should be aware of the usage of the pesticides by publishing this speech. In his speech he uses scientific researches to support his argument on the usage of pesticides. First, Chavez used the report from Environmental Protection Agency’s statistics to claim the pesticide used is more harmful than consumers think and it is also not that

Agriculture is the most fundamental resource of society. Without it, humans could not live, especially in the ways we do now where people reside in cities. This means that those cities could not exist without large scale agriculture to sustain them. Since agriculture is such a necessity, people have developed methods to gain more from their land. One of the many solutions besides machinery they have developed to produce higher crop yields is through the use of pesticides. However, those pesticides which have resulted in high crop yields have come at price, and that is human health itself. This seems rather contradictory. Pesticides were designed to help people and society by increased the success of producing high crop yields, and they

This suggests that the roadsides was once beautiful and bloomed with healthy and lively vegetation; however, they are now destroyed due to the use of pesticides. From these examples, it can be shown that even though pesticide is beneficial, its deadly effects outweigh its benefits; in addition, it is a dangerous substances to the environment, organisms, and even human.

Many economically important field crops in the United States depends on the labor of migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Over the past years the United States has had the largest population of immigrants. Of course many of these immigrants are from different places in the world; but the largest population is from Latin America. Over half of the immigrant population is from Latin America and almost 40% entered the US in the past decade (Pransky, 2002). Recently many of these immigrate live and work in the metropolitan area. The ages rang from 18 to 64. Considering the number of immigrants thriving the health status and needs of immigrants is important. This issue of immigrant farmworker is not being discussed in day to day basis. Many of these immigrants migrate for work but find themselves living in poverty, language barriers, working conditions, no health insurance and etc...Agriculture in the United States highly depends on chemicals like pesticide, growth regulator, and fertilizer. Every year 1 billion chemical is applied. Considering the amount of chemicals applied migrate are at a high risk of pesticide exposure since chemicals are in water, soil and plants. Pesticide exposure means getting pesticides in or on the body. This article will discuss four primary immigrates, reasons immigrate farm workers work mostly on fields, farm owner’s benefits, stress, pesticide explores, heavy machinery and treatments after being hurt. All of these terms will describe how they affects

matter of concern recently because of the research results and evaluations of what the pesticide

It is also shown that pesticides are partly responsible for the rising cancer rates and birth defects among children (“Pesticides”).

Pesticides are poisonous, made to kill, but does a good service. Insecticides another poison eradicated typhoid and malaria and both the herbicides and insecticides are acknowledge for America’s bountiful production in agricultural. Knowing the potential effects and what is killed by the chemicals caused the historians Cristopher J. Bosso to proclaim FIFRA “one of the granddaddies of federal regulation”

Cancer constitutes a challenging trial in numerous lives in our world. It not only alters a person’s livelihood and longevity, but it also affects family, friends, and society. Cancer cases have risen over the years. Subsequently, scientists and doctors strive to arrive at a solution to combat this serious dilemma. The complexity and variety of the disease complicates the process. Studies and research initiate ideas and theories between possible reasons for the growing numbers of cancer. One area of cancer research is on the effects of agricultural pesticides on human health. Although, agricultural pesticides have benefits, research shows agricultural pesticides also increase cancer risk, especially in children and farmers.

Can there be side effects from consuming chemicals on our fruits and vegetables now or later down the road? According to an 18-month study of sperm samples from 155 men who ate fruits and veggies with pesticides on them had a 49 % lower total sperm count and 32% fewer sperm that were shaped normally. Compared that to the group of men who ate the pesticide-free produce these men had normal shaped sperm and count. The more pesticides a man had exposure to the more sperm he had that were deformed. Oaklander, (2015). To me, this looks like an example of side effects of eating chemicals on our fruits and veggies. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, Children are especially at risk as the child's diet is the dominant source of exposure to pesticides Bauers, (2014, May 12). I have my own suspicions about how exposure to these chemicals could affect the children of this generation. I have found no sources to back this up except for my personal experience working with children. What if some of the mental, physical, and learning disabilities that the children of this generation are suffering from are from exposure to the chemicals that they are eating on their fruits and vegetables. I have noticed that when the parents of these children take them off of the conventional fruits and veggies and start having them eating the organic varieties. Some of the symptoms of their disabilities disappear, On the other hand, if they get off of the organic varieties and back onto the conventional varieties of the symptoms come back full

The majority of the risk of toxicity in humans revolves around the farm workers, because most the excessive exposure to chemicals is when preparing and applying them (Damalas & Elefther). Unintentional or unknown risks can also be a significant worry. According to another study, organic honey was evaluated. Samples from an organic honey bee hive were analyzed and found to have more than 150 different pesticides, accounting for the three to four mile radius of the bees' flight (Al-Waili, Salom, Al-Ghamdi, & Ansari, 2012). This would result in an unknown or unrealized toxicity, even without significant mistakes in application. When considering the availability to access of these chemicals is usually related to farm workers, it is understandable

One concern about pesticides and herbicide usage is the amount of residues left on the end product of crops sprayed with the chemicals, and their effects on human health. (Williamson, 2007, p. 184). However, these effects are closely tested and levels are strictly regulated to ensure there is no danger from possible pesticide residues. Since 1910, many rules, regulations, and agencies have been formed to monitor the safety of the pesticides and herbicides used in conventional farming. These chemicals must meet specific safety standards in order to be registered for use, and regulations on levels of each product safe for use are also put in place. (Tafel et al.,2007, p.184). All pesticides are rigorously examined to ensure they have no significant effects on human health, or the environment. The residues in the food chain are closely monitored, and regularly tested, to ensure they are below legal limits. In a recent survey of residues

The Dow Chemical Company specializes in agricultural chemicals such as pesticides. I used the pesticides listed on their website to cross reference what pesticides are being used in Salinas and in the town of Monte Maiz in Argentina. Monte Maiz is a town that has been plagued with cancer and neurological damages to pregnant mothers fetuses because of the high concentration and persistence of pesticides in the community. Through cross-referencing chemicals I found that the insecticide Lorsban 48 E, also known as chlorpyrifos, is used on the soybean crops in Argentina (DOW AgroSciences, np). Here in the Salinas Valley the same chemical, chlorpyrifos, is being used on apple orchards primarily in Watsonville, a city here in the county. The consequences and effects of chlorpyrifos being used in Monte Maiz illustrate the potential ramifications of the use of this harmful chemical. Due to a director at the local hospital in Monte Maiz noticing increases in patients with cancer, an organization, the Network for the Protection of Health and Environment, conducted research on the town. The team concluded, “ One of the most significant findings obtained from the survey was that while the expectation of new cancer cases in Monte Maiz was 11 per year, in 2014 the town had 35 cases - three times as many. The town also had five times the national average of spontaneous abortions - and 50% of children between six and seven years had respiratory

In today’s society chemicals, whether you like it or not are a fact of life. Many people are afraid of chemicals and their effects on them and the environment. This is understandable because the truth of the matter is that chemicals can do some horrible things to humans, animals and the whole ecosystem. Some would say that chemicals should be done away with for these reasons. But this certainly is not true and most likely impossible. Chemicals can also have some very positive effects on our lives. Some uneducated people would argue that there should not be restrictions on chemicals. This is just as crazy as saying that chemicals should be done away with. If chemicals are regulated and people abide

The health of the workers spraying pesticides in cotton fields and its inhabitants are badly affected. There by causing symptoms like headache, nausea, tremors, depression, seizures, loss of consciousness, and, in some extreme cases – death. Empty pesticides containers are reused which again harm the environment and leaves its negative effect on the health of its users. The use of such toxic leads to air, water and soil pollution. Apart from the pests, pesticides also cause great harm and leads to death of small animals and birds consuming them inadvertently. According to W.H.O there have been nearly 2 billion USD worth of pesticides used annually, of which pesticides worth about 819 million have been declared

This data help notably to know human exposure to pesticide residues during dietary intake and also serve in improving pesticide action plan in the land. The monitoring program for pesticide residues should be established routinely to provide a check on compliance with best agricultural practice on the use of pesticides.17-20 Optimally, pesticide monitoring should scanning all pesticides in all samples. This requirement implies that, theoretically, all pesticides have to be detected in all items. In reality, because of what is known about the expected pesticides used against the pests attacking grapes fruits and leaves, analyses have to be limited to those pesticides that are practically used, i.e. organophosphate and carbamate insecticides.21