Effects Of The Atlantic Slave Trade

The famous quote, “sharing is caring” can be misleading in terms of world history by how sharing with other regions of the world not only can be a positive element but as well as a negative. The idea of trading with other regions was a very popular concept because many trading accusations included benefits for both sides of the deals. Unfortunately, some regions that participate in a trade can be victims of a negative effect. The regions that engaged in trade that either had a positive or negative effect was Africa and Europe.

Everyone has their own understanding of what slavery is, but there are misconceptions about the history of “slavery”. Not many people understand how the slave trade initially began. Originally Africa had “slaves” but they were servants or serfs, sometimes these people could be part of the master’s family. They could own land, rise to positions of power, and even purchase their freedom. This changed when white captains came to Africa and offered weapons, rum, and manufactured goods for people. African kings and merchants gave away the criminals, debtors, and prisoner from rival tribes. The demand for cheap labor was increasing, this resulted in the forced migration of over ten million slaves. The Atlantic Slave Trade occurred from 1500 to 1880 CE. This large-scale event changed the economy and histories of many places. The Atlantic Slave Trade held a great amount of significance in the development of America. Africans shaped America by building a solid foundation for the country.

The transatlantic slave trade began in the 15th century, after the Portuguese started exploring the coast of West Africa. This had a long term effect on Africa because even though it started out benefiting the upper class in Africa, the long term effect was devastating. When Europeans started to enter Africa, they enjoyed “the triple advantage of guns and other technology, widespread literacy, and the political organization necessary to sustain expensive programs of exploration and conquest”(Doc 4). Africa’s relations with Europe depended on common interests, which Europe did not share. Europe’s contact with Africa, involving economic exchanges and political relationships, was not mutually beneficial.

The Atlantic Slave Trade involved the forced intercontinental migration of West Africans across the Middle Passage during the 17th to 19th centuries. Between twelve and fifteen million slaves were exchanged between Africa, Europe and the Americas, together with raw materials and manufactured goods.

During the mid-fifteenth century, the transatlantic slave trade occurred throughout the world and lasted well over four hundred years. Oversea trade between Africa and the Portuguese, along with other European kingdoms, formed, which began what is known as the transatlantic slave trade. Along with a variety of goods, copious amounts of slaves, roughly twenty-five million, were traded between the continents of Europe and Africa. Driving the trade were politics, economics, religion, business, and a desire for profit. Along with the majority of the African population being traded elsewhere in the world, the overwhelming amount of deaths and low fertility rate among the indigenous people neared the African culture to distinction. Among the documents provided, all can be grouped into two main groups: attitudes and impact. During the years 1450 to 1800, the Europeans showed a large amount of varied opinions towards the Transatlantic Trade slave and the impact of the trade towards the included civilizations.

The history of the Atlantic slave trade is long and sordid, from the working and transportation conditions to the structure of the trade itself. Historians and scholars from all backgrounds have worked to understand the impact of slavery and why it went on for so long. Two scholars, John Thornton and Mariana Candido, have extensively studied both the impact and organization of the Atlantic slave trade, but disagree on a few main conclusions. Upon thorough review of both sides, however, John Thornton’s ideas regarding the Atlantic trade are more convincing than Candido’s, and by looking deeper into each side it is clear why.

Throughout the 1550’s to the 1850’s the African Americans and Native Americans being enslaved was very catastrophic but greatly benefitted the Europeans. In some ways however the effects of it were good for the African Americans, in such a way that it brought the race together and eventually made people realize that they are the same as everybody else. Same for the Europeans, although at that time it benefitted most of them, the effects could also be very bad, in a way that it brought the civil war and lowered not just the population of African Americans and Native Americans but also lowered the population of their race, the Europeans, at that current time.

The effects of the development of the Atlantic Slave Trade had impacted the participating civilizations in 1450-1750. Many slaves were treated brutally. Some countries prospered as others died, and a new source of cheap labor has been found. The demand for cheap labor in 1450 to 1750 has caused economic, social, and political effects on civilizations from Europe, America, and Africa participating in the Atlantic Slave Trade by causing the downfall of African tribes and race, hardships of surviving slave life and leading European countries to become rich.

Slaves were present to newly diseases and endure from malnutrition lingering before they stretch the unspent globe. It is inspire that the superiority of deaths on the course across the Atlantic - the intermediate death - happen during the first leash of weeks and were a proceed of malnutrition and indisposition attack during the hurried marches and succeeding burial at vassal leaguer on the

The Trans-Atlantic slave trade lasted from the sixteenth century until the nineteenth century and involved the forced migration of millions of Africans to America. Strong and fit adults were seized from their homes in West Africa by other tribes or Europeans and were sold into slavery, shipped across the Atlantic Ocean, and sold to owners in North and South America. Although the Trans-Atlantic slave trade was politically and financially beneficial to a few high ranking African individuals, the political, economic, social, and cultural effects that it had on Africa were disastrous. The slave trade was financially rewarding to political figures who supported it and created an increase in violence because larger tribes would kidnap members of smaller tribes

African American slave trade was gruesome, barbaric, and just evil until 1865 when there was a shred of hope from the emancipation proclamation. At the time that slavery was established it was more of an institution instead of a slave trade; the number was small but slaves worked in all the colonies. Before the constitution was established Northern states either abolished slavery or they made laws for gradual emancipation of slaves. The ordinance of 1787 kept many slaves from new territories, so with that slavery only existed in the south where they became regions “peculiar institution. In this time slavery was just starting to soon become a way of life for many Americans including slaves themselves.

Did you know the causes and effects of African slave trade in the Atlantic region caused millions of people to die? Starting off when we got to America, we used the native Americans as our labor force. The problems with this is that the men had little knowledge of farming because it was women's work. They also had poor immune systems and the English's diseases were new to them so they died by the thousands. The native Americans also knew the land very well and could run away. They could also just go to another group because all the Indians looked similar. So a different choice was needed, we ended up choosing the Africans. The men did the farming, women could cook, they had better immune systems, they didn't know the land well,

In 1510, King Ferdinand of Spain sent 200 Africans to his nation’s colonies in the Americas to clear land and to work rice, sugar, tobacco, and other crops. The African slaves resisted European diseases more than indigenous Americans and European indentured servants; and, readily adapted to agricultural work in tropical climates. As the African’s work proved fruitful, the Spanish and Portuguese soon entered into trans-Atlantic slave trade agreements with various ethnic nations in Africa to ensure a continual supply of labor for their expanding agricultural economies in Brazil, the Caribbean, and the Americas. In response to demands for African labor from other countries, the Spanish Crown developed a system of licenses, 'Asientos ', that allowed merchants from Portugal, Holland and Britain to purchase slaves at wholesale costs that ranged from three dollars to twenty dollars.

In today’s world it is widely know and accepted that money makes the world go round but, unfortunately that is not the question. The question is: what made the world go round in the early 1600’s? Surprisingly, just like the world today money made the world go around back then also. One major difference is that in today’s world machines do all of our dirty work, back then it was all up to the slaves. Finding the perfect slave was a challenge to the colonists. First, there was the indentured servants, second, came the Indians. However because Indians and indentured servants could escape to freedom with ease, they were not the ideal slaves. The colonists’ third attempt proved to be a gold mine. The unfortunate people who were forced in to

The Atlantic slave trade existed from the 16th to the early 19th century and stimulated trade between Europe, Africa, and the Americas. Over 12 million Africans were captured and sold into chattel slavery off the coast of West Africa, and more than 2 million of them died crossing the Atlantic. These outcomes of the slave trade are rarely disputed among historians; the effect of the Atlantic slave trade in Africa, however, is often a topic of debate. Some academics, such as Walter Rodney, insist that Africans were forced to take part in the slave trade, resulting in demographic disruption and underdevelopment in all sectors of Africa. Historian John Thornton acknowledges the negative consequences of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, yet contends that it was merely an expansion of the existing internal slave trade which African rulers engaged in willingly. A final case made by Hugh Thomas completely contradicts Rodney’s thesis, asserting that the slave trade was not solely responsible for decreasing Africa’s population, and furthermore, that it was primarily beneficial to Africa’s economy and politics. The true outcome of the slave trade in Africa lies not entirely in any one of these arguments, but rests rather in a combination of all three. Although the Atlantic slave trade was detrimental to the economic and social development of Africa, the trade benefited a small portion of Africans, who willingly aligned themselves with