Effects of Shoplifting in the Society Essay

The obvious reason that someone would 'love' shoplifting would be that she wanted to have items she could not obtain with her current paycheck. However, the author does have a job, and over the course of the essay she does not specifically identify many expensive items that she would like to possess but cannot buy. "Everything changes when I shoplift. I'm no longer negotiating with faceless, inhuman entities that have no concern for my welfare; instead, I'm taking what I need without giving anything up." Her main complaint with capitalism is the impersonality of its

He's just robbed a grocery store and the cops are after him" (153) After reading this quote, the

When a city does not have the resources to deal with a large volume of crime, the justice system can seem like a revolving door for the criminals. If the smaller criminals have to be overlooked because the system is swamped with major crimes, then the threat of jail time for shoplifting looses its power. Time after time we see both Fred do little jail time for his crimes. The first time me meet Fred, he’s accidentally been released from jail after only doing 60 days of a one year sentence. He’s been out of jail for one day and he’s already back to shoplifting. Four months later Fred is arrested for Grand Larceny and Vehicular Homicide. He uses an alias along with a phony I.D. to hide his extensive criminal record and ends up out of jail in just three weeks after plea-bargaining down to minor charges as a “first offender”. Fred was responsible for the death of someone and because of an overwhelmed justice system he is set free. After you get away with something like this how much of a deterrent is the law when it comes to shoplifting? Not much to Fred because just three months later he’s arrested for stealing silverware and end up in jail for six months. Of course each time we see the thieves’ stealing they are always with a friend, an accomplice, someone who thinks and acts the same way they do.

serious crimes and remain the second most prevalent offense in the United States after larceny or

getting caught, if they were caught they would be punished, not for stealing but for getting

Petty theft is one of the more common crimes in this time. It involved stealing bread or cloths or other small, cheap

Which leads to this statement “I stole and I stole generously” states many people who make a decision to involve themselves in criminal activity is not to help themselves, but also as a way to help their loves one too.

The scale of shoplifting in the United Kingdom in the past few years has changed to worrying levels, this is also true of the scope of shoplifting as well. The Office of National Statistics have reported 321,008 police recorded shoplifting incidents from April 2013 to March 2014 (See Statistics 2010,), along with this articles have shown 34 of policed forces across the UK have presented a 6% increase in shoplifting (Pidd & Collier, 2014). Such academics as Klemke (1978) have claimed that shoplifting significantly reduces with age (See Egan & Taylor, 2010), it seems to be a so-called hobby that is popular amongst the younger generations, particularly adolescents.

Committing an injustice to the law, whether it is of misdemeanor or felony in nature, the consequences will always have a subsequently negative affect on what that person's future may hold. For example, when applying for a job, criminal information is required to be supplied and, more than likely will be researched. If you should "have

The definition of theft is taking other people’s property without that person’s consent or permission. In today’s world thievery can be seen as a major sin because the punishment can be life in jail. An example of this major sin is Bonnie and Clyde. During the depression they went on a two year crime spree. In the process of stealing from small companies and large companies to sustain themselves for the depression, they stole many cars for getaways.

While watching the Simpsons episode “Marge be not Proud”, I viewed multiple deviant behaviors. No more than two minutes into the episode I found an example of deviance, so I suspected there would be many others I could use during this assignment. Throughout the episode, one of the most important behaviors I found was both deviant and criminal. This behavior was shoplifting.

It doesn’t directly impact the individual, instead, it persists due to its positive consequences on a large scale. For example, when an individual chooses not to steal, they are not rewarded directly, in fact, the choice may seem counterintuitive because it may negatively impact their life in the short run. However, the individual’s choice to not steal from John today, reduces the likelihood that John will rob him back next week. Because John feels respected and safe in the community, he respects the mutual agreement and all is good in the world. Although it is easier and more gratifying for an individual to be able to do whatever he want to others, it can be quite terrible to experience the same actions pursued against him, hence, the need for justice.

If my parents had been laid off at work and I had the opportunity to steal a loaf of bread at the bakery, I would not steal the loaf of bread for my famished family. Taken into consideration, these are the three factors that have influenced my decision on why I would not steal the bread. They are also reasons why larceny is unacceptable and why it should be restrained. First off, there is an abounding number of solutions that can be implemented, in order to exterminate the vigorous temptations/needs of stealing. Secondly, the aftermath of larceny has a devastatingly negative fallout on those around you. Furthermore, the results of larceny tend to result in various long term negative effects. Therefore these fundamental reasons are why

Thieves, for example, often worked in three categories, which included by themselves, as loners, or as a member in in street-level identity theft rings, or in occupational teams (Copes and Vieraitis (2012). The techniques often used by the thieves to commit their crimes were quite mundane despite the public perception of white collar crime being a high tech and computer driven crime. For example, offenders restored digging through trash cans, stealing mail from individuals mailbox, low methods of technology, and would often have workers, whom were under their payroll, steal information from their employers. It was concluded by Copes and Vieraitis (2012) that identity thieves often were not quite different from street offenders when it came to their motivations and neutralizations as to why they committed the crime. For example, Copes and Vieraitis (2012) claimed that identity thieves often committed crimes as a result of the need for money and the thrill and power which was often exerted and came with committing the act, due to the pressure and anticipation of the act itself. Lastly, identity thieves often justified their crimes, similar to that of street offenders, through relying primarily on denial of injury, denial of the victim, appeal to higher loyalties and sad tales, thus, allowing them to minimize the damage to his or her self concept and allow them to

At present, stealing comprises a much broader kinds of activities than it used to; it would be enough to remember shop-lifting or numerous facts of counterfeit product utilization when intellectual property is stolen against copyright-based laws and regulations. Stealing, therefore, is expanding and spreading; moreover, the very notion of what is stealing becomes modified and fuzzy. What are then the instruments that the consequential approach