preview

Egalitarian Model Of Narcotics Anonymous (NA)

Better Essays

Narcotics Anonymous, or NA, is a twelve-step program much like the more popular Alcoholics Anonymous. NA maintains that all members of the group are important in the unity of the group and that in no way does one individual rule over another. As a person in recovery and member of NA I have learned, through literature, meetings, and my sponsor, that NA is built upon an egalitarian model. A study done by Jeffrey K. Snyder and Daniel M. Fessler has determined that NA is an egalitarian organization that is unique in that “brings into stark relief the conflict between egalitarianism and the social dynamics of knowledge transmission.” By this Snyder and Fessler mean that because of the process that keeps addicts clean is based on gaining knowledge …show more content…

This is true and has personally worked in my life through attending meetings and fellowshipping, or hanging out with other recovering addicts. Meetings themselves, as Snyder and Fessler explain, “have strong norms governing participation (cf. Ma ̈kela ̈ et al. 1996 regarding AA): turn taking is cardinal, individuals should only speak about themselves, individuals should not directly contradict previous speakers’ statements, nor should direct advice be offered, and members should not endorse outside entities.” Snyder and Fessler go on to conclude that the layouts of NA meetings are “overtly egalitarian.” Additionally, they find that although these meetings function and operate as egalitarian, the members themselves rely on mutualistic relationships in which “NA orthodoxy holds that the characteristics of the addict are such as to necessitate egalitarianism if addicts are to help one another in mutualistic interactions.” For members of NA, this means that the egalitarian model works because members are willing to be apart of the relationships that are essential to their recovery. Within these meetings and fellowshipping opportunities, members with a substantial amount of clean time who are very knowledgeable of the Basic Text, Twelve Steps, and Twelve Traditions of NA, tend to dish out their opinions and suggestions about another addicts situation with a sense of having more wisdom. This type of knowledge sharing makes sense personally because, if one buys into the literature and has success in the program, the Basic Texas describes that a more experienced person in recovery is the key to a newcomer’s abstinence. It only makes sense to surround you with someone else who knows what it feels like to be in early recovery or trying to get clean. So, this egalitarian model, in addition to the mutualistic relationships that are essential to a person’s recovery, works perfectly

Get Access