Egyptian Revolution Research Paper

Journalist Joseph Darda discusses the implications of the Iranian revolution. In this article there is a focus on the political as well as social aspects that this conflict induced. This article was chosen because of its moderate stance on the Iranian revolution. Both sides of the conflict were presented.

Ancient Egyptian government was a theocracy meaning that the pharaoh was seen as a representation of the gods and he was as well in charge of the government and the military.

The latter half of the 20th century was an incredibly turbulent time for Egypt as regimes cycled in and out every couple decades and the country seemed to always be at war. “The Yacoubian Building”, a 2002 film, illustrated how the resulting corrupted government and abysmal economy affected Egypt’s population, especially the lower classes. Additionally, the viewer saw how these two factors led to both the appalling treatment of women and the rise of violent insurgency groups.

I will first introduce my study and explain why I’m conducting my study and what their responses will be used for.

I grew up in my home country Egypt, in a time some may say I was lucky to have experienced and been a part of. I took part in helping a nation overthrow its dictator who reigned with tyranny longer than I had been alive. I am an Egyptian youth, who fought for my people’s stolen prosperity and withheld freedom against the famous thirty year old Mubarak regime. The Egyptian revolution was televised and kept under the global eye throughout each of its progressions, from start to end yet not holistic in merit.

A cocky archeologist finds a portal that takes him to an altered Egyptian City where he battles raptors and must help the people reset the timeline.

It has been six years since Egypt drove itself into oppositions of institutions in 2011. Still to this day, there is no label of the revolution to be a “success” or “failure”. It is easy to stop the moment of a unethical government was taken down, the reconstruction of Egypt and its laws is an ongoing struggle. In American history, there was no specific day when we came out of mass chaos into a united country of freedom and democracy. For Egypt's sake, all we can do is give them time to get the government back on their feet and support them in what they are still going

The nation of Egypt happens to be a special case due to the extensive manner mentioned in the course of how imperialistic nations have shaped domestic and international conflicts in the country. As seen in the readings of Chapters 15 and 19 by William L. Cleveland and Martin Burton’s A History of the Modern Middle East, the future transitions of regime change that occurred in Egypt under Gamal Abd Al-Nasser and Anwar Sadat and their effects on the populace have been the result of previous potent imperialistic pressures. Foreign tensions tied to nationalization of resources, cultural impositions, and domestic attempts at modernization of mimicry have all set the format for future problems

“For nothing irrational or fabulous or prompted by superstition, as some believe, was embodied in the religious services, but ideas which either had moral and necessary causes or were not devoid of historical or physical plausibility” (De Iside et Osiride. Plutarch. 8.353e).

Ogbonnaya, U. M. (2013). Arab Spring in Tunisia, Egypt and Lybia: A Comparative Analysis of

This revolution caused many countries with authoritarian governments become less self-assured. Despite our inability to conclude definitively that this is going to be the start of yet another global democratic process – these events have shown us that the Arab world is not as obdurate towards democracy as we might have previously believed. In light of this information, we can see the importance of violence as a means of striving towards democracy. The violence in the case of the Arab revolts is seen as a positive stride towards capitalist development. This, in turn, will lead to a freer society by way of disbanding the authoritarian government which rules these

The movement in Egypt started with a push for the resignation of Hosni Mubarak. Egyptians rallied in Cairo and other cities to protest his rule. The regime change started out with the intellectuals, student groups, unions and some others. At this point the military was not involved in a violent manner. Through this first change in power, the military remained non-violent and an ally to the people. As a result, Mubarak stepped down and handed power to the military. Following Mubarak’s leave, the first religious groups finally joined the fight for change. The Muslim Brotherhood provided people, who carried their beliefs, for the new role of leader. For the first time, Egypt democratically elected its president. The Muslim Brotherhood won this election against a “military remnant of the Mubarak regime”[4]. A series of leadership changes followed as citizens realized the corruption of their newly elected leaders. Egyptians wanted Mohamed Morsi to step down because he lied about his plans for when he would come into power. While Morsi was in power so, too, was the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood claimed, “We will blow Egypt apart… There will be blood, there will be booby-trapped cars, there will be remote-control explosions… this (violence) that’s happening in Sinai will stop the second [general] Abdel Fattah el-Sisi declares the reversal of the coup”[5]. Through both action and speech, it is very clear that the Muslim Brotherhood wanted to remain in power. Civilians were being kidnapped, tortured and murdered by the military and the Muslim Brotherhood. Both the military and the Brotherhood wanted to eliminate critical thinking and debate in order to take control of an obedient country[5]. Why would these groups want an obedient country to rule? For the same reason that any leader ruling with violence:

Egyptian’s were described as the most religious people on earth by the Greeks. Their spiritual belief pervaded every phase of their lives to the point where it was considered a constant factor of their existence. One of their most important belief was in the afterlife. Holidays and ceremonies played a major role in the early cultic practices. Every festival was celebrated in a sacred or mythical time of cosmogonic importance. When we think of this, we can say that it’s a very broad topic because there are many other religions who practice their beliefs according to the auspicious timing and date also such as, Hinduism. It gave respect to all of their culture and time-honored beliefs. They didn’t upkeep the need for their religion to have a

Introduction and Conclusion: In the first sentence of my introduction I dive right into the problem and assert my audience when I state “in present day society…” and when I tackle on how

In recent months we have seen political unrest in Tunisia, Egypt and other Middle Eastern countries. In each of these countries the political leadership had amassed immense power and was using these powers to restrain and limit their countrymen from development. The ruling class clearly had formed a political structure with a clear agenda to inhibit the growth of their fellow citizens. In the past few decades, people from these countries have endured structural violence due to political hegemony. Exposure to western media has made the people realize the advantage of distributed power. Hence these countries are witnessing a surge of protest, with people fighting against the system. Parsons emphasizes on the distribution of political power and its effects throughout his