preview

Ehrman And Dr Bird Analysis

Decent Essays

There are many things about Jesus that Dr. Ehrman and Dr. Bird do not debate in these books. They both recognize that Jesus was a real historical figure that was born in Galilee. They both believe that: the Gospels are the earliest writings we have of Jesus, Jesus was crucified, died on the cross, and some of Jesus’ disciples truly believed he rose from the dead (Robert Bowman). In class, Dr. Ehrman talked about veridical vs non-veridical vision. He believes that they may have had visions, or hallucinations, of Jesus after his crucifixion. It is nearly impossible to prove if Jesus truly appeared to them or not. It would be amazing if new evidence could be found for these types of discussions. The most important and interesting topic the books …show more content…

Ehrman’s chapter titled ‘Divine Humans in Ancient Judaism,’ he brings up an idea that makes a lot of sense that I had never thought of. “This was a competition,” between the Jews and the Romans, “Who was the real god-man? The emperor or Jesus?” (HJBG 49). He talks about the beginning of calling the Roman emperor a god; this coincidentally coincided with Jesus being divine and a god. Dr. Ehrman believes that they noted Jesus as God in an emperor or leader way, not as truly a divine being. He also wrote about Judaism being a monotheistic religion, but having two gods. God and Jesus. This second part can be explained as the Trinity, three as one. Including God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. Three separate, yet same beings. This idea is very confusing to understand, …show more content…

Ehrman speaks a lot about Jesus’ divinity, or lack of. He explains that most peoples’ understanding of Jesus was learned through the Gospel of John. Doctor Ehrman believes that John is the latest Gospel. This means that the author John would not have had first hand accounts of Jesus. He also questions Jesus being fully divine and fully human bringing up very interesting questions that were never answered in the Bible. Questions that were about the shortcomings of humanity. “In what sense, really, was he ‘fully’ human?” (HJBG 248). If Jesus did not have the drawbacks of humanity, what, besides a body, about Jesus was

Get Access