Eidetic Memorization Of Memory

Describe what you understand by ‘independent variable’ and ‘dependent variable’ in a scientific study? ( 5 points) An independent variable is something you have control over, what you can choose and manipulate. It is a variable that stands alone and doesn’t change by other variables. Although in some cases, you may not be able to manipulate the independent variable. It could be already there and or fixed. A dependent variable is the variable that’s being tested in an experiment. If the experimenter changes the independent variable, the change in the dependent variable is observed and recorded. For example a scientist is testing the effect of light and dark on the behavior of moths by turning a light on and off. The independent variable is the amount of light and the moth’s reaction is dependent variable. A change in the independent variable (amount of light) directly causes a change in the dependent variable (moth

1. For this experiment, what were the independent variable and the dependent variable? What were the constants?

The independent variable for the experiment was the paper towels. The dependent variable was the absorbency and strength. The constants for the experiment were the size of the paper towels that were used, the amount of water, the size of the beaker, the size of the cylinder and the amount of the weight.

Independent: The independent variable in the following experiment is the temperature as it is what is being changed and will impact the overall outcome of the experiment.

The reaction time (in seconds) is the dependent variable of this experiment. This will be changed by the temperature of the chemicals, and as it is affected by the independent variable it is considered the dependent variable.

Dependent variables are ones that change due to the independent variable. Independent variables are variables that can be manipulated or measured. This influences the dependent variables.

Allport, Postman (1947) and Loftus (1974) also support Bartlett’s idea of reconstructive memory. Loftus mainly focused on the reliability of eyewitness testimonies. As done in this experiment, Loftus and Palmer conducted a study on the effects of wording a question differently and how that would affect the answer. In the experiment the researchers used two different verbs on two different test groups. One was “contact” the other was “smashed”. The effect of this was a change in the speed estimated by the participants. The verb “contact” gave an average speed of 32mph while the verb “smash” gave an average of 41 mph in the experiment conducted by Loftus. There is a positive correlation between word use and how memory is retrieved because of it.

The research question, in this case, is “Are subjects less accurate in their hypnotic response reporting under more anonymous conditions” (Younger et al., 2005). Independent variables are the variables that stand alone, and it is not changed by the other variables one is measuring. On the other hand, dependent variable refers to the variable that changes because of variations in the independent variable. Therefore, the independent variable is less accurate subjects and anonymous conditions while the dependent variable is the hypotonic response reporting.

There also will be an agreement where if the subject feels uncomfortable with the experiment he or she is free to stop and leave. If I was to conduct this experiment then my hypothesis would be if that a person can read 15 cards straight in a row consecutively then the person ESP abilities. If the person cannot then he or she does not have ESP abilities. In this experiment the cards would be the independent variable and the dependent variable will be the person's ability to read the cards. An independent variable is the variable that is change or controls in a scientific experiment in order to see the effects of being tested for the dependent variable; which, the dependent variable is the variable being tested and measured inside experiment. In order to make this experiment more experimental than correlational research, scientists would isolate and manipulate only the independent variable and observe its effect on the dependent variable in order to establish a cause and

The experiment is as follows; one hundred students, randomly selected, participated in a context dependent memory experiment. twenty five were in each of the four following learn-recall situations; hot room-hot room, hot room-cold room, cold room-cold room, cold room-hot room. They were asked to spend thirty minutes learning a list of thirty words. The next day they were asked to recall those words in a fifteen minute time period. There are no results.

The two concepts that I resonated with are Memory and the Psychodynamic theory. Starting with the Psychodynamic theory is an approach to psychology that studies the psychological forces underlying human behavior, feelings, and emotions, and how they may relate to early childhood experience. This theory is most closely associated with the work of Sigmund Freud, and with psychoanalysis, a type of psychotherapy that attempts to explore the patient’s unconscious thoughts and emotions so that the person is better able to understand him or herself. The second one is Memory; understanding how memory works will help you improves your memory. Which is an essential key to attaining knowledge. Memory is one of the important cognitive processes. Memory involves remembering and forgetting. I chose the two concepts because throughout the class they stood out to the most. Understanding the conscious, subconscious mind and also memory. I’m interested in understanding the human behavior.

So we used a cup to count the number of the pennies. The independent variable in this experiment is the spaghetti strands whereas the dependent variable would be the number of pennies being added in the cup. The things that are held constant is the same cup, the same type of pennies, the type of spaghetti that is being used in this experiment, the placement of where the spaghettis should be placed, and the initial setup meaning the same table. First we started with one strand of spaghetti, and placed the cup with the string in the center of the spaghetti, and with that we constantly added pennies into the cup until the spaghetti strands breaks. We continued with this process by adding another strand each time.Everyone would not get the same exact results, but everyone should have gotten roughly the same pattern of proportionality. Not all of our bridges were constructed in the same manner, so our results would differ. The design of the bridge can largely affect the outcome of the data in this particular lab.Three important vocabulary words pertinent to this experiment are independent variable, dependent variable, and controlled variable.Then let me know these three words is very important for this lab.Then the design of the bridge was different in each group.Maybe my group have a little deviation.But it's ok, you still learn something from it! Nice

The following experiment will test the effectiveness of rote and eidetic memorization. Either technique could be effective; however, I believe eidetic will prove to be most effective.

The independent variable was the height the blood was dropped at and the dependent variable is the diameter of the blood spatter. A constant in this experiment would be gravity, the strength of gravity never changes. The things that were controlled are the surface of the cardboard and whether or not people walked by, both were factors that reflected in our trials.

During the Ted Talk Joshua Foer discussed the topic of memory and how we can train the brain to retain any information we can by using memory palace. He argued that an average person can train their brain to remember and store information into memories more efficiently by using different techniques, which will sharper your brain. People have the capacity to memorize anything in a small amount of time by using different tricks. Also memories are “products of what we originally experience and everything that happens afterwards” (Foer). Foer states that it is not about memorization but remembering topics to topics, which helps connects events and helps people remember things proficiently. In support of his argument Foer tells a story about a study the University of London did of memory champions and how these people with fantastic memorization skills did not have any special abilities or unique brains compared to the average person. However, according to these people they use an ancient technique called memory palace to remember thing rapidly. Memory palace is a technique that helps you memorize things by connecting it to a real life situation or something meaningful. Since we have “exceptional visual and spatial memories” we have the memory palace (Foer). The technique illustrates to us how memory/cognitive processes are influenced by social factors.