Electoral College Should Be Abolished Essay

This system needs to be put to an end. The American people are well enough informed to elect their own president without the aide of an Electoral College. The electors in the Electoral College do not actually make decisions anyway. They are just figurative for they should vote along their state’s popular vote, even though most are not legally bound to do so. Even though the electors’ votes reflect that of their state’s popular vote, the views of the people are not always represented. If one candidate receives 50.1 percent of the popular vote, and the other candidate receives 49.9 percent, the candidate with only .2 percent more of the popular vote receives all of that states electoral votes. This system is also very unfair to the third party candidate. He/she has very little chance of receiving any electoral votes. In 1992, Ross Perot won 19 percent of the national

What would you do if you didn't have a say in who runs America and how it is ran. What if you were promised freedom, and told that you had a government ran by the people but you didn’t get any input in the decisions? The direct popular vote doesn’t give the smaller parties a chance, but the electoral college does. Some people believe that the electoral college should be abolished; however, it gives people in rural communities a stronger voice, it allows the President a mandate to meet people’s needs in every state, and it reflects the political opinions of more Americans. Therefore, America should keep the electoral college.

How would you react if you learned that the Presidential candidate you had cast your vote for, had actually received more of the popular vote than his competition, but was not elected the next President of the United States? Every four years in November over 90 million Americans vote for the presidential candidates, then in the middle of December the president and vice president of the United States are actually elected by the votes of only 538 citizens. Wouldn't you think there was an obvious flaw in the system? I would be willing to bet that the majority of you would, but in the case of the Electoral College apparently the majority doesn't count.

The electoral college should be abolished because it clearly makes no sense that a presidential candidate can win the popular vote and end up losing the presidency, it's not as democratic as it used to be , and let us not forgot about the 3rd party candidates that you never hear of as often as they should be. There are many unanswered questions about this topic and why this is seen as undemocratic to critics.

Your vote should mainly matter! Yes, the electoral college should be abolished. The delegates did not believe the president should be chosen by a direct population vote (of the people). They didn’t trust voters would have enough information to make a good choice. The Electoral College is where the president and vice president are chosen indirectly. This system is where all states and the District of Columbia get one electoral vote for each of their US senators and representatives. Also, each state has a slate of electors for each presidential candidate. Another way this system works is by winner-take all method. The winner-take all method is where whichever candidate wins the most votes in the state, wins the state electoral votes. Lastly a candidate must receive a majority (one more than a half) of the electoral votes to be declared president. That is how everything goes in the electoral college. The electoral college should be abolished because 12 states and D.C. total have double the amount of electoral votes but less people than Illinois. Also, the winner of the 1876 presidential election isn’t what people wanted, it was based on the number of electoral votes. Another reason the electoral college should be abolished is that the states with the same representatives dont have the same number of voters. All these issues that continue to happen, need to be resolved by getting rid of this system.

The Electoral College: a system that the U.S. has used over the years to choose representatives and is a compromise between election by a vote. The Electoral College should not be abolished for three reasons. These reasons are: The system helps candidates who struggle with winning the Popular Vote; with Electoral Votes, it gives the little states enough power and votes, and if we abolish The Electoral College, we weaken the Political Two-Party-System. And if not weakened, then destroyed. These reasons will show that the Electoral College should not be abolished, and should be kept.

Citizens should be given proper awareness and education concerning voting representatives for Electoral College before they vote. If the citizens of a state prefer for democrat to run for president then the people that they choose to represent the state should have the same views although in some cases the Electoral College chooses candidates different from the choice of popular votes, but that does not mean that it does not work. Some argue that the electoral college does not work, but there has been only 4 cases since the creation of United states this equates to 93% of the time the Electoral College ballots have reflected the consensus of the popular vote where the popular choice of candidate for president did not get elected , for instance the election of 2000 George W. Bush won the presidency, after weeks of controversy in Florida this made him the first President in more than 100 years to win election despite a popular vote loss, this led to calls for abolition of America's the Electoral College, which means that the electoral college is effective and not an embarrassment. "The Electoral College system gave individual states a key role, each state would choose electors equal to the number of representatives it had in the house in senate." If the citizens of states preferred for democrat to run for president then the people that they choose to represent the state should have the same

The Founders built certain protections for individual rights into this country's founding documents. The United States Constitution was one such document. In particular, such protections guard Americans who hold minority viewpoints from those who side with the majority. For example, the First Amendment protects the right of free speech to ensure that people who hold unpopular views have just as much freedom to express those views as do people who tend to agree with the majority. The United States Constitution, therefore, was intended to protect the individual rights of Americans from a tyrannical government and majority. However, today, the Electoral College does not represent the vibrant democracy into which the United States has grown.

The United States, well known for its democracy, holds elections every four years to elect its President. Every American citizen over the age of 18 has a right to cast a vote in the presidential election. The voting process, although it seems easy and straightforward, can be very complicated. In the 2000 election, Al Gore captured the majority of votes, but George Bush won. The reason for this strange outcome and why Al Gore lost was because of the Electoral College. The Electoral College is voting system where different states are given a certain amount of votes in the election, and which ever candidate wins a state, is given that state’s votes. The Electoral College is out of date, and should be replaced by the Popular Vote system,

Despite the Electoral College system being founded by the founding fathers in America and being there as long as the Constitution exists, many people still do not have sufficient knowledge on how it works. The Electoral College does not provide honest presidential elections rather it has the potential to undo the will of people at any point from the selection of electors to the vote tallying in Congress (Shaw, 3). Electoral College in the United States has played a major role in depressing the voter's turnout. Every State is given an equal number of electoral votes despite the population and in turn, the system has put in place no measure to encourage the voters to take part in the elections. Besides, the system distorts

Thesis: The Electoral College is unfair and should be abolished because of the “winner takes all rule,” the chance that a president cannot have the support of the majority of the voters, and candidates would campaign equally in every state.

Democratic theorist, Robert Dahl once said, “…every member must have an equal and effective opportunity to vote, and all votes must be counted as equal.” This quote greatly summarizes what the Electoral College system means; every person in the United States is guaranteed one vote. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to elect who serves in the government, and we are given that opportunity through this system. This is what the Founding Fathers came up with in order to solve the problems they faced over 200 years ago. However, some have opposed this system is not fit for this democracy, and argue that other systems would work more fairly. On the contrary, I strongly believe that the Electoral College system should be kept because it is the fairest way to elect the President.

One of the reasons that we should abolish the electoral college is because it undemocratic. Our country claims that we are democratic and one of our core ideologies is power to the people. And yet the people who are living under this government have no say in who’s the next leader of the United States? The power is in the electoral college and one of the main actions that goes into determining the best candidate is the winner-take-all in which the candidate that

Recently, doubt of the fairness of the Electoral College has been in the minds of countless individuals. Many questions have been being asked about the Electoral College, questions like “Why does it exist?” “Does it really work?” and “Should it still exist?” All these questions have arose due to the recent 2016 election results. In this election, Donald Trump won the Electoral College vote by a significant amount, yet he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. The fact that this could even happen baffles many people. “In addition to 2016, there have been four other times in American history – 1824, 1876, 1888 and 2000 – when the candidate who won the Electoral College lost the national popular vote” (Speel). Our Founding Fathers debated over weeks deciding on how the president of our country should be chosen. The Electoral College was the result of these debates and has been the system ever since 1789. Many of the reasons that the Framers of the Constitution had for creating the Electoral College at that time are what makes this system necessary today. The Electoral College should not be reformed or abolished because

The current issue regarding the Electoral College today is that many people do not understand its purpose and the reasons behind it. What most people see it as is a faulty way of electing a president that lowers the worth of their vote. Recently, doubt of the fairness of the Electoral College has been in the minds of countless individuals. Many questions have been asked about the Electoral College, questions like “Why does it exist?” “Does it really work?” and “Should it still exist?” Many of these questions have arisen due to the recent 2016 election results. In this election, Donald Trump won the Electoral College vote by a significant amount, yet he lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. The fact that this could even happen baffles many people. “In addition to 2016, there have been four other times in American history – 1824, 1876, 1888 and 2000 – when the candidate who won the Electoral College lost the national popular vote” (Speel). This has deeply separated people who know the subject into