preview

Electoral Process Analysis

Decent Essays
Open Document

The citizens of the United States of America (U.S.A.) have trusted in the Electoral College for the selection of the President. This selection practice has a success rate that may be arguably effective for the majority of the global situations. Using the electoral process to select one individual to make a decision is not without its controversies. The War in the Gulf region beings one controversial process of a timeline strife with disagreement and afterthought. While the support for the president’s initiatives prior to and during the decisions that affected the Gulf region vary, there may be two key points to ponder. The actual level of support and the perceived levels of support that fluctuates depending upon who and where in the country …show more content…

Congress granted the request of President Bush to wage war against Iraqi and their President Saddam Hussein. The overall fact that the Use of Force (UoF) was granted to a President is, in of itself, one of the hardest decisions to make. Moreover, it presents the greatest amount of global responsibilities after the fact, for a President to face (Mintz, 1993). World leaders are expected to lead to rational values with forward-looking efforts in expected maximizing utility values and strategies. Furthermore, the decisions to be made must be analyzed by the selected leader as beneficial in costs while alternative view must be less appropriate for the decision at hand (Mintz, 1993). Although many scholars may argue the utility of the decision the President made in the UoF decision, the decision was made with a clear Presidential process. Likewise, several methods were available and used to produce the most advantageous and the least objectionable method for a particular gain. Two specifically different decision models were used to discover the appropriate alternative to meet the needs of the global players. These models were the linear model and the difference additive model (Mintz, 1993). The results may vary depending upon the data …show more content…

The option generation were being derived with two basic goals; the first goal was created to determine Iraq’s’ options in avoiding military action while the second goal was created to give to the President for action (Wirtz, & Russell, 2003). The first option was derived from the historical and political use of WMD from Iraq (Danner, 2005). Knowing that Saddam only threatened to use and did use chemical weapons against weak opponents such as the Kurds, Iran, and Kuwait, the analysis delivered these facts and determined Iraq would not use these weapons against the U.S.A. Moreover, Saddam was self-serving, in that he knew the global players would not allow him to remain in power if WMD were used. Therefore, the factors of deterrence were in place and working (Wirtz, & Russell, 2003). Other options were still available and being

Get Access