The citizens of the United States of America (U.S.A.) have trusted in the Electoral College for the selection of the President. This selection practice has a success rate that may be arguably effective for the majority of the global situations. Using the electoral process to select one individual to make a decision is not without its controversies. The War in the Gulf region beings one controversial process of a timeline strife with disagreement and afterthought. While the support for the president’s initiatives prior to and during the decisions that affected the Gulf region vary, there may be two key points to ponder. The actual level of support and the perceived levels of support that fluctuates depending upon who and where in the country …show more content…
Congress granted the request of President Bush to wage war against Iraqi and their President Saddam Hussein. The overall fact that the Use of Force (UoF) was granted to a President is, in of itself, one of the hardest decisions to make. Moreover, it presents the greatest amount of global responsibilities after the fact, for a President to face (Mintz, 1993). World leaders are expected to lead to rational values with forward-looking efforts in expected maximizing utility values and strategies. Furthermore, the decisions to be made must be analyzed by the selected leader as beneficial in costs while alternative view must be less appropriate for the decision at hand (Mintz, 1993). Although many scholars may argue the utility of the decision the President made in the UoF decision, the decision was made with a clear Presidential process. Likewise, several methods were available and used to produce the most advantageous and the least objectionable method for a particular gain. Two specifically different decision models were used to discover the appropriate alternative to meet the needs of the global players. These models were the linear model and the difference additive model (Mintz, 1993). The results may vary depending upon the data …show more content…
The option generation were being derived with two basic goals; the first goal was created to determine Iraq’s’ options in avoiding military action while the second goal was created to give to the President for action (Wirtz, & Russell, 2003). The first option was derived from the historical and political use of WMD from Iraq (Danner, 2005). Knowing that Saddam only threatened to use and did use chemical weapons against weak opponents such as the Kurds, Iran, and Kuwait, the analysis delivered these facts and determined Iraq would not use these weapons against the U.S.A. Moreover, Saddam was self-serving, in that he knew the global players would not allow him to remain in power if WMD were used. Therefore, the factors of deterrence were in place and working (Wirtz, & Russell, 2003). Other options were still available and being
There is a number of systems that use PR such as the Single Transferable Vote (STV) (the Regional and National Lists) and the Alternative Vote. There is a third system that combines these two, known as the Additional Member System (AMS) or the hybrid or top-up system. The AMS system is presently used in elections for the Scottish Parliament, where voters can vote for single candidates in their constituencies but also for candidates from regional 'lists' put forward by each party. If there is a discrepancy between the percentage of seats the party has won and the percentage of votes cast, the seats are 'topped up' from the
President George Bush’s letter to President Saddam Hussein is a convincing segment intended to persuade Hussein to remove his forces from Kuwait before conflict ensues. Some critical readers believe that Bush does not provide a rational argument, but this paper is taking the standpoint that Bush not only is rational, but cogent. President George Bush is able to effectively convey his forceful message to President Saddam Hussein, expressing that Iraq must leave Kuwait through the use of establishing credibility, strength, repetition, and persuasive appeals by explaining that the world will not tolerate war and violence any longer.
I think it was inevitable that the U.S. would be joining the war on the side of the Allies. One reason was the Zimmermann Telegram, when German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmermann sent a telegram to the ambassador of Mexico, and the goal was to get Mexico to become an ally of Germany and promise land from the united states if they joined forces but British cryptographers deciphered the telegram and afterwards Mexico declined their offer resulting in America becoming closer to joining the war. America later then joined the war afterwards, but before that was the sinking of the sinking of the Lusitania,
In 2003, President George W. Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell launched an invasion of the nation of Iraq. United States Secretary of State Colin Powell outlined the reasons Iraq posed a threat to international security in a speech he gave at the United Nations. Iraq’s nuclear weapons program concerned the Bush administration. Fearing Iraq might use this program to act aggressively in the region, and wanting to secure oil supplies and a friendly regime, the administration pursued a plan of action to remove Iraqi President Saddam Hussein from power (FLS 2016, 43). A constant secure supply of oil stood as a cornerstone of the military-industrial complex thriving in the United States and a friendly regime in such an oil rich country remained an important objective of President Bush. This directly conflicted with the desire of President Saddam Hussein of Iraq to remain in power.
WHO: is involved in the Electoral College process and what is their role? (e.g. voters, candidates, electors, state official(s), members of our federal government)?
Stolen elections, a connotation for rigged, worry many voters. When Trump was directly asked if he thought that the elections of this year were going to be rigged, he didn’t give a direct answer. In fact, he implied that Obama’s election 8 years ago was rigged. In the description it states that the election might possibly be stole. It implies that trump is commenting on how the election might be rigged, not him stating that it might be rigged. This is a technique that is used to show that Trump was the one who was making an illiterate comment like he usually does about the election being rigged, rather than it being an issue that he is commenting on. as interpreted from trump. The audience they are trying to reach out to are undecided voters.
The populist governments, seen in the 1950’s and 1960’s in South America, spurred industrial growth and a sense of “consciousness” amongst the inhabitants of the Latin American countries. The industrial growth greatly benefited the middle-class and the working-class; however, the poor were driven into shantytowns and rural areas. To illustrate the great poverty of this time in Latin America, people living in “shantytowns” resided in vast settlements built of cardboard and other available materials such as metal and sheets of plastic. These “towns” frequently lacked proper sanitation. One could imagine how living in these shantytowns would degrade the human spirit and foster a sense of worthlessness. The abrupt shift in the social classes
When one thinks of Iraq war, the two key players are perceived to be George W. Bush and Saddam Hussein. As leaders of the opposing sides, they are also perceived as the decision makers. In the individual and sub group levels of analysis, toppling of the Hussein’s regime in Iraq was a success. This success
Every four years, on the third Monday, in October, Canadians take part in elections ("Canada Federal Election 2015." ). Candidates go around within their electoral district to talk about the ideas they have and changes they hope to change. The position that candidates are running for, is to become part of the House of Commons ("House of Commons of Canada."). Elections are going to take place on Monday, October 19, 2015; voters can go to the polls and vote for candidates that will represent them ("Canada Federal Election 2015." ). Canada has fixed elections in order to have election on a regular cycle, but can occur before the “said date” ("Fixed Election Dates In Canada."). Overall, elections for House of Commons are preferred to occur,
Would a direct popular election correct the disenfranchisement of voters caused by the modern Electoral College?
The electoral process is the system used to elect the president of the United States. First, approximately 24 months before the election, candidates begin fundraising; it is also during this period that candidates begin talking to party leadership and support (interest) groups. Next, about 12 months before the election, a candidate declares their candidacy and forms their campaign committee. Sometime during January and February, candidates give speeches to raise funds and gather donors; it is important to do well during this time in order to have a chance at sufficient funding throughout the campaign process. Then, in March, candidates campaign in “Super Tuesday” states; during this time candidates attend debates, raise some more funds, and do their best to win over delegates. During July and August, the selected candidate settles on their vice president during the party convention; it is also during this time when candidates begin to talk with party leaders in order to build a good campaign platform. Over the course of the Fall season presidential candidates work against their opponents through debates and advertising. On the first Tuesday (after the first Monday) in
The first step in establishing an Iraqi threat was to demonstrate that Iraq possessed WMD, meaning chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, and the means to deliver these weapons. The possession of these weapons would be in direct violation of U.N. resolutions put into effect after the Gulf War and hopefully justify any use of force under international law. Time and time again the Bush administration put forth statements that, “Saddam Hussein still has chemical and biological weapons and is increasing his capabilities to make more. And he is moving even closer to developing a nuclear weapon.” In February of 2003, one month before the U.S. waged war on Iraq, Secretary of State Colin Powell brought the administration’s case for war before the United Nations Security Council in an effort to garner U.N. support for an effort to disarm Iraq. By one count, “Powell made twenty-nine claims about Iraqi weapons, programs, behaviors,
The presidential election process is a long and complicated procedure. Currently, we elect our president and vice-president by an indirect device known as the Electoral College. Under this system, each state has as many electors as it has representatives and senators. Candidates who win a plurality of the popular vote in a state secure all the states electoral votes. In order to win a presidential election, a candidate must appeal successfully to the big states, such as California and Texas. Many people are dissatisfied with our country's current election process. A candidate could win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote, and thus lose the presidency. This method has led to a lot of controversies and may eventually lead to election reforms.
As the commander in chief, the president plays a significant role in shaping foreign policy. The president possesses the power to appoint senior cabinet members, commit troops and conduct high level talks with foreign governments. Congress, on the other hand, has the power to ratify treaties, confirm the president’s appointees and approve budgetary measures. And while the president has the ability to commit troops, only Congress has the authority to declare war. Despite criticisms of the American policy making process describing it as inefficient and slow moving, the main purpose and thus benefit of the constitutional separation of power is the framework of checks and balances that safeguard against monopolization of foreign policy decision making.
In August of 2002, the Bush administration’s position about Iraq had changed significantly. Prior to this point, the United States and other western countries had been arming Iraq with weapons of every type. The fact the United States and other countries had been arming Iraq with weapons, shows how little they considered Iraq to be a threat. This quickly changed. A debate on invading Iraq, held by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, created