Electoral Systems in the Caribbean

Speaking of polls as a basis of democracy, it is strongly advisable to make a decision by establishing a background and an impenetrable ceiling constantly in order to evade the formation of resentful groups, namely, which could be about half of the voters. This makes the majority less inclining to reconciliation and balancing between interests. If there is no established tradition with the individuals that the opinion of the majority is correct, they should sacrifice their interests on the basis of other considerations of interest. Belonging to a party could be the only way for an individual to have the freedom or to practice a political activity to contribute through the leader of the party that dominates the party.

Research suggests that the Electoral College system should be amended because it poorly illustrates democracy, is outdated and

ELECTIONS are based on three organizing concepts: equal respect, free choice, and popular sovereignty are the building blocks of fair and just elections. The democratic process should treat all citizens as free and equal persons. As applied to the electoral process this requires that each citizen equal opportunity to have his or her vote equally counted.

Is it possible that the heart of the election process hurt the principles of democracy more than it helps? The Electoral College has existed since the time of the Founding Fathers leading many to believe it is a crucial aspect of the election process meant to protect the ideals of democracy. In truth, this system has largely hindered the possibility of a representative government. Thus, the Electoral College is archaic and anti-democratic, supporting unfair election practices such as underrepresentation and must be abolished.

Populace elections, like most states in the world, provide that every vote carries the same weight in the race as any other. It also ensures that the president is elected honestly by all people. The populace votes to make sure that instead of sending the representatives to vote, people make their votes independently (Lewis, 2016). It is also redundant for elections to be voted twice; first by the majority then by the

Rhetorical Analysis: The primary audience for this paper includes every citizen aged eighteen and above eligible to vote in the United States. The proposed topic mostly concerns these individuals due to the fact, they are affected by presidential voting institutions. Throughout this paper, I will be arguing in favor of the Electoral College, with an end goal of persuading my audience of the benefits of the system.

In this argument, replacing the Electoral College with a popular vote is shown to provide a more unified and knowledgeable country. As shown through Spenser Mestel and Clifton B. Parker, a popular vote would empower all voters and allow minorities and majorities to hold equal power. Additionally, the Electoral College remains irrelevant because the basis for its creation was eliminated by the Anti-Slavery Amendments or the Thirteenth Amendment. Furthermore, the Electoral College restricts presidential candidates from utilizing a transregional approach. This not only divides the nation by state lines, but disenfranchises minorities and majorities alike. Although the Electoral College provides a sure way of electing a president, a single popular vote would serve the democratic country more effectively.

As election day rises, so does significant questions surrounding the Electoral College system. Mainly the subject of whether or not to disband the system will again be a hot topic amongst voters and legislatures. The question that remains in the minds of the everyday voter is if their vote actually counts toward appointing a President when a system such as the Electoral College is in place. Nevertheless, before forming an opinion on the matter it is important that one consider what the Electoral College actually is and how it functions, furthermore understanding why the framers of the Constitution thought it necessary to create this system. To properly form an opinion, avenues of critics and supporters must both be explored. Only through this considerable amount of information gathered can you take a stance on the topic.

Analyze criticism of the "Electoral College" system and the alleged advantages and disadvantages of various reform proposals.

Under the Canadian constitution, the selection process of senators is done by the governor general on the advice of the prime minister who appoints officials. Ultimately, this method has gained an unpopularity and even a call to action to abolish Senate. However, Canadians should be engaging in the work of reconstructing our democratic institution. We should be able to trust our organizations by choosing the officials in them. In the study of the Senate, Bakvis (2001) argues, “an elected Senate would garner the greatest support, and in starting with a clean slate makes it easier to adopt [regional] representation” (p.72). With the availability of choosing representatives instead of the prime minister simply appointing senators, the face of the Senate of Canada can be designed to produce a more legitimate body by an electoral system.

Government officials must be elected by the people and all adult members must be treated as equals who have the ability to form, signify, and have preferences their weighted equally. During elections the government will not be able to restrict participation nor suborn the process during voting. Votes in Country X must be weighed equally and everyone must have the same number of votes. Country X must also consist of civil liberties that include the certainty that the government cannot prohibit one from complaining about the government itself, which will also constitute for the right to Freedom of Speech in the country. In conclusion, Country X must be a political regime in which the rulers are accountable to the ruled and this accountability is formed through institutionalized participation and

No matter how flawed, regular elections aid in the production of a variety of consequences that, albeit unintuitive at times, can be beneficial. Having mass involvement in elections creates a form of psychological pressure on both voters and politicians; without intending to, they allow everyone to have a voice, which results in voters feeling a pressure to be more involved citizens, and in politicians feeling a pressure to be more effective leaders.

Overall, the Caribbean should adapt to the Presidential Democratic System. Although it may seem very expensive to fund such type of government, it may cost less in the long term. The check and balance that a presidential system offers allows for less corruption and Executives to be held accountable of their actions. Policies and laws would be more accurate and better evaluated having two separate Agencies in review of such nature. The Presidential system allows for more transparency which is one of the ultimate objectives of a democracy.

During elections in countries with corrupt governments, for example, it has to be decided whether the guarantee of every individual’s right to vote or who wins is more important. (Wong, Lecture, October 24) Moreover, deep divides continue to exist and separate groups in democratic countries by race, religion, language, and class, resulting in tension and, in some cases, oppression. Thus democracy, despite its emphasis on liberty, equality and plurality, can still be problematic.

Essay Question Number 4; The Electoral systems in the Caribbean needs to be changed. How real is this view?