Electronic Medical Records Vs. The Ohio State University Medical Center

Today’s world in Health care Electronic health records are being utilized in every office. With that utilization of the electronic health records from your staff and physicians and patients, the reduction in mis-diagnoses is continuing to decrease as the years pass. Some would say that EHR is a continual migration path sometimes dictated by internal organizational issues. (Latour, 2009) A CIO would need to research and evaluate every option for her hospital staff. The hospital would do great to join the newly HIR organization to extend its ability to care for patients across the continuum of care (Latour, 2005) The whole purpose of the EHR system is to provide quality care by providing care to patients ensuring accuracy, comprehensiveness, data integrity, data security, and decreased medical errors within the patients chart and clinical side.

Electronic health records (EHR) are health records that are generated by health care professionals when a patient is seen at a medical facility such as a hospital, mental health clinic, or pharmacy. The EHR contains the same information as paper based medical records like demographics, medical complaints and prescriptions. There are so many more benefits to the EHR than paper based medical records. Accuracy of diagnosis, quality and convenience of patient care, and patient participation are a few examples of the

A wave of medical errors and patient deaths caused by healthcare providers renewed the search for a viable EHR system in 2000. Electronic health records would allow "providers to make better decisions and provide better

By evaluating, comparing and calculating the best fit of three different EHR vendors illustrated in Appendix B, Durity, LLC, will purchase the Epic electronic health record system to replace its ancient paper-based system. The essential categories that an EHR enhances are interoperability, safety/security, quality/reliability, efficiency, and communication. According to Pennic (2014), “Epic continues to dominate the EHR market for hospital and health systems with 37% of users…”. Furthermore, Pennic (2014) reported, “For many physicians, “ease of use” determines their overall perception and experience with the EHR, affecting patient interactions and time spent documenting”.

Although the general population has concerns about who has the ability to access their medical records, data has been put into place showed that the general population knows that having an EHR would be beneficial (Thede, 2010). Research has suggested that patients, providers and insurance companies have benefited from EHRs because insurance companies do not have to pay for duplicate testing as well as patients and providers having the ability to increase the quality of care that is provider (Thede, 2010). Not to mention, the patients aren’t pained to have to remember every detail of the history when visiting various specialist (Thede, 2010). Moreover, EHR can increase medical staff efficiency and reduce errors, and keeping adverse drug events from happening (Bill to promote electronic health records proposed, 2008).

As patient information is readily available in the electronic record, it makes health care provider make better and quicker choices and decisions. These decisions can be based on evidence base care that is supported through data that is gathered from the patient’s records. EHR improves patient safety by providing access to information, eliminating gaps of communication among the different providers, decrease redundancy, and reduces duplication in testing. EHR has benefited health care and at the same time create positive outcomes for the nurses. Some of the positive outcomes for nurses are; comparison of previous to current data, improves documentation of the quality of care, allows recognition of the work done in measurable units by nurses, and reduces redundancy with baseline demographic data (Hebda & Czar, 2013). Data that is summarized through the EHR can evaluate performance management and look at quality issues. Along with those features, EHR can potentially increase efficiency, improved quality of care, standardize documentation, increase clinical workflow, and improved overall outcomes for

As an organization that pride itself on continuous improvement it is time to move away from an electronic medical record (EMR) to an electronic health record (EHR). The organization currently utilizes three different EMR, each for different reasons. This has and will continue to make accessing patient information difficult and inefficient as access to each database is dependent on individuals role within the organization. Overall, this will continue to influence patient care negatively. Currently, only nurses have the ability to enter and change orders, therefore, all orders must be given verbally to the nurse or be written down. Further, the system only contains information of each clinics patients and not across the

health care centers (Morris, 2014). Employing electronic health record (EHRs) systems is one strategic method health care centers can use to increase patients’ accessibility to care (Shaw et al., 2011). For example, Shaw et al. (2011) emphasize EHRs make it is easier for health care providers to retrieve vital health history information necessary to adequately treat their patients. In addition, after health care providers learn how to properly use all the functions of EHRs, they become more efficient with their time allowing them to see more patients during their clinic hours (Shaw et al., 2011). Therefore, EHRs contribute to health care organizations providing quality care, while also improving patients’ accessibility to health care

The potential for Electronic Medical Records (EMR) to transform healthcare making it more accurate, efficient and cost-effective is significant. Studies indicate that the most common workflows and processes that EMR systems are used for automating can save a healthcare provider up to 67% of the total costs of correcting error-filled reports and minimizing the costs of malpractice insurance as a result (Walker, 2005). The best and most significant Return on Investment (ROI) of all however are the significant gains made in patients' recovery time and effectiveness of treatment programs (Darr, Harrison, Shakked, Shalom, 2003). Between the cost reductions made possible through effective use of EMR systems and the ROI of saving lives, the collection of these technologies, systems and processes show significant potential in streamlining patient-based workflows while increasing the quality of care (Richards, Prybutok, Ryan, 2012).

In this article review analysis I will present a summary of the findings as well as evaluate the strengths and shortcomings of this article in relation to patient satisfaction with electronic medical records. This journal article aimed to accomplish two objectives, the first being to establish if patients are satisfied with the electronic medical record system and if so to what degree (Liu, Luo, Zhang & Huang, 2013, 785). The second objective was to determine what factors involved in the electronic health record (EHR) system lead to patient satisfaction. The hope was once these factors could be identified, companies could design

In today’s world, there is no place without some type of technology, and it has been moving into the hospitals for several years. So, it makes perfect sense that, so many patient and professional health care provider applications have been created. Not surprising that there are so many applications that a study was done on their functionality. I browsed through several of them and decided on two of them.

mHealth is transforming the way people with chronic illness are retrieving and evaluating information and communicating with their primary physician or other health professionals (Free et al., 2013). Mobile technology can be utilized to remind patients to take their medication at proper times, and it can assist patients record their health symptoms and send them to his/her primary physicians and specialists electronically as needed (Manojlovich et al., 2015). Instead of waiting for patients to understand that they have any abnormalities and visit their doctor,

As a patient with complex health histories I have an easier time with EHR’s because my consulting physicians have quick access to patient records that provides a snapshot of my health history, including labs and medication prescribed. The EHR interfaces with labs, hospitals, and providers. There is quick access to record which enables improved decision making, and enables safer more reliable care. It is more convenient for me because

Electronic health records (EHR’s) have many advantages, but there are plenty of disadvantages. EHR’s were created to manage the many aspects of healthcare information. Medical professionals use them daily and most would feel lost without it. Healthcare organizations were encouraged to adopt EHR’s in 2009 due to the fact that a bill passed known as The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act). “The HITECH Act outlines criteria to achieve “meaningful use” of certified electronic records. These criteria must be met in order for providers to receive financial incentives to promote adoption of EHRs as an integral part of their daily practice”, (Conrad, Hanson, Hasenau & Stocker-Schneider, 2012).

Some believe that EHRs are justified because they are beneficent; they are purported to do good. EHRs system increases the accessibility and portability of patients’ health information and also remedies the flaws of paper health records (Harman et al., 2012; Layman, 2008). Imagine treating a patient with complicated medical conditions in your dental chair