Electronic Voting Analysis

As technology has evolved there have become more ways to cast a vote than ever before. Most people are familiar with the traditional way of

For several decades, the American people have been skeptical if their votes count due to the uncertainty of various voting methods. The election process is marred with dissatisfaction and inaccuracy in governmental elections. Voting means a lot to citizens because it is what gets the people’s voices heard. There are voters that are uncertain of trusting the candidates that will make their laws and regulations, however, they still have the power to vote them out from office. But when different types of voting equipment have problems those issues affect all voters. There are ways of voting that can sometimes fail, and the discovery of fraud in the voting process can make people question the election results. The right to vote is what many Americans believe is the most essential part of being an American in a democratic nation. To keep the American citizens’, trust the voting operation system must work properly and establish that the people’s votes are counted. The American election administration is facing the new generation of technology that is designed for voting. The management of hardware and software can be a great challenge for many upcoming elections throughout the years ahead. Today, there are several methods of counting votes with equipment that are used for the election system. The voting methods are Direct-Recording Electronic (DRE), Optical Scan Paper

I think voting should be done via EVMs in the following essay I will tell you why, and also tell you how to fix some of the problems that voters may have with EVMs.The first and one of the most valueable assetts provided by EVMs is it's ability to provide ballots in different languages.A voter in which english isn't thier first language is less likely to go out and vote due to a fear of not understanding what they are voting for which is why a machine that provides ballots in an array of languages will most likely improve the number of voters.Paper ballots come in only 4 languages this is due to high printing cost with the EVM you save the printing cost and provide accessibility to ESOL voters.A second benefit to the EVMs is easy access to

In 2000 Riverside County California decided to spend 14 million dollars to make their voting system all electronic. This decision was made on the basis that in 1998 more than one million dollars was spent on paper ballots (in Riverside), but when only half of the county voted the extras had to be trashed. For local elections their new electronic system fetched a 99% approval rating from voters (Wired.com article). The only foreseeable downside to this technology is the start up price and with internet voting not likely due to security issues, this maybe the best solution.

The United States of America should stick with old school paper ballots. On paper is safe, reliable, cheap, and cannot be tampered with. Protecting your votes should be top priority.

Also, EVMs could be hacked unlike paper ballots. Malicious software was discovered transfering votes from one candidate to the other in 2007. Security risk have been found in voting machines made my every major manufacturer, paper doesn't have a security risk. In virginia 2014, EVMs were shut down after voters reported machines recording the wrong votes. These are a few reasons why paper ballots are better than EVMs.

Voting is a right not a privilege , as we all know and some people have different opinions on how it should be done. I feel as though that electronic voting is a bad idea.

It is better not to use EVMs macines.Voting is a right that has to be taken seriously. It is best to stick to a method that everyone is most comfortable in.The reason why is the cost,time consuming and are not assesible to everyone.

Some believe that electronic voting machines or EVMs are helpful in the use of alderly or people with physical disabilty. While some believe it is to great of risk that it could be hacked. I believe we should have EVMs.

EVMs are simply more efficient than paper ballots. When a vote occurs, every citizen's ballot is stored in the machine's memory then digitally transferred to a single location to be tallied up. With paper ballots, each slip of paper must be carefully stored and counted

Another concern is hacking, but EVMs are not connected to the Internet and record every action during voting to avoid tampering. Harris Miller, President of the Information Technology Association of America, says that electronic voting systems are more secure than paper ballots.

I believe that Electronnic Voting Machines would be extremely useful to todays society of people, especially in the United States. As the top article has stated, there is 33.7 million people of vating age with disabilities who are unable to get to the voting stands without major difficulty, that's 20 percent less likely to vote, which causes a major difference in the actual amount of people who believe in one topic over another. There is also the concept of having a machine that can change languages per user, so if we were to have a card that had our information on it and our first language than we could also help with the minority that don't know how to speak in English. Though there are plenty of arguments about EVMs being able to get hacked

However, i beleieve that it should be made accessible and convinient to all voters.The second passage specifys the costly issue with some states.The first passage specifys how they think it would make it easier for voters with dissabilities to be able to vote.Theres also a point of privacy.I also believe that all ballots should have access to all languages.

No ballots can be misplaced and there is no need for poll workers to help a voter out by looking over the voters shoulder, then making changes where necessary (Voting Technology Project). People are looking to protect their privacy and make sure that there vote is one of the votes that really count. The problem is that it is not safe to have a paper or receipt type thing printed out for a voter, this type of thing could lead to a wide spread buying of votes by the separate sides. Buying votes is obviously something neither side wants to see happen.

A voting system has four characteristics: accuracy, anonymity, scalability, and speed. Current electronic voting machines claim to