preview

Eli Whitney's Use Of Interchangeable Parts And The Cotton Gin

Decent Essays
Open Document

Industry and agriculture in the 1800s was significantly changed with the invention of both interchangeable parts and the cotton gin. Eli Whitney revolutionized agriculture and manufacturing in America during the 1800s with both his invention of interchangeable parts and the Cotton Gin. With the invention of interchangeable parts Eli was able to initiate factory production and influence the American Industrial revolution. According to the articles about the Eli Whitney Museum article “Whitney’s work in making muskets from a number of interchangeable parts once identified him as the sole originator of the idea.”(https://www.eliwhitney.org/7/museum/about-eli-whitney/factory) The purpose of interchangable parts was so that if one piece on a machine …show more content…

The cotton Gin was designed to remove cotton from its seeds. Before the cotton gin the process of separating the cotton from the seed took hard work, tiring and time consuming to do by hand. Thanks to the cotton gin slaves no longer had to do this tedious work; now they could just run the cotton through the Cotton …show more content…

As a result America started to produce three quarters of the world’s supply of cotton, allowing for big businesses to mass produce cloth. Cotton soon became “king” exceeding the value of all other products in America combined.

While the 1800’s were full of groundbreaking inventions it is also home to many changes in quality of life and living, including the educational reform, the prison reform and the abolition movement. In the early 1800s getting an education was not a priority or option for most children. While it was often class based and varied between the north and south. Most children attended little to no school and the education they did receive was provided by unqualified teachers who received little pay. The education reform directed by Horace Mann helped bring about state sponsored public education, with curriculum and local property tax to finance education. Horace Mann believed that “popular schooling could be transformed into a powerful instrument for social unity.” (https://www.mackinac.org/2035) The organizarional model Mann and others adopted for massachusetts was the Prussian educational system. Allowing for the state to control education from lower grades up to the university level. Along with the state supervising the training of the teachers, children were

Get Access