preview

Eliot Cohen Supreme Command

Decent Essays

The civil-military relations during wartime have been always widely discussed among scholars as much as the military and political society. Eliot Cohen was no exception. In his book, Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen and Leadership in Wartime, Cohen tried to sell his product of civil-military relations based on the concept that, the civilian authority should intervene at the tactical and operational level in order to achieve success in war. Based on this thesis, he presented a practical demonstration through four historical portraits: Lincoln, Clemenceau, Churchill and Ben-Gurion. In order to discuss his account to these cases, I will define in this paper the general argument of the Supreme Command then I will explain how Cohen account of civil-military relations during the American Civil War and the British during World War 2, concluding which case better support his general argument.
To understand the argument of Cohen to civil-military relations, we must go back to the influential study, The Soldiers and The State, published by Samuel Huntington in 1957, where the latter sets the foundation of the civil-military relations and how a civilian government controls its military. Huntington presented the concept of “objective control” where military professionalism and civil supremacy are the …show more content…

Conversely to the secretary of war, Simon Cameron, and the commanding general Winfield Scott, he ordered the nonviolent supply of Sumter overruling his senior advisors. Even when his trustful general Grant took command ,Lincoln’s involvement in operations did not end when he took the control during the last Confederate invasion of the North, Jubal Early’ s raid on Washington in July 1864, suggesting the return of Grant to Washington for the destruction of Early’ s

Get Access