In April of 1857, English poet Elizabeth Barrett Browning wrote a letter to address to Napoleon the III. The letter was about the banishing of a French writer, named Victor Hugo, whose writings were bashing the government. Even though this letter was never sent, Elizabeth was trying to get Napoleon to pardon Victor. Elizabeth used rhetorical strategies to make her letter seem more appealing to Napoleon. Elizabeth begins her letter to Napoleon by asking for him to “have patience with [her]” while he reads this letter. Elizabeth wants Napoleon to reads her words carefully, and she wants him to know that her words are not spoken against him. Elizabeth wants the Emperor to know that she is trying to help him, not anger him. Elizabeth explains …show more content…
She states that Napoleon’s child may “recall that his imperial father was great enough to overcome this great poet with magnanimity.” Elizabeth is telling Napoleon that his children will be proud that he did not let what someone says about him affect him, rather than getting frustrated and banishing the person who made the statements about him. Elizabeth states that she believes it was easier to write a letter to Napoleon than his wife, because “[she] felt that it would be harder for her majesty to pardon an offense against the Emperor.” Elizabeth thinks that the Empress would take what Hugo says more personal and would be more offended by the statements. Elizabeth decides it would be better to send a letter to Napoleon, because he would be more open to reading what she has to say, however; she think the Empress would be more upset and then proceed to do something further than just banishing Hugo. Even though this letter was written more than 200 years ago, and was never actually sent, it still impacts the way people feel about Napoleon today. It shows that women like Elizabeth Barrett Browning were just trying to have an opinion. She was just a woman trying to get her point across to Emperor Napoleon the III as to why Victor Hugo should not be
In Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s letter in the direction of Napoleon III regarding the banishment of the French creator Victor Hugo, she used many exceptional strategies to try and pardon Hugo. some of tries encompass Browning trying to belittle Napoleon and using sarcasm about how she thinks he's a robust chief but then gives his terrible movements. near the cease of the letter, however, Browning includes her admiration in the direction of Napoleon III. on this letter, Browning has more than one records and other points wherein she will use to counter Napoleon’s emotions dealing with victor Hugo. The English poet, Elizabeth Barrett Browning honestly uses exceptional rhetorical techniques to petition Napoleon.
During the 16th century, Queen Elizabeth I experienced a lot of oppression during her reign in England. Many religious figures opposed the idea of a female ruling a country, saying that it is against God’s will. Other citizens of the country, specifically personal associates of Elizabeth, however, stood behind the queen and admired her bravery, confidence and love for England. Elizabeth responded to the gender ideas in an authoritative way, She had to live with female stereotypes, and used it to her advantage when possible but she asserted that the stereotypes did not completely apply to her and that she was perfectly capable of ruling England.
Elizabeth responded authoritatively to the differing opinions of her people. In Jacques Bochetel de La Forest’s report on Elizabeth’s response (Doc. 6), Elizabeth makes her claim as a strong, and independent woman. She explains to the parliament that without her, no actions or measures can be taken, and she dismissed them angrily. Moreover, Elizabeth’s speech to
The author utilizes exaggeration in her letter, in order to convince Napoleon to pardon Victor Hugo for his writings. In the letter, Browning states, “I have been reading with wet eyes and a swelling heart (as many who love and some who hate your Majesty have lately done),” (Browning 14). In this example of exaggeration that Elizabeth Browning uses in her writings, she attempts Napoleon to feel sympathy towards Hugo. She writes with such emotion and exaggeration, to try and persuade Napoleon’s thoughts and ideas toward Hugo. Obviously, Browning’s heart is not swelling, however, she attempts to exaggerate her feelings, in order to convince the emperor of France.
Elizabeth’s character was a mystery to most people at the time she inherited the throne. She had learned to keep her own council, control her emotions, and always behaved cautiously, thus being able to disprove all rumors about her. Always dignified and stately, she could be vain, willful, dictatorial, temperamental, and imperious. She had courage, both in her decisions, and in the face of danger. Possessing an innate of humanity, she was not normally cruel, unlike most rulers of her day. Most regarded her to be unusually tolerant in that age of religious conflict. She saw herself as one who was always honest and honorable, who
Interpretation of the quote: “…I was restrained, when I thought of the heroic and suffering Elizabeth, whom I tenderly loved, and whose existence was bound up in mine.” (62 )
George Washington was one of many that was impressed with her work. During this time period, the writings were focused mostly on freedom. This was at the same time of the Revolutionary war against Britain. When he was appointed commander in 1775, she sent him a ode in his honor. It spoke a lot of
It can be easily said that the intended audience for this letter was to Marie Antoinette’s mother, Maria Theresa the empress of Austria. Marie states several times throughout the letter of her many thanks to her mother for the reciprocating letters. The excitement in Marie’s tone is evident that she is astonished, despite the chaotic excitement upon their arrival, the amount of order there is. Marie is overjoyed that despite the hardships that the peasants faced, such as taxes, they remain loyal to her and her husband Louis, and show their affection with cheering and excitement. In response to the love that they received, Marie makes a point to tell her mother that the dauphin and herself wished the citizens not to be harmed despite the fact that they were unable to move for hours from the sheer masses of people who gathered upon their arrival.
Beginning with Mr. Darcy's failed proposal and his later letter of explanation, Elizabeth's proud and judgemental nature is altered by the pressure placed on her to decide if she wishes to marry Mr. Darcy or not. Introspection and her eventual acceptance of her romantic feelings for Mr. Darcy demonstrate that strenuous emotional situations can lead to a change in character, by allowing her to open up her prejudiced mind and see that the opinions she has are not always correct. Prior to her relations with Mr. Darcy, Elizabeth is a young woman who sees little point in marrying if she does not find a man whom will bring her happiness in life. This provides a foundation from which she can change, placing her in an ideal position to change in response to the
One of the most important and game-changing rhetorical strategies Browning uses in her letter is pathos. Browning really tries to glorify Napoleon. Throughout her
Another quote to suggest this is: "I write with no intentions of paining you" Even before he commences the explanation of his actions he makes it obvious that he does not aim to affront Elizabeth. The fact that he states this in the very beginning of the letter, and in such a concise way suggests to the reader that Elizabeth is at the forefront of his mind, and that he has deliberated over what her initial response will be. This is a stark contrast to his previous attitude towards her. During his proposal he describes how he struggles with himself and his "Better" judgement and asks for her hand in marriage, there is evidently no thought into how she would react here.
Elizabeth's reaction to Darcy's stinging words reveals the extent of her imprudent pride. In expressing her resentment toward Darcy's abhorred prideful manner, she says, "I could easily forgive his pride, if he had not mortified mine." Elizabeth's indignation comes mostly because she respected his pride, but he did not respect hers.
The poem “My Last Duchess” is a historical event that involves the Duke of Ferrara and Alfonso who lived in the 16th century. Robert Browning "My Last Duchess" presents a narrative about a recently widowed Duke who talks with an emissary had come to an arranged marriage with another lady from a powerful and wealthy family. In the perspective of Duke, power and wealth were integral in marriage and was determined to be married to a wealthy lady from a famous family. As the Duke orients the emissary through the palace, he stops and shows a portrait of the late Duchess who was a lovely and young girl. The Duke then begins by stating information about the picture and then to the Duchess. Duke claims that the Duchess flirted with everyone and did not appreciate the history of the family: “gift of a nine hundred years old name.”(33) However, when an individual continues to read the poem, it is evident that the Duke played an important role in killing the lady. Duke states that “he gave commands; / Then all smiles stopped together”(45-46) he used these words to define the death of his beloved Duchess. The aim of the essay is to analyze literary devices that emphasize the content of the poem, which includes rhetorical questions, exclamation mark, and em dash.
The French writer Victor Hugo was banished by Napoleon the Third, the ruler of France. Napoleon saw Hugo’s writings to be critical of the French Government. Hugo’s exile inspired Elizabeth Barrett Browning to write a powerful letter to the Emperor to try and convince him to withhold from sending Hugo into exile, unfortunately the letter was never mailed. Browning uses different strategies to try and coax Napoleon into agreeing with her, and not sending Hugo into Exile. Browning starts the letter out by being very self demeaning, then shifts to trying to appeal to Napoleon's ego, in the closing paragraphs she then goes back on her self demeaning and shows that no one other than a women would say what needs to be said.
You must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you." (Austen 161) Elizabeth does not have the same feelings for him, and why should she he was very rude and arrogant towards her.