Elizabeth Svoboda's Use Of Real Life

Satisfactory Essays
I like and agree with you on the way as you presented your analysis, I agree that Elizabeth Svoboda makes use of real-life examples from start to ending not only to support her article, but to captivate the audience and make it more real and credible to the readers, and in the meantime, to support the what, why and how. I noticed the uses of Facts vs Opinion included this in your summary. You definitely established your agreements with the author with a solid basis.
Do you think that there is any possibility that Elizabeth Svoboda’s statement of packratting and the genetic basis, could be she is just trying to cover "any" possibility of reasoning and logic? Logos. Also, facts vs opinion? Being that there is already a study with the possibility
Get Access