Embryonic Stem Cell Research Argumentative Essay

Embryonic stem cells, according to the National Institute of Health, are cells obtained from embryos that are prepared from fertilized eggs which have been collected through the in vitro technique; in specialized clinics. Scientists use the stem cell research to have a better idea about the evolution, aging, and disease. Thus, they keep track of the stem cells progress across the lifetime; this tracking process can help scientists to figure out the genetic mutations of malfunctioned cells in many diseases. However, the stem cell research is controversial among the society. There is a part of the society that believes that the government should fund the stem cell research not only for the benefits it adds to scientific fields but also for its contribution toward the wellbeing of humankind such as the prevention and treatment of a lot of diseases, as well as making new and efficient drugs. On the other hand, opponents argue that the embryonic stem cells should be considered as human lives; they deserve the same respect and protection everyone else has. Therefore, the money of the taxpayers should not fund and promote an immorality.

Many of the criticisms directed towards the advent of stem cell research have centered on the source of the most scientifically useful types of stem cells—pre-implantation human embryos. Unfortunately, harvesting embryonic stem cells typically results in the destruction of the embryo from which they are harvested, which gives rise to a moral dilemma: is it ethically acceptable to destroy an embryo’s potential to life? Those who are against human embryonic stem cell research will answer you with an emphatic “no”; they usually argue much like pro-lifers—“…human embryos have an equal standing to all living persons… and destroying them is akin to murder” (Hyuu 71). However, to halt stem cell research solely because an embryo has the potential

Human embryo’s and stem cell research has always been a controversial issue throughout society. Some believe that stem cell research promises future cures for many incurable diseases, whereas others believe that it is immortal to produce human embryo’s that are ultimately going to be thrown away and used as biological material. The nature of the embryonic stem cell debate is whether or not humanity should proceed with destroying human embryos for reasons such as learning about human development, discovering medical treatments, and testing drugs for pharmaceutical companies. Embryonic stem cell research poses two moral problems including the duty to prevent or eliminate suffering, and the duty to respect the value of human life. This essay will show the Natural Law’s views on this topic as well as the opposing views of Utilitarianism.

Improved technologies in science and health has led to the elongation of human life. Even with this progress, there are still illnesses and injuries that cannot be treated. The use of stem cells to treat patients is a relatively new, but promising, area of science. Although there are several types of stem cells, most people think of embryonic stem cells when discussing stem cell research. While this cell type has shown the most potential, it brings up ethical dilemmas. Negative opinions associated with stem cell research due to embryonic stem cells hinder prospective studies. Stem cell research offers potential therapies, but the procurement of embryos and the destruction of the embryo to isolate embryonic stem cells leads to problems with

Stem cell therapy has been an issue for debate as long as I can remember. The potential cure for any number of diseases is exciting and gives us reason to be thankful for the potential for healing in the people that we love. There is a real potential for stem cell therapy to be the future when it comes to health and humanity. However, the story doesn't end without controversy. Since the beginning of this particular type of research, groups vehemently debated its ethical outcome. On one hand, there is a real possibility to save lives or help people who are hurting. On the other hand, when stem cells are gathered from an embryo, that embryo is destroyed. Those who believe human life begins at conception, believe that this process is killing a human person. Proponents of Embryonic stem cell research say that the embryos that were used to extract stem cells were either a byproduct of abortion or gathered from the aftermath of the birth of a living child.

The problem facing today, is that the human community fear the unknown, there are boundaries to everything in life. That you can not play god, because society frowns upon that. Years of stem cell research are the pinnacle of ethical issues, as to why is this being practiced. Lives matter and the time for change is here. The controversy starts with the first type of stem cells, which are Embryonic stem cells these cells come from an embryo. An embryo is a developing fetus, this brings issue due to Pro life supporters. It is a issue with morality, if it is correct to manipulate a living thing that can not fight for it’s life. The thing that this will explain is as to why the research does not take life, but preserve the the lives that are existent now. The frontier is near the face of people, the fear is that humanity does not know if it’s ready to explain what will happen with the advancement of the research. The way to counter argue that the research the “kills or destroys” the fetus is that the research benefits the the whole human community. Also the research does not idealize the death of a human. It represents the idea that this research is made for medical use. Furthermore the paper establishes as to defend stem cell research, as the difference of a human and an embryo are explained extensively. Embryonic stem cells and its research have controversial in the U.S since the late 1990’s, when the first embryonic cell was created in a lab. The divide in controversy was not

Cancer can be one of the most feared words that one could hear from their doctor. It can turn someone’s world upside down. Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and has taken many lives. Around 7.6 million people die each year from cancer related causes and effects. What if there was a way to prevent these deaths? Well scientist might have found a way to treat cancer by using stem cell research. Stem cell research could open up an entire new realm of possibilities. Despite the opposition saying that this research is to costly and time consuming, scientists should take time and look into what stem cell research can really do to help the human body and prevent diseases. Stem cell research is a type of research dealing with special type of cell. Stem cells are type of cell that is

Stem-cell research is a very interesting and controversial topic that many authors and scientists take time to write about. Christopher Robertson is one such author, who wrote the article “Recent Developments in the Law and Ethics of Embryonic Research: Can Science Resolve the Ethical Problems it Creates”. Robertson provides readers with the information they are looking for and the article has merit as an example of technical writing. This article discusses three main topics: the legal background, how scientific progress can resolve ethical issues, and assessing alternative methods of stem-cell research. By analyzing the three main sections it is possible to see the merit of this article.

The problem is that were choosing between two moral dilemmas; preventing suffering and the value of a human life. Scientist have to agree with the fact that killing an embryo will lead to the discovery of new medical treatments. I learned that stem cells are the blocking blocks for over 260 types of cells so researchers hope that by guiding the cells by placing them in certain organs so they regenerate and build all new cells to treat diseases such as Parkinson's disease, heart disease, or other disorders. I learned that benefits of stem cell research are range from development and testing of new drugs to cell-based therapies in which stem cells are used to replace ailing or destroyed tissue or cells and even could create a whole new organ. However, there are many technical boundaries between the promise of stem cells and the realization of these uses. I learned that we each need very different needs for our own health care and in today's society scientists and doctors are constantly researching a way to make medicine more personalized. One way they do this is by using stem cells. Stem cells have the potential to become any other cell in the body so scientists hope that stem cells can be used to create a personalized medicine in which you replace your own body parts with ,well your own body parts. Scientist not only want stem cells to help the body but also understand how it works.Based on my research I found that there's more than just a few diseases stem cells can cure ;they can cure thousands I found out that once they figure out of to transport the cells they can cure anything;Stem cells are truly invincible. Stems cells can be used to cure blindness and make normal vision way better then it is we would be able to see better details and more vivid

Due to discovery of new medical progress, humans become healthier and their life expectancy tends to increase. Among these breakthroughs, stem cell research shows to be useful in finding ways to a better and longer human life. The development of such technology could yield significant medical potentials. However, there has been numerous arguments, going against the stem cell research due to ethical and [other types of] issues. Despite its rapid success, many people did not want this process to continue. This essay will argue that the stem cell research should go uninterrupted, in order that there can be further enhanced discoveries, in relation of medical and scientific fields. It will investigate the issues, that are connected with the research,

Fifty years ago, people could only dream of having the knowledge to repair damaged organs and cure diseases that take the lives of millions every year. Although it does seem far fetched, dozens of years ago people didn’t think we would ever have the capability to transfer organs, but through decades of research, we were able to achieve that dream. Despite the possibilities it offers, we haven’t been able to get far with stem cell research because of how much controversy and opposition it faces. While abortion is morally wrong to many, stem cell research could help save lives by giving us cures for cancer, helping further the ability to repair damaged organs, and reversing disabilities.

Stem cell research can lead to tremendous social benefits and economic gains for society with the creation of a multitude of different types of jobs. Stem cell research has been affected by the cut in funding due to all the debate. Former President Barack Obama approved major funding difficulties in stem cell research. This will help the United States to retain scientist, so they can pursue their work. In return the jobs that would be created is enormous and much needed. This will help the U.S. surge to be the leading country for medical advances that currently transform our lives. The cure and eradication of diseases will lead to placing people back into the workforce. If the funding continued to grow so would the need for extra labs and

Stem cells are now used to treat various of diseases and studied for possible treatments in the future of the medical world. Although people argue that stem cell research is unethical, I think that it's very beneficial to humankind as it develops treatments for illnesses. Stargardt’s macular dystrophy is a genetic disease that “causes a membrane protein used for active transport in retina cells to malfunction” (Allott and Mindorff 13). The photoreceptor cells degrade in the retina; therefore, one’s vision to worsen severely enough to cause blindness. Researchers developed a treatment by making the embryonic stem cells to grow into retina cells. In November 2010, a woman in her 50s received the procedure and “there was an improvement in her

Biomedical engineering has become a growing field over the past couple years. The new advances and research that stem from biomedical engineers can solve problems that would have never have been able to be solved before. Engineers have been working on new technology that will utilize stem cells in order to save lives and treat diseases. The stem cells that are used for treatment are called embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells are formed from five-day old human embryos that the embryos are essentially human beings ("In Stem-cell Research” Para. 3). The usage of such stem cells has caused controversy because pro-life advocates believe lives are being taken away which embryonic stem cell usage. Despite the viewpoints of pro-life

Within the past few years, scientist have made several breakthroughs with human stem cells. These breakthroughs have catapulted the issue of stem cell research into the middle of a national debate. Most people have no problem with the research itself, however the source of the stem cells (adult or human embryos) used in research is the primary cause of the debate. Some people feel that destroying an embryo is comparable to murder, even if the research it promotes may help people with serious illnesses. Other believe that an embryo is not a person and therefore research on an embryo is the same as research on any other group of cells.