Embryonic Stem Cell Research is Destructive Essay

Most people are against Embryonic Stem Cell research mainly because they consider it unethical to use aborted fetuses for research. The two main issues concerning the research are the ethics (Cons) and the benefits (Pros). In any scientific case, ethics must always be considered. But the use of fetuses is something that is of the utmost importance. The costs are generally measured based off of people’s feelings, morals, and knowledge about the subject up for debate. The use of aborted fetuses for stem cell research may have many positive outcomes that can come of it, but many negative outcomes as well; If using aborted fetuses for research can, in the near future, save lives, then it is a research that should be supported, even though some

Embryonic cells should be allowed to be used because of the medical benefits they provide. They can be used to cure diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, traumatic spinal cord injury, Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy, heart disease, and even vision and hearing loss (nih.gov 2009). There is no problem using them for medical purposes and it is not immoral to use them for this reason. Embryonic cells have the potential to save lives. Therefore, the usage of embryonic cells outweighs the ethical issues.

“I truly believe that stem cell research is going to allow our children to look at Alzheimer’s and diabetes and other major diseases the way we look at polio today, which is a preventable disease” (Solomon). Susan Solomon has founded the New York Stem Cell Foundation and has been seen as the hero for stem cell scientists around the world. Over the past couple years, stem cell research has been at its high; scientists all over the world are using these cells to try to find new ways to cure life threatening diseases. Some have used stem cells to treat patients who have been brain dead recently and these cells made the dead portion of the brain start functioning again. Also, some scientists and doctors have

Do No Harm: The Coalition of Americans for Research Ethics takes a very firm stand against the use of federal funding to aid in embryonic stem cell research. This coalition was founded by 8 extensively educated medical professionals, with the majority of them having specialized backgrounds in ethics or bioethics. The basis of their stance on the argument lies with the legally recognized practice of informed consent that requires a physician to do no harm to a patient. Their argument is that embryonic stem cell research that requires the destruction of a human embryo for the greater good of medicine legally, morally, and ethically defies the informed consent practice.

and it is not safe. Embryonic stem cell research is being done to determine if scientists can create

murder. The killing of an embryo is murder and, therefore, goes against God’s will. Dr. Georgia

Imagine living in a world without cancer, Parkinson 's, or even diabetes. While everyone may wish this is true, people are against a way that researchers can make this possible, which would be by the use of stem cells. There is major controversy on whether or not stem cell research should be allowed, especially when it comes to embryonic stem cell research. Although many consider it to be killing a potential life form, embryonic stem cell research may eventually be acceptable to use because there is consent and a lengthy process to make sure the donor understands what their embryonic stem cells will be used for. That may be viewed as a much better

In conclusion, human embryonic research and in vitro fertilization are both ethically and morally wrong. The use of human life to conduct research in order to gain medical knowledge is an inhumane practice. Also, no one

Immorality( being unethical) is a large issue in today’s society.Embryonic stem cell research is right next to abortion and murder on the “Immoral” list. I am strongly against embryonic stem cell research because , it is taking away the human rights of the child that could be born. All humans are conceived with the right of life. The intentional obtention of human embryonic stem cells deliberately destroys the human forming in the cell. All human beings, not just adults, not just children; not just

The first point brought up is that you have to kill the embryo to harvest the cells. This is essentially killing a human being to benefit others. Another issue stems from this; using an evil means to secure a good outcome. Even though an embryo is killed, good is created from it. Many people could be saved from the possible cures created. This is, however, similar to when German doctors studied the brains of murdered Jews. They were convicted at the Nuremberg trials even though they were working for the “common good.” Today all results the Germans found are refused to be published because of the circumstances they were found in. Another reason that embryonic stem cell research is morally wrong is that the rationale used to say that an embryo is not considered a person “strips all human beings, born and unborn, of inherent dignity.” Embryos are not considered people but deserve “profound respect.” In this case, right and wrong it determined solely because of an act. Actions are considered moral if they increase benefits and decrease pain for the greatest number of people. If this is the case then what if killing a child in the Roman Coliseum helps 50,000 sadists permanently overcome depression at the expense of only one person experiencing pain? Does that make it

Embryonic stem cell research is a highly controversial topic in today's society, this kind of stem cell commits to regenerate any type of tissue. Unfortunately, Embryonic Stem Cell Research has a dark side. To obtain these cells will kill the embryo automatically. In other words, the acquirement of the Human Embryonic Stem Cell includes performing an abortion. To obtain these cells, it would kill the embryo. This has created controversy since abortion is such a divisive topic. Politicians are uneasy to take sides. The Human Embryonic Stem Cell issue is today's Pandora's Box due to all the unwittingly chaos that it can bring to our lives. By having this new option available in the medical world,

In an article written by Deborah White she states, “no cures have yet been produced by embryonic stem cell therapy.” We are wasting all this time using methods that haven’t even made a positive impact on our community, when we could in fact be finding other less harmful and controversial means of curing diseases.

Since there are thousands of embryos left over from in-vitro fertilization banks and aborted fetuses, it is unnecessary for scientists to create embryos solely for the purpose of destruction. Scientists in the United States are now creating embryos and destroying them; however, it is not being done by

Are embryonic stem cells the cure to many of the body’s ailments? Embryonic stem cell research

Both ‘therapeutic’ and ‘reproductive’ cloning techniques create human life. I believe that life is sacred from conception, and must be valued. The embryo is valuable at the time of conception regardless of how the conception occurs. Therefore, therapeutic cloning is morally wrong because it creates life with the sole purpose of use for experimentation and ultimately, destruction. In this method, the stem cells are extracted for research and the embryo eventually dies. Pro-lifers have called this practice “technological cannibalism”.