Emergency Department Chief Compliant Data Entry Screen

For established patients receiving evaluation and management, providers may bill for these services using the CPT codes 99212, 99214. Choosing the correct code depends on the patient’s history, examination findings, and decision-making complexity. If complexity is found to be straightforward taking the provider less than 10 minutes, the billing code will be 99212 (Engle, 2014). If the history and examination findings result in moderate decision-making complexity, requiring more time from the practitioner and more diagnostic procedures the billing code will be 99214 (Engle, 2014). While, Ms. Trinidad does not encounter established patients in the emergency department, within my clinical hours, Ms. Rossow encountered several established patients of various levels of complexity. The billing code 99212 is appropriate to use for patients with low complexity, such as one of Ms. Rossow’s patients whose visit was due to elbow pain after a fall a week ago. Mrs. Rossow also managed the care of patients with a higher level of complexity such as a middle-aged male with a history of recent prostate cancer and a chief complaint of abdominal pain and fever.

You are letting the provider know what the patient chief complaint or reasoning is to be seen at the office that day. All information the patient has prior will be beneficial for the process of the claim.

Coding systems are used in the inpatient and outpatient settings for the classification of patient morbidity and mortality information for statistical use. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Ninth Revision, International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) in the 1970s to track mortality statistics across the world. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), is the adaptation the U.S. health system uses as a standard list of six-character alphanumeric codes to describe diagnoses. Globally utilizing a standardized system improves consistency in recording symptoms and diagnoses for payer claims reimbursement, as well as clinical research, and tracking purposes.

The basic reason for this study is to identify ways to improve the quality of healthcare among patients through bedside reporting method.This will better satisfaction and services delivered at the hospitals. The ever increasing specialization to improve patient outcomes and better health care delivery can contribute to the serious riskof fragmentation of care and problems with handoffs. These are some of the issues associated with emergency room reporting method (Radtke, 2013). There is need to evaluate the handoff method used in hospitals and understand which is the best way to use that increases patient satisfaction. Bedside handoff gives the patient an opportunity to contribute to his or her plan of care. It allows the nurse to visualize the client and as necessary questions regarding their health status. This is the reason there is a need to conduct research on bedside reporting.

The problem list is a key part of the electronic health record. It lists the patient’s most important health problems and gives the practitioner key information to determine the best treatment plan. Accurate patient problem lists

Quality physician documentation is not only essential to providing superior clinical communication, but also allows for the delivery of useful data that “supports quality metrics, acuity of care, billing, and accurate representation of medical conditions” (Rosenbaum et al., 2014). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) uses a system to classify Medicare patient’s hospital stays into various groups in order to facilitate payment of services called Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG). Some payers also use all patient refined (APR)-DRG reimbursement systems. MS-DRG groups are outlined by a specific collection of patient characteristics which include areas specific to the “principle diagnosis, specific secondary diagnoses,

21. Report any unusual or major changes in your patient’s health, cleanliness, physical care, actions and

One of the greatest milestones in the United States health system is the use of electronic health records codes to ensure consistency in diagnosis and treatment procedures provided by physicians (Romano & Stafford 2011). The purpose of the case scenario of the sixteen year old female who visits the emergency department is to show how electronic health record coding is done and its impact on health reimbursement. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes are brought out well in the case study showing how they help in ensuring physician consistency in coding diagnosis and treatment procedures for the purpose of health reimbursement.

An accurate and specific documentation of universally accepted set of codes are important for the protection of healthcare providers as well as increased reimbursement for services received. These codes are for the validation of which services the patient received from their health care provider ( (Page, 2009). Having the correct codes in place insures the provider with the information needed by the health insurance carrier. Maintained by the AMA (American Medical Association), this universal numeric assignment is also used for developing guidelines for medical care review as well as data collection for medical education and research (Scott, 2013).

In addition to the core objectives, eligible professionals must also meet 5 out of 10 from the menu set of objectives. The lists of menu objectives are as follows.

This communication is to inform our fellow team member and most especially the physician groups about the intention of the organization to implement the Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) system. The CPOE application will enable our physician provider to enter order directly into the computer system, the CPOE system will replace the old method of order entry that include, written, verbal order/telephone order, and fax. The CPOE system will enable physician to enter specifications about order such as, laboratory, medication, radiology and special procedure orders. Additionally, CPOE offers some the features of the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) at the point of order entry by recommendation dosage calculations, interactions with other medications, and warning of allergic reaction notifications with alternate medication

Somewhere hospital requires that documentation in the medical record be consistent and adequate to substantiate claims, facilitate care, and provide legal protection to the doctor, patient, and the medical center. In addition to these, the physicians can be queried to clarify the diagnosis, verify visual relationships between diagnosis and/or symptoms, and validate conditions present on admission. Queries may be posed during hospitalization and after discharge. The evaluation shows that the somewhere hospital physician query is not in line with

Chief of Complaint has to be the reason that brought the patient to the hospital in the first place. (This is different from the admitting diagnosis)

By having access to such a large amount of data, we are now capable of comparing and contrasting illness and symptoms, along with treatments followed by healthcare providers, analyze this data and conclude on whether or not a healthcare facility is in fact exceeding their capability of giving that patient the best chance and best

In order to void miscommunication between the doctor and patients, procedures should be setup to help the doctors collect basic information about the patients. This procedure includes getting patients fill out forms