Employee Discrimination In Health Care

Employment at will refers to employment practices that allow the employer and employees to terminate their employment at any given time. Company’s therefore can terminate an employee’s employment at any time for whatever reason or no reason at all. Richard Epstein favors employment at will and advocates for the principle. Epstein argues the proprietary rights, that employers have right to spend their money the way that they want. This means they have all control and decision making when exchanging money for certain labor. Epstein also mentions how employment of will acts as a freedom. For example, At will employment allows employees to freely choose to quit their job whenever they want as well as employers get to fire at anytime, therefore

An “at will” employee is an employee who agreed to a contract in which they can be fired at any time, for almost any reason. The law generally presumes that employees are employed at will unless they can prove otherwise.

Being a minority in the United States has and will possibly always been a struggle. With the economy being in shams and minimum wage becoming career, minorities have multiple issues that society is unaware especially in health care. A large percent of minorities are the majority of workers of America, in which requires the most of the health care distribution. But are they receiving the proper access to health care and prescription access based on their ethnicity/race? Discrimination and racism continue to be a part of the unbalancing inequality in society and have adversely affected minority populations, and the health care system in general. Analyzing some of the racial disparities in health care among Americans are modifications in both need and access. Minorities are most likely to need health care but are less likely to receive health care services, including proper drug access.

Racism is defined as prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior. In the workforce, the issue of racism and discrimination has been brought to the center of conversations around the world. Companies claim to be “colorblind” and not hire somebody based on their race or gender, but the employment rates among minorities and women around the world is significantly lower than the majority in the given country. There is also the growing issue of minorities, such as blacks in america, making significantly less money than whites. This issue affects people all around the world who happen

The employment At-Will doctrine is in place to allow employment relationships to be restricted. It allows employers and employees to terminate a relationship at any time without cause. The doctrine will allow employees to quit without any fear of being held liable for any inconvenience or disruption to the business at the time of quitting. This doctrine also allows employers to make any changes towards an employee’s term of employment (N, 2017). However, some exceptions could prevent an employee to make those changes if the employee is covered in that particular area. Doyle A

Employment-at-will Doctrine is legal rule, which gives employers broad discretion to fire employees “for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all” (Halbert, Ingulli, & Frey, 2015). The meaning of the term at-will lay in the will of employer to dismiss an employee at any time for any reason. From the other side an employee can feel free to leave a work at any time, without reason, and it will not have any unfavorable legal outcomes. Under at-will employer has right to make changes in the employment relationship agreement without any notification. Such changes can be applied to reduction of benefits, rate of wages or alteration in schedule of work. Employment-at-will may put employees in a vulnerable position. Under at-will conditions, employer has rights to dismiss employee with or without any reason. Such dismissal is limiting employee 's legal rights to dispute termination.

Before Reading: I predict this essay will be about racial discrimination in health care. The title states "Leads to Worse Care for Minorities" gives an impression that an individuals ethnicity can affect how one is treated. Furthermore, the photo shows African American women sitting in a wheelchair alone and doesn't seem to be taken care of.

Employment at will is a law that is present in all fifty states in the US; although, in Montana there requires a stated cause for termination. Employment at will creates dissent among employees when they have been terminated for a cause that is thought to be unsubstantial or when no cause is given. There are pros and cons to the presumption, and employees and employers have different views. Employment at will means that the employer can terminate an employee at any time, for any cause without warning. However, even an at-will employee cannot be terminated because of discriminatory reasons. Employment at will also means that an employee can leave a job at any time without the fear of facing any legal consequences. An employer can also

Discrimination significantly contributes to health inequity which is noticeable in the access to health facilities, in the delivery of health services and in exhibited inequalities in the underlying (social) determinants of health like access to safe water, sanitation, adequate housing and nutrition, having higher rates of illiteracy, or working in more hazardous types of employment. Indigenous people are faced with direct discrimination. For instance when less quality care is melted on these groups of people by health practitioners, evidenced by longer waiting times, inadequate diagnosis, the provision of less quality medication, patient segregation, or neglect in patient hygiene or nutrition. Also some portions of indirect discrimination

Based on facts and legal laws, the judge can look over the evidence and rules and make a decision. The employment-at-will doctrine clearly states that the employer can fire the employee at any time for any reason. There are many exceptions to the employment-at-will

Research into the impact of race/ethnicity on health is an important science because it will reveal why there are certain health disparities between certain races and why certain races always rate their health as being poor. For example, according to Sorkin, "racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to report receipt of lower quality of health care" (Sorkin 390). Furthermore, she also discovered that African Americans and Asian/Pacific Islanders are more likely than any other race to rate their health care on a lower tier than other races. Additionally, her research revealed that African Americans and Hispanics were more likely than other races to report discrimination. Lastly, Sorkin states that in response to discrimination, "patient perceptions of discrimination may play an important, yet variable role in ratings of health care quality across racial/ethnic minority groups" (Sorkin 390).

When a person is discriminated against their race, gender, and age. This is some of the most evident forms of discrimination. I believe the most qualified person should receive the job, regardless of race or ethnicity. When employers disrupt workplace discrimination, legally they can be sued by the person or persons and receive bad publicity. When a employee hurts from unfair treatment due to their race and religion. Proving discrimination is difficult as is can occur in a number of work-related areas, during your initial hiring phase, during training or even after you get the job and have to participate in job evaluations. As far as ethnicity goes, Americans come in every color, shape, and size and a successful business is one that understands

     This research paper is a case study focusing on the discrimination of workers living with a disease or illness. I chose this topic based on the need to educate others on the signs of workplace discrimination. Job discrimination in the workplace can effect many people in many different situations. This particular study chooses to focus on those individuals living with a terminal illness.

Employment at will is essentially a rule that strips employees and employers from their rights to due process when it comes to workplace termination. Under this principle employers may let any person go for any reason at any time during their employment with or without just cause. Your stature at the company, time worked, personal conduct; none of those things have to be taken into consideration if you are let go. This means that if an employee does not agree with their grounds for termination, they have no legal right to fight it in a court of law. Employment at will also allows employees to quit their job at any time, again regardless of having just reasoning or not. The only case where an employment at will principle would not apply is if an employee, when hired, signed a document that stipulates other specific terms and conditions regarding grounds for termination/quitting. An important thing to make note of is just as if an employee had signed a contract, they are made aware before being brought on full time, that they are an “at will” employee. These soon to be employees are voluntarily signing that they abide by what is defined in the employment at will principle.

While the world has unanimously advanced and is more accepting of change, the workplace continues to be a place of discrimination, prejudice and inequality. Discrimination is broadly defined to ‘distinguish unfavourably’, isolate; and is context based (Pagura, 2012). Abrahams (1991) described the workplace as an ‘inhospitable place’ where gender disparity and wage gaps persist (Stamarski & Son Hing, 2015). Among other states and countries, the Australian government actively implements and passes laws to protect and maintain equal employment rights. While the objective of these laws is ‘to eliminate discrimination,’ the regulatory mechanisms in the legislation are largely ineffective at achieving this ultimate goal (Smith, 2008). However,